Lets look at Mario Williams Career Stats and pretend now we are shocke
#1
Posted 03 October 2012 - 07:39 AM
2006 - He had 4.5 sacks his rookie season and they all came in a 5 game stretch. Where he has 1.5, 0, 1,1,1.
2007- He had 14 sacks. 8 of his sack came in 3 games. He season split looks like this: 2,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,1,1,2.5,1,3.5,1, 0
2008- He had 12 sacks. He had 3 - 2 sack games and 1 3 sack game. Here's his season: 2,0,0,2,2,0,1,1,0,0,0,3,0,0,0,1
2009- He had 9 sacks - 1 - 2 sack game: 0,1,0,1,0,0,1,0,1,0,1,1,2,0,0,1
2010- 8.5 sacks with a 3 sack game and 2 sack game. 1,3,0,1,0,0,0,.5,0,2,1,0,0 (played in 13 games)
2011 - 5 sacks in 5 games he played in before injury...he had 2 - 2 sack games: 2,0,0,2,1
2012- Through 4 games he has 1.5 sacks that came in 1 game.
So if we are ONLY looking at SACK numbers Mario Williams has 54.5 career sacks. He has played in 86 games by my count. Out of those games he has had sacks in only 38 of them. That is 44%.
35.5 of those sacks have come in just 14 games. That leaves 19 sacks in the other 72 games he has played in.
If we are judging only sack numbers because that's all the time I have to do you can see Mario is a VERY streaky player. If we looked at this ahead of time we would have known this, but I am sure most didn't realize just how streaky his sacks are.
I am not defending him, or saying he sucks, just simply looking at his career stats.
I can draw this conclusion: Mario will have 2 or 3 more multi sack games this year and finish with around 10 sacks. That will leave 12 games where he has no sacks or 1 sack.
#2
Posted 03 October 2012 - 07:43 AM
I'm still glad we signed him though and it's way too early to judge. Your analysis is interesting. Here's hoping he can be a bit more 'consistent.'
#3
Posted 03 October 2012 - 08:14 AM
#4
Posted 03 October 2012 - 08:17 AM
#5
Posted 03 October 2012 - 08:17 AM
#6
Posted 03 October 2012 - 08:19 AM
cmjoyce113, on 03 October 2012 - 07:39 AM, said:
2006 - He had 4.5 sacks his rookie season and they all came in a 5 game stretch. Where he has 1.5, 0, 1,1,1.
2007- He had 14 sacks. 8 of his sack came in 3 games. He season split looks like this: 2,0,0,0,1,0,0,1,0,1,1,2.5,1,3.5,1, 0
2008- He had 12 sacks. He had 3 - 2 sack games and 1 3 sack game. Here's his season: 2,0,0,2,2,0,1,1,0,0,0,3,0,0,0,1
2009- He had 9 sacks - 1 - 2 sack game: 0,1,0,1,0,0,1,0,1,0,1,1,2,0,0,1
2010- 8.5 sacks with a 3 sack game and 2 sack game. 1,3,0,1,0,0,0,.5,0,2,1,0,0 (played in 13 games)
2011 - 5 sacks in 5 games he played in before injury...he had 2 - 2 sack games: 2,0,0,2,1
2012- Through 4 games he has 1.5 sacks that came in 1 game.
So if we are ONLY looking at SACK numbers Mario Williams has 54.5 career sacks. He has played in 86 games by my count. Out of those games he has had sacks in only 38 of them. That is 44%.
35.5 of those sacks have come in just 14 games. That leaves 19 sacks in the other 72 games he has played in.
If we are judging only sack numbers because that's all the time I have to do you can see Mario is a VERY streaky player. If we looked at this ahead of time we would have known this, but I am sure most didn't realize just how streaky his sacks are.
I am not defending him, or saying he sucks, just simply looking at his career stats.
I can draw this conclusion: Mario will have 2 or 3 more multi sack games this year and finish with around 10 sacks. That will leave 12 games where he has no sacks or 1 sack.
This is akin to looking at a baseball hitter and just looking at doubles. Or a pitcher and just looking at strikeouts. Doenst give even HALF of the picture of what the player's true performace is.
One thing in my dumb head Ive noticed, as CB has pointed out above is that he seems to be handled quite well with just the single-team. Kind of surprised by that. I didnt expect a Bruce Smith three on one and still get through type of deal, but I expected to see...I dunno....more "attention" paid to Williams by opposing OLs.
And one more thing.....in LOTS of sports, it always seems it takes the flashy new free agent a good amount of time to get acclimated, comfortable and produce. How many of US start new jobs, even if fields we are well-versed and just start producing big right off the bat? Not many. I still think Williams is in that awkward stage with his new club.
Edited by RkFast, 03 October 2012 - 08:23 AM.
#7
Posted 03 October 2012 - 08:29 AM
BillsFanM.D., on 03 October 2012 - 07:43 AM, said:
I'm still glad we signed him though and it's way too early to judge. Your analysis is interesting. Here's hoping he can be a bit more 'consistent.'
Come on--he got credit for half a sack.....
#8
Posted 03 October 2012 - 08:42 AM
#9
Posted 03 October 2012 - 10:06 AM
#10
Posted 03 October 2012 - 10:14 AM
That said, he got singled up on what 99% of the snaps vs NE and didn't beat his man once... that isn't coaching that is getting your a$$ handed to you. Same thing vs the Jets for the most part.
The guy can't beat 1 on 1 coverage. I think he goes out there just to collect a pay check nothing more.
#11
Posted 03 October 2012 - 10:36 AM
#12
Posted 03 October 2012 - 10:43 AM
#13
Posted 03 October 2012 - 10:44 AM
#14
Posted 03 October 2012 - 10:46 AM
He's still bad right?
#15
Posted 03 October 2012 - 10:49 AM
C.Biscuit97, on 03 October 2012 - 08:17 AM, said:
Did I hear MW was blocked 1-1, sixty-five out of sixty-nine times by the pats?
#16
Posted 03 October 2012 - 11:04 AM
#19
Posted 03 October 2012 - 11:16 AM
On grass Mario has 48.5 sacks in 63 career games.
I made the argument that Brady is worse on grass. Judging these numbers it is clear that Mario is better on grass. Maybe Russ Brandon & Co. at 1 Bills Drive should switch to grass.











