Manuel and Wilson are natural leaders...
#1
Posted 23 February 2013 - 06:44 PM
As for Nassib, he seems like a very likable and personable guy who will put in the work and do his very best. But I don't necessarily see that natural leader type, nor do I see a guy who actually believes that he's the best of this group.
One note, Wilson had a very interesting smile on his face when talking about his meeting with the Bills. You can check out all of the videos them here...
http://www.kcchiefs....81-0c999a80dd5e
Can't wait to see them all tomorrow at the combine.
#2
Posted 23 February 2013 - 06:58 PM
#3
Posted 23 February 2013 - 07:03 PM
#4
Posted 23 February 2013 - 07:11 PM
#5
Posted 24 February 2013 - 01:00 AM
Edited by DStebb716, 24 February 2013 - 01:01 AM.
#6
Posted 24 February 2013 - 02:34 AM
#7
Posted 24 February 2013 - 02:57 AM
Bangarang, on 23 February 2013 - 07:11 PM, said:
Yes, but is that an indication of EJ Manuel's shortcomings as a QB, or more a reflection of how Jimbo Fisher likes to run his offense? I have heard folks make arguments about the latter.
#8
Posted 24 February 2013 - 03:02 AM
#9
Posted 24 February 2013 - 05:33 AM
#10
Posted 24 February 2013 - 02:22 PM
Lincoln Osiris, on 24 February 2013 - 03:02 AM, said:
Is that to say he's one of a group of many tranquil people under pressure, you know, for all intensive purposes?
Edited by transient, 24 February 2013 - 02:28 PM.
#11
Posted 24 February 2013 - 02:32 PM
PTR
#12
Posted 24 February 2013 - 02:38 PM
#14
Posted 24 February 2013 - 02:48 PM
Johnny Hammersticks, on 24 February 2013 - 02:57 AM, said:
No idea what it could be an indication of but it is something that I've noticed.
#15
Posted 24 February 2013 - 02:50 PM
#16
Posted 24 February 2013 - 02:52 PM
#17
Posted 24 February 2013 - 02:53 PM
transient, on 24 February 2013 - 02:22 PM, said:
The phrase originated in legal language in the 1500s, and it may have been first used in court cases in England. The initial wording may have been "to all intents, constructions and purposes." Some point out that pluralizing "intent" is unnecessary since the word can be singular or plural without an "s" at the end, such as "his intent" or "their intent."
In the modern sense, this phrase could be used in the following example. A person is interviewing for a job, and the boss wants to hire him. She might say, "We still need to check your references, but for all intents and purposes, the job is yours." Provided the applicants references are fine, he has landed the job and, under practical considerations, he can consider himself employed.
Unfortunately, the phrase has gotten a little more complicated because of the numerous misquotes or malapropisms that are used in its place. One common substitution is "for all intensive purposes." This is very commonly used, and it means something almost directly opposite to the original phrase’s meaning of "for practical purposes."
If the person who was just about hired for a job "for all intensive purposes," one could argue that that person had just been hired for work in an emergency room or an intensive care unit. The person could only be considering the prospect of a job under intensive or highly intense situations. Now, this is probably not what the speaker means, but it deliberately corrupts the meaning of the original phrase.
#18
Posted 24 February 2013 - 03:05 PM
Its pretty much a crap shoot at the QB position this year. I'll let you guys know who I like next December !! LOL !
jb
#20
Posted 24 February 2013 - 03:15 PM
SaratogaMike, on 24 February 2013 - 02:53 PM, said:
The phrase originated in legal language in the 1500s, and it may have been first used in court cases in England. The initial wording may have been "to all intents, constructions and purposes." Some point out that pluralizing "intent" is unnecessary since the word can be singular or plural without an "s" at the end, such as "his intent" or "their intent."
In the modern sense, this phrase could be used in the following example. A person is interviewing for a job, and the boss wants to hire him. She might say, "We still need to check your references, but for all intents and purposes, the job is yours." Provided the applicants references are fine, he has landed the job and, under practical considerations, he can consider himself employed.
Unfortunately, the phrase has gotten a little more complicated because of the numerous misquotes or malapropisms that are used in its place. One common substitution is "for all intensive purposes." This is very commonly used, and it means something almost directly opposite to the original phrase’s meaning of "for practical purposes."
If the person who was just about hired for a job "for all intensive purposes," one could argue that that person had just been hired for work in an emergency room or an intensive care unit. The person could only be considering the prospect of a job under intensive or highly intense situations. Now, this is probably not what the speaker means, but it deliberately corrupts the meaning of the original phrase.
Are you the guy that kills the punchline by making the teller explain the joke? (I'm on my iPad, otherwise I'd finish this with the little winking emoticon)











