Now that the coaching carousel has stopped-- how did the Bills do?
#1
Posted 18 January 2013 - 11:49 AM
For me, after evaluating the situation, there are few guys who were hired that I would rather have than Marrone. And the fact that guys I did not mind like Lovie and Whiz were passed over tells me something about them. So I guess I am pretty happy with the hire.
#2
Posted 18 January 2013 - 11:51 AM
#3
Posted 18 January 2013 - 11:55 AM
CodeMonkey, on 18 January 2013 - 11:51 AM, said:
#4
Posted 18 January 2013 - 11:58 AM
#5
Posted 18 January 2013 - 11:59 AM
#6
Posted 18 January 2013 - 12:12 PM
Rubes, on 18 January 2013 - 11:58 AM, said:
A task made much easier with NFL-caliber players.
#7
Posted 18 January 2013 - 12:18 PM
#8
Posted 18 January 2013 - 12:26 PM
#10
Posted 18 January 2013 - 12:34 PM
PTR
Edited by PromoTheRobot, 18 January 2013 - 12:34 PM.
#11
Posted 18 January 2013 - 12:37 PM
CodeMonkey, on 18 January 2013 - 11:51 AM, said:
My question is not really how this will turn out-- of course we won't know for a while if this was a good hire. My question goes more to how the Bills conducted business with this hIre. Was there a difference than in the past? Did they do a good job of finding and getting someone who has real potential as compared to what othe teams did? Hindsight is 20/20, how did they do now under the circumstances in hiring a new coach?
PromoTheRobot, on 18 January 2013 - 12:34 PM, said:
PTR
#12
Posted 18 January 2013 - 12:48 PM
#13
Posted 18 January 2013 - 12:56 PM
#14
Posted 18 January 2013 - 12:59 PM
Casey D, on 18 January 2013 - 12:37 PM, said:
Marrones record at cuse was .500. Not exactly stellar. Except for the ex-Jets I know little to nothing about the other hires, including Marrone himself.
I did not want any failed NFL HC so Lovey and Whiz were not popular choices for me, However there are some interesting guys that have potential to be HC candidates that are still in the playoffs and it would not have hurt to look at them. Perhaps the Bills did and decided they liked Marrone best and that would be great. But it feels like the Bills were afraid with all the HC positions available that if they did not act fast they would have been stuck with another Gailey hire. With all the unknowns in the hires I certainly am not going to call it a big win for the Bills, but at the same calling it a bust is equally as silly.
So basically I am ambivalent and am in the "wait and see" mode.
Edited by CodeMonkey, 18 January 2013 - 01:13 PM.
#15
Posted 18 January 2013 - 01:00 PM
PromoTheRobot, on 18 January 2013 - 12:34 PM, said:
PTR
You forgot to complain about them hiring the cheapest coach out there.
#16
Posted 18 January 2013 - 01:08 PM
#17
Posted 18 January 2013 - 01:08 PM
PromoTheRobot, on 18 January 2013 - 12:34 PM, said:
PTR
#18
Posted 18 January 2013 - 01:15 PM
PromoTheRobot, on 18 January 2013 - 12:34 PM, said:
PTR
How did you get hold of Jerry Sullivan's article template?
#19
Posted 18 January 2013 - 01:17 PM
@ codemonkey...I don't see his .500 record as bad...he had no talent knocking on Syracuse's door to play...I can't imagine it was easy to find high lvl players to recruit for a team that totally tanked under Robinson...yet he still went to 2 bowl games in his 4 years and won 1...If/when Ryan Nassib gets drafted , it'll be the 1st QB drafted out of Syracuse since McNabb in the 90's...so basically it's not like he had Alabama's recruiting class to work with
#20
Posted 18 January 2013 - 01:28 PM











