Romeo Crennell for DC??
#1
Posted 12 November 2012 - 11:22 PM
#2
Posted 12 November 2012 - 11:25 PM
Errr I mean
O I've heard of him! Get r done!
#3
Posted 12 November 2012 - 11:31 PM
Estro, on 12 November 2012 - 11:22 PM, said:
Oh dear god, what is wrong with you people???
#4
Posted 12 November 2012 - 11:32 PM
Whatever we are doing isn't working. The defense really needs to step up to justify keeping stache around
#5
Posted 12 November 2012 - 11:33 PM
#6
Posted 12 November 2012 - 11:43 PM
#7
Posted 12 November 2012 - 11:46 PM
#8
Posted 12 November 2012 - 11:50 PM
#9
Posted 12 November 2012 - 11:55 PM
#11
Posted 13 November 2012 - 12:09 AM
If this team brings in a new coordinator it has to be a 43 guy. You cannot be successful moving from 34 to 43 to 34 every year
#12
Posted 13 November 2012 - 10:14 AM
Estro, on 12 November 2012 - 11:22 PM, said:
Something about hiring a guy who just fired himself doesn't seem quite right.
#14
Posted 14 November 2012 - 12:05 AM
Numerous teams have turned the defense around in one season.
BTW, I haven't read too much around here since Sunday's loss but did anyone notice how different the Bills defense looked from the first Cheatriots*** game to this one?
On virtually every play, one of our DEs was standing up.
On numerous plays the defensive front shifted just before the snap.
We stunted and blitzed a lot more.
We used quite a bit of the creep technique in our front 7.
However like the last game, we stuck with our nickel/dime and Sheppard and Bradham saw very few snaps. Like the first game it was Barnett and Scott at linebacker most of the time.
And yet we only gave up 4 yards per rush this time compared to over 6 yards in the first game.
Wanny finally did some scheming.
#16
Posted 14 November 2012 - 01:20 AM
San Jose Bills Fan, on 14 November 2012 - 12:05 AM, said:
Numerous teams have turned the defense around in one season.
BTW, I haven't read too much around here since Sunday's loss but did anyone notice how different the Bills defense looked from the first Cheatriots*** game to this one?
On virtually every play, one of our DEs was standing up.
On numerous plays the defensive front shifted just before the snap.
We stunted and blitzed a lot more.
We used quite a bit of the creep technique in our front 7.
However like the last game, we stuck with our nickel/dime and Sheppard and Bradham saw very few snaps. Like the first game it was Barnett and Scott at linebacker most of the time.
And yet we only gave up 4 yards per rush this time compared to over 6 yards in the first game.
Wanny finally did some scheming.
The Patriots chose to throw to whever Barnett was assigned to cover instead of running the ball. At least to some degree anyways. If I am to look on the positive Mario and KW both made plays in the run game.
#17
Posted 15 November 2012 - 12:30 AM
Captain Hindsight, on 12 November 2012 - 11:50 PM, said:
Edited by GRONK SPIKE!, 15 November 2012 - 12:31 AM.
#18
Posted 15 November 2012 - 03:31 AM
Estro, on 12 November 2012 - 11:22 PM, said:
#19
Posted 15 November 2012 - 10:22 AM
Captain Hindsight, on 12 November 2012 - 11:50 PM, said:
What are you talking about? If its SPYGATE you have it backwards it was the OFFENSE that learned the other teams Defense plays.. The Pats D never knew the O scheme (how could you steal those signals? they are sent in via radio)
#20
Posted 15 November 2012 - 10:56 AM
Estro, on 12 November 2012 - 11:22 PM, said:
Hasn't this guy failed enough already? Why don't we go after someone who has succeeded for once?











