Gil Brandt of NFL.com evaluates College QBs by Numbers
#1
Posted 13 February 2013 - 12:12 PM
#2
Posted 13 February 2013 - 12:12 PM
#3
Posted 13 February 2013 - 12:22 PM
Can you sight me any examples of his accuracy on anything?
#4
Posted 13 February 2013 - 12:25 PM
#5
Posted 13 February 2013 - 12:28 PM
Jaysports36, on 13 February 2013 - 12:25 PM, said:
Pryor and Smith are completely different players. At this point, I have to think that some of the comparisons are something more than just lazy.
#6
Posted 13 February 2013 - 12:28 PM
Jaysports36, on 13 February 2013 - 12:25 PM, said:
How is it ignorant? Just because there are QBs coming out of this draft doesn't mean one of them is the answer to our long time QB issues. It's IGNORANT to just draft a QB every 4 years because we need a QB. I'd rather wait til the right QB comes around, draft him and start him day one. There's a smart way to approach this thing and drafting a QB in a WEAK QB class is not the answer.
#7
Posted 13 February 2013 - 12:40 PM
Check him out using analytics at the age of 80.
What an amazing guy.
The formula I used is a fairly accurate predictor of future success, but it's important to note that it's not the be-all, end-all of quarterback evaluation. It's crucial to watch game tape, to see these guys throw in person and to consider other factors, some of which I touched on in my comments about the individual prospects. This list doesn't even necessarily reflect how I would order these players when all those factors are taken into account. It merely represents one way to take stock of the quarterback talent that will be entering the league in 2013.
This is what is meant by "layering" analytics over scouting.
#8
Posted 13 February 2013 - 12:41 PM
I'm worried about WR and hope that it gets addressed in FA because it does not look like it will be in rounds 1 or 2 of the draft
CBF
#9
Posted 13 February 2013 - 12:42 PM
Everything Brandt had to say about Glennon, I agree with.
"There's no continuity when it comes to accuracy and ball placement."
Sounds like the same problem we have with our current QB.
#10
Posted 13 February 2013 - 12:49 PM
What good is arm strength if you cant get the ball to where it needs to be?
CBF
#11
Posted 13 February 2013 - 12:54 PM
#12
Posted 13 February 2013 - 12:59 PM
RyanC883, on 13 February 2013 - 12:54 PM, said:
I think WR is a bigger need at this point
CBF
#13
Posted 13 February 2013 - 01:03 PM
#14
Posted 13 February 2013 - 01:28 PM
#15
Posted 13 February 2013 - 01:37 PM
#16
Posted 13 February 2013 - 01:51 PM
Jaysports36, on 13 February 2013 - 12:25 PM, said:
#17
Posted 13 February 2013 - 03:01 PM
As an aside - I had never heard of Marquis Gray - but that dude looks every bit as worthy of a flyer as Bray - he looks to be as explosive as a Newton or Griffin, with the right mentoring... I really hope the Bills come out of this draft with 2 QB's - one with obvious starting ability, and one with huge upside, like Bray or this Gray kid.
#18
Posted 13 February 2013 - 03:13 PM
#19
Posted 13 February 2013 - 03:18 PM
KeisterHollow, on 13 February 2013 - 03:01 PM, said:
As an aside - I had never heard of Marquis Gray - but that dude looks every bit as worthy of a flyer as Bray - he looks to be as explosive as a Newton or Griffin, with the right mentoring... I really hope the Bills come out of this draft with 2 QB's - one with obvious starting ability, and one with huge upside, like Bray or this Gray kid.
Seriously?
You do realize Gray was a run 1st, heck almost run-exclusively, QB who was moved to WR his Sr year right? Bray may have some serious holes in his game. But he also may very well be the best pure pocket passer in this Draft...To say the two are equal QB projects is way, way, way out in left field...
#20
Posted 13 February 2013 - 03:24 PM
turftoe, on 13 February 2013 - 01:03 PM, said:
GET 'ER DONE
(If only Wang could have stuck on the OL with Wood and Levitre...
mabden, on 13 February 2013 - 12:42 PM, said:
Everything Brandt had to say about Glennon, I agree with.
"There's no continuity when it comes to accuracy and ball placement."
Sounds like the same problem we have with our current QB.
Speaking of Fitz, I loved the Tom Landry reference: "Tom Landry used to be of the opinion that accuracy couldn't be fixed; a quarterback who entered the NFL with accuracy issues wasn't likely to get any better,..."
Even when you bring in a mechanics-focused QB coach, apparently...











