Run the Damn Ball
#1
Posted 10 August 2012 - 09:33 PM
#2
Posted 10 August 2012 - 10:21 PM
#3
Posted 10 August 2012 - 10:40 PM
#4
Posted 10 August 2012 - 10:45 PM
madtowntobuffalo, on 10 August 2012 - 10:40 PM, said:
I knew something was up the last time we played them....that game should have been much closer.
#5
Posted 11 August 2012 - 10:27 AM
#6
Posted 11 August 2012 - 10:36 AM
#7
Posted 11 August 2012 - 11:02 AM
BobChalmers, on 11 August 2012 - 10:27 AM, said:
The Bills took them for granted last year? In what way?
#9
Posted 11 August 2012 - 12:19 PM
This team is not the packers, Aaron Rodgers is not our QB. We should be running the ball 30 times a game with 10-15 play action passes a game and we could be great. I fear Gailey wont run the ball and Fitz will be a turnover machine. Fitz isn't cinsistant enough to throw it 60 times and win.
#10
Posted 11 August 2012 - 12:25 PM
peterpan, on 11 August 2012 - 12:19 PM, said:
This team is not the packers, Aaron Rodgers is not our QB. We should be running the ball 30 times a game with 10-15 play action passes a game and we could be great. I fear Gailey wont run the ball and Fitz will be a turnover machine. Fitz isn't cinsistant enough to throw it 60 times and win.
You do know it was a preseason game and they weren't worried about Fred Jackson being able to run the ball, right? They kinda know what they have with him. Receivers...not so much.
#11
Posted 11 August 2012 - 12:26 PM
Just beat me jeremy.
Edited by The Wiz, 11 August 2012 - 12:27 PM.
#12
Posted 11 August 2012 - 12:40 PM
peterpan, on 11 August 2012 - 12:19 PM, said:
This team is not the packers, Aaron Rodgers is not our QB. We should be running the ball 30 times a game with 10-15 play action passes a game and we could be great. I fear Gailey wont run the ball and Fitz will be a turnover machine. Fitz isn't cinsistant enough to throw it 60 times and win.
So when exactly can you practice a no-huddle hurry-up under game conditions against an unfamiliar opponent to see what your inexperienced receivers and tackles have to offer?
While it would have neen nice If Fitz completed every pass it wouldn't have been any more or less of a revelation to the coaches.
GO BILLS!!!
#13
Posted 11 August 2012 - 01:20 PM
Boludo, on 10 August 2012 - 09:33 PM, said:
Hey guy - you might want to learn a little bit more about preseason and football in general before posting. It has been covered in countless threads already as to why the offense did what they did in the Redskins game.
#14
Posted 11 August 2012 - 01:50 PM
#15
Posted 11 August 2012 - 02:20 PM
The Wiz, on 11 August 2012 - 12:26 PM, said:
And if it doesn't then that's the time to complain about it. These posts complaining about the game plan are about a month too early. If this persists into the regular season by all means complain but until then just realize that the team is working on certain things and not that concerned with game-planning to win a meaningless game.
#16
Posted 11 August 2012 - 03:46 PM
Rockinon, on 11 August 2012 - 10:36 AM, said:
#18
Posted 11 August 2012 - 04:25 PM
Rockinon, on 11 August 2012 - 10:36 AM, said:
T. Choice demonstrated terrible field vision in this game. Now, he didn't have great run blocking on every play, but there were several plays where he had HUGE holes to run through and just didn't see them. It was very frustrating to watch.
We'll have to see how the rest of pre-season plays out, but if final cuts were tomorrow, Johnny White should make it over Choice IMO.











