Jump to content


Per ESPN Text, Gailey says CJ to get 60% snaps FJ 40%

fred jackson cj spiller chan gailey 2012

  • Please log in to reply
41 replies to this topic

#1 jboyst62

jboyst62

    Hall of Farmer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,357 posts

Posted 26 November 2012 - 05:42 PM

Per ESPN text, Gailey says that CJ Spiller will get 60% of the snaps, 40% to FJ.

What about Choice?  And more seriously, why not use them together at the same time!?

#2 GOBILLS78

GOBILLS78

    Animals. All of you.

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,941 posts

Posted 26 November 2012 - 05:44 PM

And of that 60 percent, 90 percent will be passes.

(Makes fart sound into hand)

#3 Mr. WEO

Mr. WEO

    All Pro

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,326 posts

Posted 26 November 2012 - 05:46 PM

So that's 12 for CJ and 8 for FJ..

#4 Alaska Darin

Alaska Darin

    Sniping at Retards from the Balcony

  • PPP Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 33,029 posts

Posted 26 November 2012 - 05:48 PM

Yeah, it matters now.  7 losses.

!@#$!

#5 theesir

theesir

    I Cho Cho Choose you!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,093 posts

Posted 26 November 2012 - 05:51 PM

He said this this morning on Howard Simon. He said 60-40 SNAPS, and reiterated not necessarily carries. Listening to him has become like listening to a crap fountain.

#6 Bangarang

Bangarang

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,517 posts

Posted 26 November 2012 - 05:59 PM

He waited until week 13 to start giving his best player majority of the snaps?

#7 Jim in Anchorage

Jim in Anchorage

    All Pro

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,623 posts

Posted 26 November 2012 - 06:02 PM

I  give up on the whole CJ vs FJ  Carry's thing. Yesterday CJ ripped off a 41 yard run. Do they then give it to FJ so CJ can catch a little air?  No he gets it again. Then again. There is  no logic here.

#8 Buftex

Buftex

    JIM KELLY: the reason for the seasons!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,732 posts

Posted 26 November 2012 - 06:19 PM

Per NFL Netwerk:  Chan Gailey says that coaching staff will "try more seriously" to win games.

#9 KollegeStudnet

KollegeStudnet

    on like a mofo

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,753 posts

Posted 26 November 2012 - 06:23 PM

to decipher what Chan is saying...

...7 carries for CJ
...6 carries for Fred
...55 passing attempts for Futz
...be down by 20 points by the 3rd qaurter!

It's like the screen play for every weekend for the past 3 years

View PostBuftex, on 26 November 2012 - 06:19 PM, said:

Per NFL Netwerk:  Chan Gailey says that coaching staff will "try more seriously" to win games.

I would've liked if they tried more seriously...a while ago

#10 marauderswr80

marauderswr80

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,640 posts

Posted 26 November 2012 - 06:28 PM

Chan can go F himself.....

They all can go F themselves! Worthless bunch of A-holes....

View PostBuftex, on 26 November 2012 - 06:19 PM, said:

Per NFL Netwerk:  Chan Gailey says that coaching staff will "try more seriously" to win games.

Huh? If that was seriously reported....im gonna puke!

#11 jboyst62

jboyst62

    Hall of Farmer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,357 posts

Posted 26 November 2012 - 06:30 PM

Why can't we just put both on the field?  Why keep your best athletes on the field?!  Screens can be run with two backs.

View Postmarauderswr80, on 26 November 2012 - 06:28 PM, said:

Huh? If that was seriously reported....im gonna puke!
Per Merrian Websters - Gulible is not in the dictionary.

#12 tgreg99

tgreg99

    Precisely!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,730 posts

Posted 26 November 2012 - 06:30 PM

View PostAlaska Darin, on 26 November 2012 - 05:48 PM, said:

Yeah, it matters now.  7 losses.

!@#$!
:lol: :lol:

#13 bills1960

bills1960

    RFA

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,385 posts

Posted 26 November 2012 - 06:36 PM

How does that game yesterday make you jump to a conclusion like that?! If anything Freddy's workload should be deducted after yesterday! I love Fred but he's lost that step as all RB's his age do. Gailey is just lost right now.

#14 Beerball

Beerball

    Things happen...

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 33,458 posts

Posted 26 November 2012 - 06:45 PM

Whoopdefreakindoo!

Look at the top gainers for Sunday and what stands out? One of them only received 14 carries. Gailey is a moron. The next lowest was 19 carries. Wonder what would happen if Spiller carried the ball another 5-10 times a game.

#15 drhockey

drhockey

    Practice Squad

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 138 posts

Posted 26 November 2012 - 06:48 PM

It's like sex panther cologne...

They've done studies, you know.  60% of the time, it works every time...

Edited by drhockey, 26 November 2012 - 06:57 PM.


#16 marauderswr80

marauderswr80

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,640 posts

Posted 26 November 2012 - 06:49 PM

View Postjboyst62, on 26 November 2012 - 06:30 PM, said:

Why can't we just put both on the field?  Why keep your best athletes on the field?!  Screens can be run with two backs.


Per Merrian Websters - Gulible is not in the dictionary.

Whats sad is id never put it past them! And you know its true!

#17 Buftex

Buftex

    JIM KELLY: the reason for the seasons!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,732 posts

Posted 26 November 2012 - 07:03 PM

View Postjboyst62, on 26 November 2012 - 06:30 PM, said:

Why can't we just put both on the field?  Why keep your best athletes on the field?!  Screens can be run with two backs.


Per Merrian Websters - Gulible is not in the dictionary.

:lol:


I guess it is time to hang up my "In Chan We Trust" t-shirt... I will hang it next to my Hank Bullough t-shirt that says "In Hank We Stank"

Edited by Buftex, 26 November 2012 - 07:06 PM.


#18 Marshawn's 20 bucks

Marshawn's 20 bucks

    UDFA

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 89 posts

Posted 26 November 2012 - 07:42 PM

CJ versus FJ is now a moot point. We have no shot. Ugggh So depressing. I keep telling myself that the team won't be good because the organisation is not good, and the organisation won't be good until Mr. Wilson or his heirs sell the team, but I keep thinking and hoping we'll get lucky. Why do I feel so dejected when my mind predicted this--my heart secretly hopes every year and every year I'm disappointed.

#19 jboyst62

jboyst62

    Hall of Farmer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,357 posts

Posted 26 November 2012 - 07:48 PM

View PostMarshawn, on 26 November 2012 - 07:42 PM, said:

CJ versus FJ is now a moot point. We have no shot. Ugggh So depressing. I keep telling myself that the team won't be good because the organisation is not good, and the organisation won't be good until Mr. Wilson or his heirs sell the team, but I keep thinking and hoping we'll get lucky. Why do I feel so dejected when my mind predicted this--my heart secretly hopes every year and every year I'm disappointed.
How can two players on the same team be against each other unless they are QB's?!  We can put both of these guys on the field.

#20 Beerball

Beerball

    Things happen...

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 33,458 posts

Posted 26 November 2012 - 07:51 PM

View Postjboyst62, on 26 November 2012 - 07:48 PM, said:

How can two players on the same team be against each other unless they are QB's?!  We can put both of these guys on the field.
It's not in Chan's voluminous playbook. Tavaris Jackson has read the entire work and he's confirmed "no plays with 2 RBs on the field" at once unless both are split wide due to a Ruvell Martin injury.

Stop trying to make sense out of nonsense.





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: fred jackson, cj spiller, chan gailey, 2012