???? - QB - SEC also ran
#1
Posted 03 March 2013 - 09:53 PM
I am no x's and o's expert but wouldn't a QB that faced better competition have a better chance of success? Everyone is always saying great stuff about the SEC so I am wondering what everyone thinks about the QBs from the doormats of the SEC.
The schools I'm thinking of are:
Vandy, Missouri, we've talked about the loser from Tennessee so he is out, Kentucky, Mississippi State, Mississippi, Ole Miss, Arkansas and Auburn. Are any of those guys worth anything?
Personally I'd rather look at them than some guy that played against nobodies. I guess you never know but it seems like they would be more ready when the real bullets fly. I'm interested to hear what you say.
#2
Posted 03 March 2013 - 10:05 PM
#3
Posted 03 March 2013 - 10:07 PM
4merper4mer, on 03 March 2013 - 09:53 PM, said:
I am no x's and o's expert but wouldn't a QB that faced better competition have a better chance of success? Everyone is always saying great stuff about the SEC so I am wondering what everyone thinks about the QBs from the doormats of the SEC.
The schools I'm thinking of are:
Vandy, Missouri, we've talked about the loser from Tennessee so he is out, Kentucky, Mississippi State, Mississippi, Ole Miss, Arkansas and Auburn. Are any of those guys worth anything?
Personally I'd rather look at them than some guy that played against nobodies. I guess you never know but it seems like they would be more ready when the real bullets fly. I'm interested to hear what you say.
R.P.I. isn't "some vocational school." It's a top-tier polytechnic university.
#4
Posted 03 March 2013 - 10:15 PM
ny33, on 03 March 2013 - 10:07 PM, said:
It is engineering which is a specific vocation. It wasn't meant to be a slam. Engineering is a great vocation. I'm just saying that playing QB there probably does not prepare someone for the NFL.
#5
Posted 03 March 2013 - 10:24 PM
4merper4mer, on 03 March 2013 - 09:53 PM, said:
I am no x's and o's expert but wouldn't a QB that faced better competition have a better chance of success? Everyone is always saying great stuff about the SEC so I am wondering what everyone thinks about the QBs from the doormats of the SEC.
The schools I'm thinking of are:
Vandy, Missouri, we've talked about the loser from Tennessee so he is out, Kentucky, Mississippi State, Mississippi, Ole Miss, Arkansas and Auburn. Are any of those guys worth anything?
Personally I'd rather look at them than some guy that played against nobodies. I guess you never know but it seems like they would be more ready when the real bullets fly. I'm interested to hear what you say.
#7
Posted 03 March 2013 - 10:35 PM
That is why game film, combine, pro days, etc.matter. you have to judge the QB, not the team they are on. It is a hugely different sport from Pro Football, a lot of people don't realize that.
#8
Posted 03 March 2013 - 11:10 PM
Lurker, on 03 March 2013 - 10:31 PM, said:
Then we should avoid QBs from big conferencess? Geez dude we should go with the law of averages. If you like a guy fine, but guys that play on crappy teams in good conferences do well all the time. Brady played for Michigan when they sucked. Eli played for Ole Miss or Mississippi I forget which, RG3 played for Baylor. I think it is a good formula. Sometimes guys that played for dominant teams like Sanchez, Leinart, Vince Young or Bradford look better than they really are. I would like an SEC QB but not Bray who is a jerk or the Alabama guy. I am just wondering which one would be a good fit.
I know there are also guys like Flacco and Ben the criminal but they are hard to find.
#9
Posted 03 March 2013 - 11:23 PM
#10
Posted 03 March 2013 - 11:41 PM
Johnny Hammersticks, on 03 March 2013 - 11:23 PM, said:
#11
Posted 04 March 2013 - 12:02 AM
Rg3, luck and Wilson all took poor teams from the prior year to the playoffs.
Tannehill and Weedon show promise, and cousins and Foles even looked ok in spot duty.
If this years group was in last years draft, I am not even sure how much would have been impacted.
#12
Posted 04 March 2013 - 12:07 AM
Not to mention he is one of the QB's coming out that are amongst the top 10 QB's this year b/c this years QB class SUCKS !
So if we are going to take a QB this year (which i almost wish we wouldn't) I would rather take the Loser from UT that has a big arm & some things about his game that can be fixed rather than take a complete unknown from the SEC that has no arm, no accuracy, bad decision making skills , & no athleticism so that the pick wouldn't be a complete lose .
#13
Posted 04 March 2013 - 12:14 AM
#14
Posted 04 March 2013 - 07:23 AM
over 20 years of fanhood, on 04 March 2013 - 12:02 AM, said:
Rg3, luck and Wilson all took poor teams from the prior year to the playoffs.
Tannehill and Weedon show promise, and cousins and Foles even looked ok in spot duty.
If this years group was in last years draft, I am not even sure how much would have been impacted.
Barkley was talked about going 3rd last year.
#15
Posted 04 March 2013 - 09:03 AM
#19
Posted 05 March 2013 - 12:16 AM











