Chan's statements
#1
Posted 11 December 2012 - 03:17 PM
He repeated and confirmed his statement that he decided against the field goal when he learned it was 52 yards instead of 50.
He stated it was "Fred's turn" as a partial explanation as to why one of the NFL's most dynamic backs gets 8 total touches
His explanation as to the mangling of clock management & play calling at the end of first half, was in part that they had called a screen pass that they had not used before, and did not expect the Rams to stuff it. This from a coach who has used the screen pass more than any NFL team in recent weeks. He was shocked the Rams were expecting it.
WOW
#2
Posted 11 December 2012 - 03:22 PM
#3
Posted 11 December 2012 - 03:23 PM
PTR
#4
Posted 11 December 2012 - 03:24 PM
#5
Posted 11 December 2012 - 03:24 PM
#6
Posted 11 December 2012 - 03:29 PM
#7
Posted 11 December 2012 - 03:32 PM
#8
Posted 12 December 2012 - 09:58 AM
Hatszel, on 11 December 2012 - 03:32 PM, said:
You know the name of a college, but can't spell or pluralize words. Go back to school fool.
#9
Posted 12 December 2012 - 10:34 AM
Dr. Trooth, on 11 December 2012 - 03:22 PM, said:
#10
Posted 12 December 2012 - 11:02 AM
#12
Posted 12 December 2012 - 11:18 AM
Dr. Trooth, on 11 December 2012 - 03:22 PM, said:
#13
Posted 12 December 2012 - 11:33 AM
#15
Posted 12 December 2012 - 11:46 AM
zow2, on 12 December 2012 - 11:40 AM, said:
Andy Griffith and the Mayberry Bills... Nix can be Goober and Wanny seems like an Otis Campbell.
Shazam!!
#16
Posted 12 December 2012 - 12:10 PM
vegas55, on 11 December 2012 - 03:17 PM, said:
The only thing I'll defend Chan on is this, and only partially. He emphasized that it was a screen they hadn't showed to anyone all year (presumably that includes preseason). So there was no film on it for the Rams to study. Yes, the Bills screen all the time, and yes, teams have been sitting on those screens more in the last few weeks, so I don't give Chan a pass on this one. But he's generally good with the screen game (a Pats-fan friend of mine always says Chan's the best in the league at screens), and the Bills run a lot of different screens. Even if the D knows that the next play is a screen pass, and even if they know it's going to a RB, they can still easily get burned by some of the fancier misdirection screens we sometimes run. So I don't think it's crazy for Chan to defend that call by saying that they hadn't run that particular play yet this season. Full disclosure: I didn't see the play in question, and I'm assuming it was something that played off of plays we've run a lot before -- i.e., make the D think it's a play they prepared for, then surprise them.
Anyway, I completely share the outrage over Chan's other comments. Really just indefensible, and very frustrating to listen to. Beyond everything else, I'm sick of hearing about how close we are. We heard that under Jauron, too. When bad teams play other bad teams, it shouldn't be surprising that the games are close at the end. But whether we barely win or barely lose, we're still a bad team. We played like a good team against KC, Cleveland, Jacksonville, and parts of the NE games, and that's it. Arizona and Miami were absolute garbage when we played them -- if we'd played well at all, we'd have won both games by 2+ TDs.
#17
Posted 12 December 2012 - 12:26 PM
Dr. Trooth, on 11 December 2012 - 03:22 PM, said:
Sometimes when I watch him coach and hear what he says, (and see that terrible beard) I think he has a drug or alcohol problem. No sane, sober person could seemingly say and/or do all the ridiculous stuff he does. I think they should test him. I'm not even kidding.
JPS, on 12 December 2012 - 11:02 AM, said:
No it wouldn't. When you win the fans expect more. Look at the Ravens canning their OC. Teams dedicated to winning expect to win, and demand winning. 8-5, that's not great either. It's average.
#18
Posted 12 December 2012 - 12:30 PM
#19
Posted 12 December 2012 - 12:35 PM
RyanC883, on 12 December 2012 - 12:26 PM, said:
No it wouldn't. When you win the fans expect more. Look at the Ravens canning their OC. Teams dedicated to winning expect to win, and demand winning. 8-5, that's not great either. It's average.
Great point. I've become so accustomed to losing that I wouldn't even know what to do with myself if were 8-5 at this point in a season....
#20
Posted 12 December 2012 - 12:56 PM
smuvtalker, on 12 December 2012 - 12:35 PM, said:
sure you would. You (and I) would expect to get blown out in three straight games. Duh!












