I usually disagree with the Chan detractors
#1
Posted 16 November 2012 - 12:40 AM
Did we even call one run with CJ in the game?
Most of the time, I understand why he does what the does in certain situations. But tonight, CJ was running all over everyone, and he didn't even try to switch it up in the RZ. He just continued on the same plays that didn't work.
#2
Posted 16 November 2012 - 12:42 AM
#3
Posted 16 November 2012 - 12:46 AM
TheNewBills, on 16 November 2012 - 12:42 AM, said:
Tonight he did not go five wide. Frequently he kept a rb in the backfield to help block against the Miami blitzes. The Bills ran on third and one at least twice tonight and got stuffed both times. CJ was great, but he got stuffed several times in the backfield. You cant run all time time, especially when the defense is stuffing the box the way Miami was tonight.
#4
Posted 16 November 2012 - 12:51 AM
#5
Posted 16 November 2012 - 01:09 AM
BlueFire, on 16 November 2012 - 12:40 AM, said:
Did we even call one run with CJ in the game?
Most of the time, I understand why he does what the does in certain situations. But tonight, CJ was running all over everyone, and he didn't even try to switch it up in the RZ. He just continued on the same plays that didn't work.
I got a love/hate thing for Chan...I think he has built a good offense, but he is too stubborn at times...and maybe, just too loyal to certain players. I have nothing against Tashard Choice, but there were just times tonight where he was just a momentum killer...and don't get me started on the wild-cat...it becomes less and less effective by the week...but he still calls it at the most inopportune times...sometimes I just think he tries to be too clever...and it pretty much never works.
The refusal to give the bal to Spillerl in the red zone tonight was crazy. I loved the win, and they have looked pretty good tonight in most facets of the game...but Chan just seems to be fixated on notions rather than the facts that are presenting themselves before his very eyes. It is frustrating. I think it cost the Bills at least one game (Titans) and almost cost them the Cards game. Tonights' game was much closer than it should have been, and I think Chan's play calling contributed to that.
#6
Posted 16 November 2012 - 01:24 AM
The Dolphins stacked the line and even doubled CJ out of the backfield.
Not sure why he had Choice and not Brad Smith in the Wildcat. Back shoulder and sideline deep throws were plentiful tonight - isn't that what this board wanted???
No idea why after a time-out Choice was still on the field in the red-zone right before the half. Yes he may be a better blocker but the threat of CJ out of the backfield may loosen up the coverage.
Looks like the defense was not going to let CJ and Chandler win the game. So Chan and Fitz dialed some plays for the wideouts against suspect corners. Nothing wrong with that idea and it worked great. Dolphins D was good in the red-zone. Tip your hat to them and get ready for the Colts.
#7
Posted 16 November 2012 - 01:42 AM
#9
Posted 16 November 2012 - 02:06 AM
#10
Posted 16 November 2012 - 02:16 AM
Buftex, on 16 November 2012 - 01:09 AM, said:
I got a love/hate thing for Chan...I think he has built a good offense, but he is too stubborn at times...and maybe, just too loyal to certain players. I have nothing against Tashard Choice, but there were just times tonight where he was just a momentum killer...and don't get me started on the wild-cat...it becomes less and less effective by the week...but he still calls it at the most inopportune times...sometimes I just think he tries to be too clever...and it pretty much never works.
The refusal to give the bal to Spillerl in the red zone tonight was crazy. I loved the win, and they have looked pretty good tonight in most facets of the game...but Chan just seems to be fixated on notions rather than the facts that are presenting themselves before his very eyes. It is frustrating. I think it cost the Bills at least one game (Titans) and almost cost them the Cards game. Tonights' game was much closer than it should have been, and I think Chan's play calling contributed to that.
This sums up my feelings about Chan perfectly.
Every play he called on third down was an absolute ridiculous play call.
His play-calling is starting to remind me of Mike Mullarkey.......yeah, it's that bad!
Edited by Special K, 16 November 2012 - 02:17 AM.
#11
Posted 16 November 2012 - 02:52 AM
#12
Posted 16 November 2012 - 04:09 AM
bbb, on 16 November 2012 - 01:42 AM, said:
Couldn't believe it either, it's like chan does great on 1st and 2nd down but way over thinks third and redzone and self-destructs.
Buftex, on 16 November 2012 - 01:09 AM, said:
The refusal to give the bal to Spillerl in the red zone tonight was crazy. I loved the win, and they have looked pretty good tonight in most facets of the game...but Chan just seems to be fixated on notions rather than the facts that are presenting themselves before his very eyes. It is frustrating. I think it cost the Bills at least one game (Titans) and almost cost them the Cards game. Tonights' game was much closer than it should have been, and I think Chan's play calling contributed to that.
don't forget having TJ run that route last week when he had not run it before. We should have beat NE and Tenn and be 6-4 might make the playoffs but as usual we will come up short and win just enough games to miss out on a top QB again.
#13
Posted 16 November 2012 - 04:19 AM
If somebody was trying to lose or get fired, this would be the way to do it.
#15
Posted 16 November 2012 - 06:02 AM
I'll add this - I don't remember this happening much (except for Choice and the failing Wildcat) if at all; last year - I'd love to know what's changed.
If I owned an NFL team I would walk down to the sidelines and fire my coach right in the middle of the game if they lined up empty-backfield on 3rd and short. Why in Hades would you give up the threat of a run, particularly when your team is among the best running the ball?
Edited by BobChalmers, 16 November 2012 - 06:02 AM.
#16
Posted 16 November 2012 - 06:23 AM
#17
Posted 16 November 2012 - 06:41 AM
Thank god the bills defense is so dominant.
#18
Posted 16 November 2012 - 06:42 AM
#19
Posted 17 November 2012 - 04:50 AM
BobChalmers, on 16 November 2012 - 06:02 AM, said:
I'll add this - I don't remember this happening much (except for Choice and the failing Wildcat) if at all; last year - I'd love to know what's changed.
If I owned an NFL team I would walk down to the sidelines and fire my coach right in the middle of the game if they lined up empty-backfield on 3rd and short. Why in Hades would you give up the threat of a run, particularly when your team is among the best running the ball?
That's what I've been wondering. What happened? He calls the worst plays at the worst times now!
#20
Posted 17 November 2012 - 10:12 AM
Coach Tuesday, on 16 November 2012 - 06:42 AM, said:
Excellent point, coach. If Nelson were healthy, things would be very different... the INT in the Pats game was pretty much the same play that went to Nelson for a TD against the Raiders last year.











