Alex Smith might be easier to get than expected
#1
Posted 13 January 2013 - 04:02 AM
The question is basically, is it worth a shot at getting a deal done after league year begins, or to eventually find out there is not a sufficient trade market for Smith, and be stuck releasing him before April 1, and pay him $2 million in dead money.
Below is a chart of what would be saved vs. dead money for both cutting Smith and trading Smith."
http://www.ninersnat...olin-kaepernick
#2
Posted 13 January 2013 - 04:12 AM
#3
Posted 13 January 2013 - 05:49 AM
#4
Posted 13 January 2013 - 07:11 AM
#5
Posted 13 January 2013 - 07:49 AM
#6
Posted 13 January 2013 - 08:02 AM
#7
Posted 13 January 2013 - 08:03 AM
#8
Posted 13 January 2013 - 08:47 AM
Hater, on 13 January 2013 - 04:12 AM, said:
The problem, at least as I see it, is that there are only very shaky QBs in this draft with each being a long-shot to develop into a good starting QB. I'd rather have Alex Smith for a few years, take a flyer on a rookie to see if we get lucky and (assuming we don't) then go all-in next year to get a better rookie prospect. Alex Smith isn't Tom Brady, but he could be a winner with a great D and running game - exactly what the Bills are trying to build (and they have a lot of the parts).
#9
Posted 13 January 2013 - 08:50 AM
machine gun kelly, on 13 January 2013 - 08:02 AM, said:
This is my new favorite typo of all time.
#10
Posted 13 January 2013 - 09:02 AM
#12
Posted 13 January 2013 - 09:08 AM
OldTimer1960, on 13 January 2013 - 08:47 AM, said:
He'd certainly be an upgrade over what we have now. I'd rather see him start next year than any of the available rookies in the draft. Wouldn't bother me a bit to see Alex in a Bills uniform.
https://www.youtube....h?v=PbxMz5h11CU
jb
Edited by jaybee, 13 January 2013 - 09:19 AM.
#13
Posted 13 January 2013 - 09:10 AM
OldTimer1960, on 13 January 2013 - 08:47 AM, said:
An entirely sensible position. I expect you to be derided soundly for it here on TBD.
#14
Posted 13 January 2013 - 09:10 AM
Edited by Hsp08, 13 January 2013 - 09:11 AM.
#15
Posted 13 January 2013 - 09:10 AM
#17
Posted 13 January 2013 - 10:05 AM
There are at least 6 other teams looking for a starting QB, and from Alex Smith's view, the only team that has a clear opening for a veteran starter would be the Jets.
Everyone here seems to think Fitz's release is immenent. We all get that Fitz sucks. But the reality is, the current Bills OC spent a full season with Fitz in 2009 when he started 8 games. So, Hackett certainly has a frame of reference on him. It could be the kiss of death, or a thumbs up. What we think mght happen is an aggressive and styfling defense and an agressive offense with a no huddle approach. If that's the case, doesn't that type of scenario work more to Fitz advantage?
#18
Posted 13 January 2013 - 10:06 AM
#19
Posted 13 January 2013 - 10:11 AM
OldTimer1960, on 13 January 2013 - 08:47 AM, said:
I see your point but do you really want another game manger, I frankly don't & next years isn't much better other than Aaron Murray & Johnny Manziel & that means another losing season I rather take a chance on a Rookie Gunslinger like Tyler Wilson than just the same thing we have now
#20
Posted 13 January 2013 - 10:21 AM
Hater, on 13 January 2013 - 10:11 AM, said:
I am not saying that they shouldn't draft a QB, just that they need someone (besides that rookie) to start this year and perhaps longer. From everything that I have seen and read, there are no really good "rookie gunslingers" coming out in this draft. It happens - some years there are no good NFL QB prospects in the draft. What we've seen recently with strong QB drafts is the exception rather than the rule.











