With the defense rising, does Wanny get another shot?
#1
Posted 11 December 2012 - 08:58 PM
That includes 14th against the pass, 28th against the run, and now 12th in sacks.
Yes, we've been playing crappier teams lately, but that's how it works: over the course of a season, you play some good teams, some bad teams. Perhaps the other teams just played the crappier teams earlier in the season than we did.
Yes, the defense still gives up the big drive and TD when it matters most at the end of games, but the defense played extremely well all game and should not have been put in that position (CHAN) so late in the game. Yes, it would be great if they could have made one play to seal the win (I'm looking at you, George), but it doesn't eliminate the improvement we've seen in the defense. It's not a championship defense by any stretch, but it's becoming the kind of defense that, with some real LBs and continued improvement, could certainly carry us to the playoffs next year.
So does Wanny deserve another shot next year?
If Chan goes, Wanny likely goes with him. Is that enough to argue to keep Chan around for one more year?
#2
Posted 11 December 2012 - 09:00 PM
#3
Posted 11 December 2012 - 09:22 PM
#4
Posted 11 December 2012 - 09:36 PM
That said, Wanny and Chan will be back.
#5
Posted 11 December 2012 - 09:57 PM
And the officials gave New England first and goal to go from the one yard line three times against the Bills.
In truth the Bills D played pretty well in the second New England game, certainly WAY BETTER than Houston's much-balleyhooed defense.
The Bills only allowed 347 yards to New England.
The last bad game the Bills D played was in week 7 against Tennessee.
It's too bad that George Wilson has dropped two game ending (winning) interceptions or the Bills defense would look a lot better.
I hope he's apologized to the team for costing them two games this season.
#7
Posted 11 December 2012 - 10:22 PM
#8
Posted 11 December 2012 - 10:30 PM
It takes time. The players are starting to "fit it up." They are like one play a week away from being a noteworthy group. Keep Byrd, add a vet LB in FA (Daryl smith!) and truly I think replacing Wilson at safety helps clean up the LB play. It's not far off, don't blow it up.
#9
Posted 11 December 2012 - 10:39 PM
San Jose Bills Fan, on 11 December 2012 - 09:57 PM, said:
And the officials gave New England first and goal to go from the one yard line three times against the Bills.
In truth the Bills D played pretty well in the second New England game, certainly WAY BETTER than Houston's much-balleyhooed defense.
The Bills only allowed 347 yards to New England.
The last bad game the Bills D played was in week 7 against Tennessee.
It's too bad that George Wilson has dropped two game ending (winning) interceptions or the Bills defense would look a lot better.
I hope he's apologized to the team for costing them two games this season.
Mark Vader, on 11 December 2012 - 10:21 PM, said:
Better than the Patriots? I'd say they are on par with them.
Wilson doesn't need to apologize to anyone.
The pats D destroyed the Texans on MNF. The Bills D couldn't keep a lead with 2 minutes left against the Rams. That's not "on par".
#10
Posted 11 December 2012 - 10:45 PM
NoSaint, on 11 December 2012 - 10:30 PM, said:
It takes time. The players are starting to "fit it up." They are like one play a week away from being a noteworthy group. Keep Byrd, add a vet LB in FA (Daryl smith!) and truly I think replacing Wilson at safety helps clean up the LB play. It's not far off, don't blow it up.
Since you are in the bayou area you should be familiar with LSU players. What is your take on Sheppard? I thought he was going to be a very solid player. So far he seems to be invisible or low impact in many games. At this point I'm disappointed in him.
I understand that a lot of people are jumping to a premature judgment on Brooks, the CB from LSU. Going against the grain I though he was the best value pick in last year's draft. I still believe that he can be a contributor for us.
Edited by JohnC, 11 December 2012 - 10:47 PM.
#11
Posted 11 December 2012 - 11:02 PM
Mr. WEO, on 11 December 2012 - 10:39 PM, said:
The pats D destroyed the Texans on MNF. The Bills D couldn't keep a lead with 2 minutes left against the Rams. That's not "on par".
Let me put it this way: If I had dropped two EASY interceptions which would have preserved victory in two separate games, I would have apologized profusely to the team. Twice.
I think most accountable people would. I don't know why you would say "Wilson doesn't need to apologize to anyone."
Would you apologize if you let victory slip through your fingers? Apparently not.
As for as your second point, What does the Bills game against the Rams have to do with my point about the Bills defense outperforming Houston's in their respective games against New England?
I'm not understanding your point.
#12
Posted 11 December 2012 - 11:15 PM
#13
Posted 11 December 2012 - 11:43 PM
#14
Posted 12 December 2012 - 01:10 AM
Its clear that when our DL goes so does everyone else!
Its a thin line for wanny...he gets another year with a leash around his neck!
#15
Posted 12 December 2012 - 04:12 AM
#16
Posted 12 December 2012 - 05:26 AM
Rubes, on 11 December 2012 - 08:58 PM, said:
That includes 14th against the pass, 28th against the run, and now 12th in sacks.
Yes, we've been playing crappier teams lately, but that's how it works: over the course of a season, you play some good teams, some bad teams. Perhaps the other teams just played the crappier teams earlier in the season than we did.
Yes, the defense still gives up the big drive and TD when it matters most at the end of games, but the defense played extremely well all game and should not have been put in that position (CHAN) so late in the game. Yes, it would be great if they could have made one play to seal the win (I'm looking at you, George), but it doesn't eliminate the improvement we've seen in the defense. It's not a championship defense by any stretch, but it's becoming the kind of defense that, with some real LBs and continued improvement, could certainly carry us to the playoffs next year.
So does Wanny deserve another shot next year?
If Chan goes, Wanny likely goes with him. Is that enough to argue to keep Chan around for one more year?
Keep chan for another year No, but maybe the new HC keeps him as this is his first year as DC here and the D has totally turned itself around, although allowing the game winning drive is still a bit worrisome.
#17
Posted 12 December 2012 - 06:04 AM
Meathead, on 11 December 2012 - 11:43 PM, said:
UConn James, on 12 December 2012 - 04:12 AM, said:
#18
Posted 12 December 2012 - 07:37 AM
#19
Posted 12 December 2012 - 07:37 AM
San Jose Bills Fan, on 11 December 2012 - 11:02 PM, said:
I think most accountable people would. I don't know why you would say "Wilson doesn't need to apologize to anyone."
Would you apologize if you let victory slip through your fingers? Apparently not.
As for as your second point, What does the Bills game against the Rams have to do with my point about the Bills defense outperforming Houston's in their respective games against New England?
I'm not understanding your point.
On the first point, while it would have been great if he had also intercepted those passes, as others have pointed out, Wilson prevented a completion by the WR, which he is supposed to do. Contrast this to Rogers and McK (who got totally smoked at the line), who gave up a 4th and 1 9 yards pass with under 2 minutes to go. Or Brooks, who got burned on the TD that lost us the game--and McK (again) who didn't bother to cover on the 2 point conversion? Why wouldn't you demand apologies from these guys--who's poor play actually lost the game for us?
As for the second point, as you can see, I was responding to Mark Vader, not you. He was claiming that the Bills and pats D's are currently "on par" with eachother. I assumed anyone who saw the last performance of each D would never make that claim.
#20
Posted 12 December 2012 - 07:56 AM
We can argue that the D has gotten better or whether or not they're better than the Giants or Patriots, but it won't matter if Gailey is let go. All bets are off if he's fired.











