Edited by caracara, 12 May 2012 - 05:49 PM.
Young & Smith in the Wilcat with Jackson.
#21
Posted 12 May 2012 - 05:41 PM
#22
Posted 12 May 2012 - 05:45 PM
Best Player Available, on 12 May 2012 - 04:44 PM, said:
BTW the fitz & Fred comments was called sarcasm. Based on Young and how people believe he will be good at the wildcat although he has never ran one.
Second, early in the year they planned on using it a lot more, but the offense was clicking on so many levels in the first four five games that Gailey didn't force it into the game even though it was in the game plan to be used a lot more.
Third, around the fourth game or so, the injuries started to hit the OL and it was a different line-up pretty much every week for numerous weeks, especially with a rookie like Hairston playing as well as an inexperienced Rinehart. So they didn't want to mess to much with the linemen's heads, worried enough about them just getting their regular plays and techniques down.
Fourth, the WR starting falling like ten pins and soon Brad Smith was forced to play full time WR, and Gailey stopped practicing the Wildcat during the week so he stopped using it in the games. He was very much looking forward to using Smith a lot in it, and passing, too, after they had established that it was a run first option.
Gailey even said that he was very impressed with how well Smith could throw, and that is why they didn't even bother having an emergency or #3 QB on the practice squad.
Lastly, a lot of fans give Brad Smith a lot of grief for one play last year when he was out alone and about to throw a deep ball to a wide open WR downfield, and yet he didn't throw it. Except those fans didn't notice. because it wasn't on the TV screen view, that our WR was not at all wide open, there was a safety right there behind him and waiting for the ball. You can tell he was there because on another angle replay you can see him running there. Smith could see him and wisely didn't throw because it would have been a pretty easy pick. But fans were reaming him for it because it looked like no one was covering our guy.
#23
Posted 12 May 2012 - 06:03 PM
Kelly the Dog, on 12 May 2012 - 05:45 PM, said:
Second, early in the year they planned on using it a lot more, but the offense was clicking on so many levels in the first four five games that Gailey didn't force it into the game even though it was in the game plan to be used a lot more.
Third, around the fourth game or so, the injuries started to hit the OL and it was a different line-up pretty much every week for numerous weeks, especially with a rookie like Hairston playing as well as an inexperienced Rinehart. So they didn't want to mess to much with the linemen's heads, worried enough about them just getting their regular plays and techniques down.
Fourth, the WR starting falling like ten pins and soon Brad Smith was forced to play full time WR, and Gailey stopped practicing the Wildcat during the week so he stopped using it in the games. He was very much looking forward to using Smith a lot in it, and passing, too, after they had established that it was a run first option.
Gailey even said that he was very impressed with how well Smith could throw, and that is why they didn't even bother having an emergency or #3 QB on the practice squad.
Lastly, a lot of fans give Brad Smith a lot of grief for one play last year when he was out alone and about to throw a deep ball to a wide open WR downfield, and yet he didn't throw it. Except those fans didn't notice. because it wasn't on the TV screen view, that our WR was not at all wide open, there was a safety right there behind him and waiting for the ball. You can tell he was there because on another angle replay you can see him running there. Smith could see him and wisely didn't throw because it would have been a pretty easy pick. But fans were reaming him for it because it looked like no one was covering our guy.
#24
Posted 12 May 2012 - 06:14 PM
Best Player Available, on 12 May 2012 - 06:03 PM, said:
I actually was criticizing Gailey for not using it from the point that Smith became a full time WR, thinking they didn't have to practice it much, and he could surely find ten minutes out of each practice to work on it. But I heard him talk about how much they had to work on it to get it working right and he just decided he needed to shut it completely down. That, to me, was an indication of how it's not so easy to just throw that in there and make it work.
#25
Posted 12 May 2012 - 06:16 PM
K-9, on 12 May 2012 - 04:23 PM, said:
GO BILLS!!!
Is Vince Young the new franchise qb to replace Fitz? Probably not. He signed a reasonably priced one year deal that in the short term upgrades the backup qb position. What is wrong with that?
#26
Posted 12 May 2012 - 06:32 PM
JohnC, on 12 May 2012 - 06:16 PM, said:
He was well enough to play and play well. If he had time, and guys open, he would have been hitting them a lot easier, like earlier in the year. I just think he was playing through pain, and sure it affected him a little, but he could play the position and there was no reason to take him out. He gave the team the best chance to win, even though they didn't. And Thigpen wasn't going to do any better, because there wasn't a lot of opportunity to be better.
#27
Posted 12 May 2012 - 06:58 PM
Kordell Stewart ran a version of the Wildcat in his day and had a lot of success with it. I'm sure Gailey sees Young as a more athletic version of Stewart, call him "Slash2" if you will. Gailey/Lee will make the most of Young's ability. If Gailey can make Stewart successful he can certainly do the same with the big/stronger/faster Young who was a holy terror whenhe took off and ran the ball in college.
