Welker to test Free Agency (Update - now a Bronco)
#1
Posted 06 March 2013 - 11:15 AM
New England Patriots wide receiver Wes Welker has no plans to re-sign with the team before first testing the free-agent market next week, a league source told ESPN NFL Insider Adam Schefter.
Well at the very least we might not have to see him 2 times a year anymore.. not sure I'd want to pay him to be on the Bills, but either way this is a good thing.
#2
Posted 06 March 2013 - 11:18 AM
#3
Posted 06 March 2013 - 11:19 AM
#4
Posted 06 March 2013 - 11:21 AM
And word is that the Pats might also cut Brandon Lloyd, who was a disappointment for them last year, and who is scheduled to receive a $3M option bonus on 3/16.
#5
Posted 06 March 2013 - 11:23 AM
#6
Posted 06 March 2013 - 11:24 AM
bills1960, on 06 March 2013 - 11:23 AM, said:
#7
Posted 06 March 2013 - 11:25 AM
#8
Posted 06 March 2013 - 11:47 AM
RuntheDamnBall, on 06 March 2013 - 11:18 AM, said:
They'll just find someone else who can get open in short spaces to take beautifully delivered passes from Brady. Still, it would be nice to have him out of the division.
GO BILLS!!!
#9
Posted 06 March 2013 - 12:02 PM
#10
Posted 06 March 2013 - 12:31 PM
#11
Posted 06 March 2013 - 12:35 PM
PTR
#12
Posted 06 March 2013 - 12:44 PM
PromoTheRobot, on 06 March 2013 - 12:35 PM, said:
PTR
The article does not say that the Pats are considering Nelson.
While it's possible or even probable the writer is simply connecting dots.
He has no inside information indicating interest.
#14
Posted 06 March 2013 - 01:09 PM
It is worth the money to take him out of that offense. Danny Woodhead is not Wes Welker, that offense performs on a different level when Welker is in there.
Edited by Why So Serious?, 06 March 2013 - 01:10 PM.
#15
Posted 06 March 2013 - 01:14 PM
Billsrhody, on 06 March 2013 - 11:15 AM, said:
New England Patriots wide receiver Wes Welker has no plans to re-sign with the team before first testing the free-agent market next week, a league source told ESPN NFL Insider Adam Schefter.
Well at the very least we might not have to see him 2 times a year anymore.. not sure I'd want to pay him to be on the Bills, but either way this is a good thing.
#16
Posted 06 March 2013 - 01:23 PM
#17
Posted 06 March 2013 - 01:23 PM
Why So Serious?, on 06 March 2013 - 01:09 PM, said:
Maybe but no NFL team will use that as the sole reason to sign him. They would sign him if he fits their plans.
Anything else would be a bonus.
#18
Posted 06 March 2013 - 01:37 PM
RyanC883, on 06 March 2013 - 01:23 PM, said:
The Steelers don't overpay for their own aging vets, let alone someone else's. It's not their style. They have some good young receivers in Brown & Sanders and would go younger and cheaper than Welker for Wallace's replacement, IMO. In the end, I could see Welker re-signing with NE* when seeing that the money won't be much less than what he's offered elsewhere.
#19
Posted 06 March 2013 - 01:43 PM
ExWNYer, on 06 March 2013 - 01:37 PM, said:
The Steelers don't overpay for their own aging vets, let alone someone else's. It's not their style. They have some good young receivers in Brown & Sanders and would go younger and cheaper than Welker for Wallace's replacement, IMO. In the end, I could see Welker re-signing with NE* when seeing that the money won't be much less than what he's offered elsewhere.
I also think this is most likely.
Being on the free market gives both Welker and the team the peace of mind that the eventual contract is fair to both sides.
I see the same thing with Dashon Goldson in San Francisco.
#20
Posted 06 March 2013 - 01:56 PM
San Jose Bills Fan, on 06 March 2013 - 01:23 PM, said:
Anything else would be a bonus.
He is not as old as people say he is. He is basically exactly the same size as Steve Largent and Steve Largent played until he was 35. Steve Largent played in an era where Steve AtWater and Ronnie Lott could explode a WR in front of your eyes and it would be completely legal. Not to mention the improvements in health and fitness.
I fully anticipate atleast 3 more productive years from Welker without a problem.











