#1
Posted 05 February 2013 - 06:32 PM
#2
Posted 05 February 2013 - 07:19 PM
#3
Posted 05 February 2013 - 07:20 PM
#4
Posted 05 February 2013 - 07:20 PM
#5
Posted 05 February 2013 - 07:20 PM
#6
Posted 05 February 2013 - 07:23 PM
Captain Hindsight, on 05 February 2013 - 07:20 PM, said:
#7
Posted 05 February 2013 - 07:24 PM
#8
Posted 05 February 2013 - 07:29 PM
#10
Posted 05 February 2013 - 07:41 PM
#11
Posted 05 February 2013 - 07:43 PM
"Has one coverage skills, "
and this
"One coverage skill would be one more than our LB's seem to have now..."
And not least, this
" I'd prefer a LB with two coverage skills..."
and then this "Is he affordable? Would be an immediate upgrade... "
D is the answer, i bet
#12
Posted 05 February 2013 - 07:45 PM
#13
Posted 05 February 2013 - 07:58 PM
Captain Hindsight, on 05 February 2013 - 07:20 PM, said:
He started 11 games and had a hamstring injury he played in all 16. A healthy boley wouldnt be a bad pickup
#15
Posted 06 February 2013 - 11:01 AM
#17
Posted 06 February 2013 - 12:42 PM
He was a very solid player for Atlanta. 31 does not scare me too much for a LB. As long as he is healthy. having a LB with coverage can only help...
"Michael Boley was brought here as a fast, athletic, versatile linebacker," coach Tom Coughlin said. "We recognized his special skills were in coverage. He's a smart player who made some big plays for us. He was an integral part of our Super Bowl XLVI championship team. Michael played outstanding football down the stretch for us that season."
Sounds like the kind of guy we need for a year or two to help guys like Bradham develope. The Bills still would need a LB or two in the draft.
#18
Posted 06 February 2013 - 01:00 PM
#19
Posted 06 February 2013 - 01:30 PM
#20
Posted 06 February 2013 - 07:13 PM
Sisyphean Bills, on 06 February 2013 - 10:38 AM, said:
pulled from our own bills fan atlbillsfan1975
Tom Coughlin said. "We recognized his special { skills ] were in coverage. "
lol : )