#28
Posted 12 May 2012 - 08:40 PM
Kelly the Dog, on 12 May 2012 - 06:32 PM, said:
If there is so much confidence in TT then why was VY signed? The signing of VY has little to do with competing with the current starter as much as it does with replacing TT as the backup. Don't be surprised if TT doesn't make the final roster when the season begins. Just my opinion.
#29
Posted 12 May 2012 - 08:46 PM
JohnC, on 12 May 2012 - 08:40 PM, said:
I think you're correct. There's a good chance Thigpen gets cut. It's obvious the Bills aren't happy with their backup QB situation. I think the only way TT stays is if VY shows absolutely nothing at all in camp and preseseason while TT lights it up.
GO BILLS!!!
#30
Posted 12 May 2012 - 08:51 PM
JohnC, on 12 May 2012 - 08:40 PM, said:
Put it this way, they just signed Vince Young to a contract worth less per year and less this year than what they signed Thigpen to exactly a year ago. They didn't think Thigpen sucked. And I would bet anything that Gailey didn't think he sucked. And if you saw the videos, Gailey had little or nothing to do with the Young signing, other than he was on board with it after watching him throw at his visit.
#31
Posted 12 May 2012 - 09:02 PM
Kelly the Dog, on 12 May 2012 - 06:32 PM, said:
He was well enough to play and play well. If he had time, and guys open, he would have been hitting them a lot easier, like earlier in the year. I just think he was playing through pain, and sure it affected him a little, but he could play the position and there was no reason to take him out. He gave the team the best chance to win, even though they didn't. And Thigpen wasn't going to do any better, because there wasn't a lot of opportunity to be better.
#32
Posted 12 May 2012 - 10:28 PM
Later in the game it's 3rd & 4, the Bills put in Young & Smith again. Young takes the snap and pitches it to B Smith who rolls out, fakes a lateral back to Young & then runs for a 25 yard gain.
The possibilities are endless!!!
#33
Posted 12 May 2012 - 10:41 PM
#34
Posted 12 May 2012 - 11:28 PM
caracara, on 12 May 2012 - 05:41 PM, said:
Welcome! Cool video - we'll see where he winds up on the depth chart but if he can still make plays like that they'll have to get him on the field in some capacity. I'm looking forward to see what the coaches cook up for him.
#35
Posted 13 May 2012 - 02:17 AM
Kelly the Dog, on 12 May 2012 - 08:51 PM, said:
Put it this way, they just signed Vince Young to a contract worth less per year and less this year than what they signed Thigpen to exactly a year ago. They didn't think Thigpen sucked. And I would bet anything that Gailey didn't think he sucked. And if you saw the videos, Gailey had little or nothing to do with the Young signing, other than he was on board with it after watching him throw at his visit.
Time they spend game planning for the use of VY (and gameplanning for the Wildcat run by Smith) is time they will not spend gsmeplanning for the bsdr offense run by Fitzy.
Even worse, opposing teams will need to probably drop a half day of reps where they implement again and again against the probabilities of the Bills base O, but instead learn new D approaches and formations to be used when Smith lines up in the Wildcat or Young enters the game.
We MIGHT get an early tell in pre-season if we see the Bills employing unusual sets which utilize VY and Smith on the field. Normally the pre-sewason sees teams running fairly vanilla versions of their plays in order to maintain the element of surprise when the regular season starts.
However, one of the primary things VY brings to the Bills (particularly after we saw how Gailey used the Wildcat last year) is that our O might get the best benefit of showing opponents what we might do in terms of unusual packages and plays from these packages in order to force opposing DCs tow spend time on scheming and implementing for a variety of attacks.
The NFL has become more an more a league of recognition and reaction being the keys for teams. The Bills might best be able to employ the offensivewizardry of Gailey by showing multiple looks. Rather than being vanilla in pre-season, by employing diverse packages (even if we do not use them in the regular season a lot) we force meaningless prep by opponents and give our team some practice doing these unusual things.
#36
Posted 13 May 2012 - 02:02 PM
#37
Posted 13 May 2012 - 04:11 PM
Smith isn't a good passer. Every team knows this. Every team knows he will run in that scenario.
We need to develop a fundamentally sound offense before we decide which backup QB will be involved in the trick plays that few good teams bother to employ.
#38
Posted 13 May 2012 - 04:14 PM
K-9, on 12 May 2012 - 04:05 PM, said:
GO BILLS!!!
I'd like to think a Coke machine is more accurate a passer than Brad Smith.
#39
Posted 13 May 2012 - 04:56 PM
Mr. WEO, on 13 May 2012 - 04:11 PM, said:
Smith isn't a good passer. Every team knows this. Every team knows he will run in that scenario.
We need to develop a fundamentally sound offense before we decide which backup QB will be involved in the trick plays that few good teams bother to employ.
Edited by Doc, 13 May 2012 - 04:57 PM.
#40
Posted 13 May 2012 - 07:33 PM
Doc, on 13 May 2012 - 04:56 PM, said:
I think people are reading too much into the VY deal. I think he is a good backup, because he can be effective (short term) with a limited playbook. I don't believe that they want to use him much, and that they would much rather have Fitz lighting it up with a conventional offense.










