I dislike the Colts, but WOW... No call on Luck hit
#1
Posted 20 November 2012 - 01:44 PM
Regardless... I can't believe that nothing has been made of an illegal hit to Luck's chin during the Pats game. It was such a blatant foul, and it was replayed several times.
The Pats* defender got pressure on Luck. He got the ball away. The defender then leaves his feet, and hits Luck in the Chin with his helmet.... no flag.
Not only was there no flag, but the announcers in the booth talked right past it with each replay, not even acknowledging the blatant foul. Furthermore, I haven't been able to find any video to link to.
This REALLY irks me, and I will say again, I really dislike the Colts organization.
Did anyone else catch that, or have a link to the hit in question?
#2
Posted 20 November 2012 - 02:08 PM
#3
Posted 20 November 2012 - 02:10 PM
#4
Posted 20 November 2012 - 02:14 PM
#5
Posted 20 November 2012 - 02:23 PM
#6
Posted 20 November 2012 - 02:38 PM
#7
Posted 20 November 2012 - 02:44 PM
But if someone suggests using the Pats* own tactics against them, people here go nuts.
#8
Posted 20 November 2012 - 02:56 PM
#9
Posted 20 November 2012 - 03:00 PM
KD in CT, on 20 November 2012 - 02:44 PM, said:
But if someone suggests using the Pats* own tactics against them, people here go nuts.
I guess you're referring to the thread calling for a cheap shot to knock Brady out of the game. Are you really surprised that most fans find that offensive?
#11
Posted 21 November 2012 - 08:13 AM
#12
Posted 21 November 2012 - 08:28 AM
Oh and Luck already part of the protected QB club, he is considered the future of the NFL w rogers.
#13
Posted 21 November 2012 - 08:33 AM
Earlier in the game Mayo got a flag for a hit on luck that wasn't helmet to helmet, refs aren't perfect, it's not always a conspiracy.
#14
Posted 21 November 2012 - 08:33 AM
PatsFanNH, on 21 November 2012 - 08:28 AM, said:
Oh and Luck already part of the protected QB club, he is considered the future of the NFL w rogers.
Penalties 4-70 on the Putz? You call that the refs were doing EVERYTHING they could ??? BWAAA HAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAaaaaaa
You Pats fans are sooooo delusional.
Just remember they Cheatriots were 1-2 with the unbiased scab refs
Edited by BillsFan-4-Ever, 21 November 2012 - 08:35 AM.
#15
Posted 21 November 2012 - 08:48 AM
BillsFan-4-Ever, on 21 November 2012 - 08:33 AM, said:
You Pats fans are sooooo delusional.
Just remember they Cheatriots were 1-2 with the unbiased scab refs
You lost it... the Pats had 4 just on ONE O lineman! They had like 8 penalties before the Colts were called for ONE.. but hey whatever...
As for the "unbiased" refs.. only delusional Bills fans call them that, but lets see those Unbiased refs either "accidentally" made the wrong call or were biased against NE to have them lose those 2 games... And the Pats 3 losses COMBINED are by less than a TD...
#16
Posted 21 November 2012 - 11:31 AM
PatsFanNH, on 21 November 2012 - 08:28 AM, said:
Any thoughts on the guy leaving his feet to hit the QB high after he got rid of the ball?
Edited by BILLS_ROC, 21 November 2012 - 11:32 AM.
#17
Posted 21 November 2012 - 12:00 PM
PatsFanNH, on 21 November 2012 - 08:48 AM, said:
As for the "unbiased" refs.. only delusional Bills fans call them that, but lets see those Unbiased refs either "accidentally" made the wrong call or were biased against NE to have them lose those 2 games... And the Pats 3 losses COMBINED are by less than a TD...
Let me make it easy for you.
http://espn.go.com/n...ameId=321118017
COLTS Penalties 1-5 and PUTRIDS Penalties 4-70
You Pats fans are sooooo delusional.
Maybe if they hadn't run up the score the Ref might have let 1 or 2 go like they normally do
Here is the OFFICIAL NFL page
http://www.nfl.com/g...nalyze=boxscore
Penalties (Number-Yards) COLTS 1 - 5 , Penalties (Number-Yards) PUTRIDS 4 - 70
Don't you Putz Fans have a board of your own to post (TROLL) on?
Edited by BillsFan-4-Ever, 21 November 2012 - 11:59 AM.
#20
Posted 22 November 2012 - 06:52 PM










