Jump to content


Positional Needs for DraftTek - March


  • Please log in to reply
14 replies to this topic

Poll: DraftTek Positional Needs, March (49 member(s) have cast votes)

Which 3-Rounder would you pick?

  1. A: Draft QB, WR, then OLB (8 votes [16.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 16.33%

  2. B: Draft WR, QB, then OLB (12 votes [24.49%])

    Percentage of vote: 24.49%

  3. C: Draft OLB, QB, then WR (21 votes [42.86%])

    Percentage of vote: 42.86%

  4. D: Draft QB, then OLB, then WR (8 votes [16.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 16.33%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 Astrobot

Astrobot

    TSW's Draft Droid

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,203 posts

Posted 25 February 2013 - 05:08 PM

I suspect our positional needs (shown here for each team) have switched, so I am conducting a poll. This will affect future mock drafts on DraftTek. I have made it real by selecting players downstream from our picks in each round, using several mock drafts. I don't believe all players will go in the round specified; e.g., we may need to reach for Mike Glennon in RD1 b/c he won't be there at #41. I haven't included the option of drafting QB in RD3.

Which 3-rounder described below would you like most for improving this team with these coaches?


A: Draft QB, then WR, then OLB
Example Using Players Still Available IMHO:
1-Geno Smith Matt Barkley, Tyler Wilson, Mike Glennon QB
2-Justin Hunter, Robert Woods, DeAndre Hopkins WR
3-Chase Thomas  OLB43

B: Draft WR, then QB, then OLB
1-Cordarrelle Patterson, Keenan Allen, Tavon Austin WR
2-Ryan Nassib,  Tyler Bray, QB
3-Chase Thomas  OLB43


C: Draft OLB, then QB, then WR
1-Jarvis Jones, Sam Montgomery, Ogletree OLB34
2-Justin Hunter, Robert Woods, DeAndre Hopkins WR
3-E.J. Manuel, Landry Jones QB

D: Draft QB, then OLB, then WR
1-Geno Smith Matt Barkley, Tyler Wilson, Mike Glennon QB
2-Michael Buchanan, Khaseem Greene OLB
3-Quinton Patton, Tavarres King, Aaron Dobson, Stedman Bailey WR

You may certainly mix and match players; I'm more interested in seeing if our positional preferences have changed since last month.
--Astro

#2 BillsInMaine

BillsInMaine

    Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 291 posts

Posted 25 February 2013 - 05:32 PM

C

#3 DrDareustein

DrDareustein

    All Pro

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,638 posts

Posted 25 February 2013 - 05:44 PM

This is a tough one because I feel our needs go:

1. QB
then in a distant second place...

2. WR/OLB

Both are equivalent needs, it just depends on who is there in the 2nd, and how the trends during the draft go.

#4 910BillsFan

910BillsFan

    UDFA

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 65 posts

Posted 25 February 2013 - 05:54 PM

C

#5 BEAST MODE BABY!

BEAST MODE BABY!

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,538 posts

Posted 25 February 2013 - 06:02 PM

C, but you have C as OLB, WR then QB...so, you need to update that :)

#6 RyanC883

RyanC883

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,126 posts

Posted 25 February 2013 - 06:05 PM

If Dion Jordan or Olgetree is available, def. LB.  Otherwise, perhaps WR or DE.  At any rate, this draft should be interesting.  Even more so than most years, no one will have any idea what will happen until its happening.

#7 JPS

JPS

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,732 posts

Posted 25 February 2013 - 06:07 PM

I hate 'em all. The available players just don't fit. I hate Patterson idea. Geno Smith is just okay. Jones has spinal stenosis.  He got away with it in college, but he will be going up against bigger, faster dudes and I'd remove him from my draft board.

I'd go OL, QB, TE, but would be open to DL/LB in the 3rd.

#8 jboyst62

jboyst62

    Hall of Farmer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,020 posts

Posted 25 February 2013 - 06:09 PM

C.

I would be curious to see a OLB/WR/QB.  I think some top WR's could slip to the 2nd with a frenzy on some positions like QB coming in the first.

#9 Dibs

Dibs

    Myth Buster

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,005 posts

Posted 25 February 2013 - 06:14 PM

View PostAstrobot, on 25 February 2013 - 05:08 PM, said:

I suspect our positional needs (shown here for each team) have switched, so I am conducting a poll. This will affect future mock drafts on DraftTek.

Do you really base your positional needs on what all of us idiots think?

#10 jaybee

jaybee

    RFA

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 883 posts

Posted 25 February 2013 - 06:32 PM

View PostDibs, on 25 February 2013 - 06:14 PM, said:

Do you really base your positional needs on what all of us idiots think?

I sure hope not.  Instant credibility killer !!

#11 San Jose Bills Fan

San Jose Bills Fan

    San Jose Bills Fan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 20,764 posts

Posted 25 February 2013 - 08:44 PM

I understand the intent of the poll but ultimately it comes down to an individual player, not a position group AFAIC.

But I did vote for C.

#12 jboyst62

jboyst62

    Hall of Farmer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,020 posts

Posted 25 February 2013 - 09:26 PM

View PostDibs, on 25 February 2013 - 06:14 PM, said:



Do you really base your positional needs on what all of us idiots think?
Haha. You called yourself an idiot for being one of us!

#13 San Jose Bills Fan

San Jose Bills Fan

    San Jose Bills Fan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 20,764 posts

Posted 25 February 2013 - 09:38 PM

View Postjboyst62, on 25 February 2013 - 09:26 PM, said:

Haha. You called yourself an idiot for being one of us!

Yep.

The joke's on…who is the joke on?

#14 Green Lightning

Green Lightning

    Mr. Peanut

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,962 posts

Posted 25 February 2013 - 10:41 PM

Hummm,  option C I guess.  I want to like Barkley at #8 but just can't get there yet. Our LB's truly suck so let's start there.

#15 Dibs

Dibs

    Myth Buster

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,005 posts

Posted 26 February 2013 - 04:46 AM

View Postjboyst62, on 25 February 2013 - 09:26 PM, said:

Haha. You called yourself an idiot for being one of us!

Come to think of it.....my point would have been made clearer had I instead said....

"Do you really base your positional needs on what all of the idiots here think?"