Bills to let David Nelson walk?
#1
Posted 22 February 2013 - 08:12 PM
"Bills not expected to tender RFA WR David Nelson, who missed all but one game last season because of injury. Nelson expected to be healthy."
If this is accurate, can someone explain the thinking?
#2
Posted 22 February 2013 - 08:14 PM
#3
Posted 22 February 2013 - 08:17 PM
#4
Posted 22 February 2013 - 08:18 PM
They should have tendered him.
#5
Posted 22 February 2013 - 08:21 PM
I'd LOVE to hear the explanation of why Kelsay and Fitz are still on this Roster, but Nelson is not...
Edited by KOKBILLS, 22 February 2013 - 08:22 PM.
#6
Posted 22 February 2013 - 08:23 PM
#7
Posted 22 February 2013 - 08:26 PM
#8
Posted 22 February 2013 - 08:29 PM
Boooooooooooooo!!!!
#9
Posted 22 February 2013 - 08:30 PM
I try to keep an open mind, but I really don't like this one. If we are going with a younger QB than a TE is supposidly their best friend, and Nelson gets open in the short and mid range like a TE and blocks relatively well.
And now I can see him going to NE potentially since Belichek wanted him as an UDFA when he came out. Bad move all around.
#10
Posted 22 February 2013 - 08:30 PM
KOKBILLS, on 22 February 2013 - 08:21 PM, said:
Because their contracts have not expired yet.
The choice to cut somebody off the roster......and the choice to re-sign somebody onto the roster are two totally different animals.
#11
Posted 22 February 2013 - 08:32 PM
NickelCity, on 22 February 2013 - 08:26 PM, said:
This really make zero sense to me...The only possible explanation would be if the knee was no responding at all...Otherwise how do you not tender this Kid? He's a great Kid...He's been productive for his position as the #3 WR...He's REAL tall for a WR...And coming off the ACL, it's only going to take the minimum tender to retain him...This is a REAL head-scratcher to me...
Edited by KOKBILLS, 22 February 2013 - 11:16 PM.
#12
Posted 22 February 2013 - 08:33 PM
#13
Posted 22 February 2013 - 08:34 PM
Dibs, on 22 February 2013 - 08:30 PM, said:
Because their contracts have not expired yet.
The choice to cut somebody off the roster......and the choice to re-sign somebody onto the roster are two totally different animals.
True enough...Put that aside for a second...I thought the general idea is to improve the Roster...Kelsay and Fitz suck at their positions...Nelson is REAL good at his...WTF?
#14
Posted 22 February 2013 - 08:38 PM
#15
Posted 22 February 2013 - 08:39 PM
#16
Posted 22 February 2013 - 08:40 PM
#17
Posted 22 February 2013 - 08:40 PM
BuffalothruMyVeins, on 22 February 2013 - 08:30 PM, said:
I try to keep an open mind, but I really don't like this one. If we are going with a younger QB than a TE is supposidly their best friend, and Nelson gets open in the short and mid range like a TE and blocks relatively well.
And now I can see him going to NE potentially since Belichek wanted him as an UDFA when he came out. Bad move all around.
As suspect I am of the new regime.
Maybe Marrone and staff are truly a great (at least good) judge of NFL talent. In that case expect at least the first year to be typical Bills football. Meaning a lot of losses. But maybe a pre-cursor to finally some competent friggin NFL talent evaluation. And, a team that could win even their first wild card game, should it ever get that far.
Edited by Best Player Available, 22 February 2013 - 08:42 PM.
#20
Posted 22 February 2013 - 08:45 PM











