What Positions Do We NOT Need To Draft??
#1
Posted 27 February 2013 - 01:58 PM
#2
Posted 27 February 2013 - 02:01 PM
#3
Posted 27 February 2013 - 02:04 PM
Edited by Johnny Hammersticks, 27 February 2013 - 02:04 PM.
#4
Posted 27 February 2013 - 02:07 PM
#5
Posted 27 February 2013 - 02:41 PM
#6
Posted 27 February 2013 - 02:54 PM
#7
Posted 27 February 2013 - 03:37 PM
missthe kgun, on 27 February 2013 - 02:07 PM, said:
I'll add LG, RG (assuming Levitre), LT, CB, KR, FB to your list.
Certainly I realize our record indicates we're bad everywhere, but I'm satisfied with the talent and skill we have at these positions.
IMO, we're really not that far away, player wise. Poor 4th quarter QBing and passive Defensive schemes doomed last season.
#8
Posted 27 February 2013 - 03:38 PM
#9
Posted 27 February 2013 - 03:44 PM
#10
Posted 27 February 2013 - 03:47 PM
#11
Posted 27 February 2013 - 03:48 PM
#12
Posted 27 February 2013 - 03:51 PM
heck, even a #3 RB could be on the table, since we have none and Freddy is aging. not early, but late.
we can literally draft for pretty much anywhere except maybe DE. orrr.. maybe even there if Mario plays OLB and we like a 3-4 end.
not exactly stacked anywhere. FA could change that but now? anything.
#14
Posted 27 February 2013 - 04:23 PM
Brainiac21, on 27 February 2013 - 03:51 PM, said:
heck, even a #3 RB could be on the table, since we have none and Freddy is aging. not early, but late.
we can literally draft for pretty much anywhere except maybe DE. orrr.. maybe even there if Mario plays OLB and we like a 3-4 end.
not exactly stacked anywhere. FA could change that but now? anything.
#15
Posted 27 February 2013 - 04:28 PM
#16
Posted 27 February 2013 - 04:31 PM
CBF
#18
Posted 27 February 2013 - 04:41 PM
distortions, on 27 February 2013 - 01:58 PM, said:
Give me a break, this team is not as hopeless as you make them out to be. Every team has needs. I think everyone on this board would think it a waste if they drafted any of the following positions in the first 3 rounds: O-Line (assuming they re-sign Levitre and frankly, even if they don't), RB (if you come back by discussing the Bills' 3rd string RB situation, then you don't know anything about football), Safety (they already stated they'd at least franchise Byrd) or D-Line. Not every team has polished quality starters at every position. The Bills desperately need linebackers, receivers and a quarterback. If they believe in Brooks and/or Searcy, I don't mind them signing a marginal veteran to compete with either of them and addressing other needs in the draft.
Edited by metzelaars_lives, 27 February 2013 - 04:42 PM.
#19
Posted 27 February 2013 - 04:46 PM
#20
Posted 27 February 2013 - 04:46 PM
Brainiac21, on 27 February 2013 - 03:51 PM, said:
heck, even a #3 RB could be on the table, since we have none and Freddy is aging. not early, but late.
we can literally draft for pretty much anywhere except maybe DE. orrr.. maybe even there if Mario plays OLB and we like a 3-4 end.
not exactly stacked anywhere. FA could change that but now? anything.
This board has such incredibly unrealistic expectations of what a good ofeensive line looks like. WE'VE HAD ONE FOR TWO YEARS NOW!!! At what cost do you draft a tackle? Instead of a linebacker??? Hairston is decent but enormous and still young, Pears is fine, Sanders even has potential and they just re-signed Colin Brown who actually has a pretty good pedigree. For a rookie, Cordy Glenn looked fantastic! Do you really think they're ever going to assemble a line of 5 pro bowlers? The line is fine. Honestly, I wouldn't even want them to draft a guard even if Levitre walks. Plug someone else in there. We need freaking playmakers man.











