14 replies to this topic

[Astrobot]

I suspect our positional needs (shown here for each team) have switched, so I am conducting a poll. This will affect future mock drafts on DraftTek. I have made it real by selecting players downstream from our picks in each round, using several mock drafts. I don't believe all players will go in the round specified; e.g., we may need to reach for Mike Glennon in RD1 b/c he won't be there at #41. I haven't included the option of drafting QB in RD3.

Which 3-rounder described below would you like most for improving this team with these coaches?


A: Draft QB, then WR, then OLB
Example Using Players Still Available IMHO:
1-Geno Smith Matt Barkley, Tyler Wilson, Mike Glennon QB
2-Justin Hunter, Robert Woods, DeAndre Hopkins WR
3-Chase Thomas  OLB43

B: Draft WR, then QB, then OLB
1-Cordarrelle Patterson, Keenan Allen, Tavon Austin WR
2-Ryan Nassib,  Tyler Bray, QB
3-Chase Thomas  OLB43


C: Draft OLB, then QB, then WR
1-Jarvis Jones, Sam Montgomery, Ogletree OLB34
2-Justin Hunter, Robert Woods, DeAndre Hopkins WR
3-E.J. Manuel, Landry Jones QB

D: Draft QB, then OLB, then WR
1-Geno Smith Matt Barkley, Tyler Wilson, Mike Glennon QB
2-Michael Buchanan, Khaseem Greene OLB
3-Quinton Patton, Tavarres King, Aaron Dobson, Stedman Bailey WR

You may certainly mix and match players; I'm more interested in seeing if our positional preferences have changed since last month.
--Astro

[BillsInMaine]

C

[DrDareustein]

This is a tough one because I feel our needs go:

1. QB
then in a distant second place...

2. WR/OLB

Both are equivalent needs, it just depends on who is there in the 2nd, and how the trends during the draft go.

[910BillsFan]

C

[BEAST MODE BABY!]

C, but you have C as OLB, WR then QB...so, you need to update that

[RyanC883]

If Dion Jordan or Olgetree is available, def. LB.  Otherwise, perhaps WR or DE.  At any rate, this draft should be interesting.  Even more so than most years, no one will have any idea what will happen until its happening.

[JPS]

I hate 'em all. The available players just don't fit. I hate Patterson idea. Geno Smith is just okay. Jones has spinal stenosis.  He got away with it in college, but he will be going up against bigger, faster dudes and I'd remove him from my draft board.

I'd go OL, QB, TE, but would be open to DL/LB in the 3rd.

[jboyst62]

C.

I would be curious to see a OLB/WR/QB.  I think some top WR's could slip to the 2nd with a frenzy on some positions like QB coming in the first.

[Dibs]

Astrobot, on 25 February 2013 - 05:08 PM, said:

I suspect our positional needs (shown here for each team) have switched, so I am conducting a poll. This will affect future mock drafts on DraftTek.

Do you really base your positional needs on what all of us idiots think?

[jaybee]

Dibs, on 25 February 2013 - 06:14 PM, said:

Do you really base your positional needs on what all of us idiots think?

I sure hope not.  Instant credibility killer !!

[San Jose Bills Fan]

I understand the intent of the poll but ultimately it comes down to an individual player, not a position group AFAIC.

But I did vote for C.

[jboyst62]

Dibs, on 25 February 2013 - 06:14 PM, said:

Do you really base your positional needs on what all of us idiots think?

Haha. You called yourself an idiot for being one of us!

[San Jose Bills Fan]

jboyst62, on 25 February 2013 - 09:26 PM, said:

Haha. You called yourself an idiot for being one of us!

Yep.

The joke's on…who is the joke on?

[Green Lightning]

Hummm,  option C I guess.  I want to like Barkley at #8 but just can't get there yet. Our LB's truly suck so let's start there.

[Dibs]

jboyst62, on 25 February 2013 - 09:26 PM, said:

Haha. You called yourself an idiot for being one of us!

Come to think of it.....my point would have been made clearer had I instead said....

"Do you really base your positional needs on what all of the idiots here think?"