How Bad Would It Be For The Bills To Sign Matt Moore,
#1
Posted 05 March 2013 - 07:26 PM
I am guessing that Moore could be had for approx. 3 years/18 million. In this scenario, they could acquire more picks, fill holes, and go after a qb next year.
I suppose the question is whether or not Bills management thinks that he is better than Fitz. I lean towards thinking that he is.
Opinions?
#2
Posted 05 March 2013 - 07:28 PM
#3
Posted 05 March 2013 - 07:34 PM
I *might* consider Matt Barkley at #8 in round one, but I see that as a gamble. I am not at all sold on Geno Smith. I suspect that one of the following will be available when the Bills pick in round 2: Ryan Nassib, EJ Manuel, Tyler Wilson. IMHO, each is worthy of consideration there. I am not sure if I'd prefer Matt Moore to one of those, but I suppose that they could sign Moore and still pick one of those 3.
Regarding a trade down, it usually is worth considering. However, if they have convinced themselves that they don't need to "reach" for a QB in round 1, they should be able to get a very good player at another position with the 8th pick.
#4
Posted 05 March 2013 - 07:37 PM
Bill from NYC, on 05 March 2013 - 07:26 PM, said:
I am guessing that Moore could be had for approx. 3 years/18 million. In this scenario, they could acquire more picks, fill holes, and go after a qb next year.
I suppose the question is whether or not Bills management thinks that he is better than Fitz. I lean towards thinking that he is.
Opinions?
#5
Posted 05 March 2013 - 07:39 PM
OldTimer1960, on 05 March 2013 - 07:34 PM, said:
I *might* consider Matt Barkley at #8 in round one, but I see that as a gamble. I am not at all sold on Geno Smith. I suspect that one of the following will be available when the Bills pick in round 2: Ryan Nassib, EJ Manuel, Tyler Wilson. IMHO, each is worthy of consideration there. I am not sure if I'd prefer Matt Moore to one of those, but I suppose that they could sign Moore and still pick one of those 3.
Regarding a trade down, it usually is worth considering. However, if they have convinced themselves that they don't need to "reach" for a QB in round 1, they should be able to get a very good player at another position with the 8th pick.
I like Tyler Bray more than the kids that you mentioned. And he probably won't be ready to step in as a rookie.
Either way, I am just floating ideas around.
#6
Posted 05 March 2013 - 07:43 PM
#7
Posted 05 March 2013 - 07:46 PM
#9
Posted 05 March 2013 - 07:49 PM
Edited by Section242, 05 March 2013 - 07:50 PM.
#12
Posted 05 March 2013 - 07:54 PM
#15
Posted 05 March 2013 - 07:57 PM
Bill from NYC, on 05 March 2013 - 07:26 PM, said:
I am guessing that Moore could be had for approx. 3 years/18 million. In this scenario, they could acquire more picks, fill holes, and go after a qb next year.
I suppose the question is whether or not Bills management thinks that he is better than Fitz. I lean towards thinking that he is.
Opinions?
He is...
#18
Posted 05 March 2013 - 08:06 PM
Bill from NYC, on 05 March 2013 - 07:26 PM, said:
I am guessing that Moore could be had for approx. 3 years/18 million. In this scenario, they could acquire more picks, fill holes, and go after a qb next year.
I suppose the question is whether or not Bills management thinks that he is better than Fitz. I lean towards thinking that he is.
Opinions?
Pick the QB:
Completion YPA TD% INT% FUM% QBR
59% 6.95 4.4% 3.4% 2% 80.5
60% 6.37 4.1% 3.6% 1% 76.8
One of these is Fitz. One of these is Moore. Is one is a significant upgrade over the other, worth investing another $18 million?
For Moore's 2011 season starting 12 games for the Dolphins, his completion percentage ranged from 47% to 74%. YPG from 95 to 281. YPA from 4.2 to 10.8.
More consistent than Fitz?
NoSaint, on 05 March 2013 - 08:02 PM, said:
Also a quarter of the price, or less
Just a note that the OP suggested 3 years/$18 million as Moore's price.
PS I'd be kind of surprised if a team offers Moore that much money, myself.
Edited by Hopeful, 05 March 2013 - 08:13 PM.











