McKelvin re-signed
#1
Posted 09 March 2013 - 11:37 AM
#2
Posted 09 March 2013 - 11:39 AM
#3
Posted 09 March 2013 - 11:40 AM
#4
Posted 09 March 2013 - 11:42 AM
#5
Posted 09 March 2013 - 11:45 AM
#6
Posted 09 March 2013 - 11:46 AM
BRAWNDO, on 09 March 2013 - 11:40 AM, said:
He was the only spark on this team during several games in the last 3 or 4 years. His ability to dynamically change the game was riveting. For better or for worse, the guy made you pay attention.
#7
Posted 09 March 2013 - 11:49 AM
#8
Posted 09 March 2013 - 11:50 AM
jboyst62, on 09 March 2013 - 11:46 AM, said:
He was the only spark on this team during several games in the last 3 or 4 years. His ability to dynamically change the game was riveting. For better or for worse, the guy made you pay attention.
Glad he is back, 5 million per year probably limits too many more FA signings this offseason, unless Fitz re does his contract.
#9
Posted 09 March 2013 - 11:50 AM
#10
Posted 09 March 2013 - 11:51 AM
Edited by Magox, 09 March 2013 - 11:51 AM.
#11
Posted 09 March 2013 - 11:52 AM
TheZone78, on 09 March 2013 - 11:42 AM, said:
$5 Million per year sounds too high for what I've seen from Mckelvin so far. But, I'm replying to "TheZone78" because he's exactly right, a tweet of $20M over 4 years doesn't tell us enough... and may not be accurate at all.
Everyone seems to agree McKelvin has the "tools"; now I'm intersted to see if he can master the mental part of the game, including looking for the ball at the right times.
I'd be fine with him getting $3M first year, then $3.5M, $4.5M, $6.5M with a $2M signing bonus, and some of that salary tied to playing time.
#12
Posted 09 March 2013 - 11:52 AM
#13
Posted 09 March 2013 - 11:52 AM
#14
Posted 09 March 2013 - 11:53 AM
#15
Posted 09 March 2013 - 11:53 AM
buffalobillsgrl, on 09 March 2013 - 11:50 AM, said:
Nickel backers in today's passing league play well over half of all the defensive plays.
#16
Posted 09 March 2013 - 11:55 AM
Nix said as much in the interview he gave at the combine that he viewed McKelvin as the other starting corner opposite Gilmore when asked...guess it was foreshadowing...
#17
Posted 09 March 2013 - 11:57 AM
#18
Posted 09 March 2013 - 11:58 AM
Magox, on 09 March 2013 - 11:53 AM, said:
#19
Posted 09 March 2013 - 11:59 AM
jahnyc, on 09 March 2013 - 11:53 AM, said:
Absolutely correct.
#20
Posted 09 March 2013 - 12:00 PM











