Bills, Fitzpatrick inch toward $3 million decision
#1
Posted 11 March 2013 - 06:49 AM
Either way, the Bills would save $7.45 million in cash by moving on. http://profootballta...llion-decision/
#2
Posted 11 March 2013 - 06:59 AM
#3
Posted 11 March 2013 - 07:16 AM
#4
Posted 11 March 2013 - 07:22 AM
#6
#8
Posted 11 March 2013 - 07:41 AM
Jeez, the top rated QB's do it, why can't Fitz ?
.
#9
Posted 11 March 2013 - 07:42 AM
#10
Posted 11 March 2013 - 07:51 AM
papazoid, on 11 March 2013 - 06:49 AM, said:
Either way, the Bills would save $7.45 million in cash by moving on. http://profootballta...llion-decision/
Fitz will be on this team this season and starting week 1.
Edited by bobobonators, 11 March 2013 - 07:52 AM.
#12
Posted 11 March 2013 - 07:58 AM
#13
Posted 11 March 2013 - 08:07 AM
#14
Posted 11 March 2013 - 08:27 AM
#15
Posted 11 March 2013 - 09:46 AM
I'm really on the fence; as much as I know Fitz isn't the answer as a starter, he might be a very good insurance policy if Buffalo drafts a QB and plans to start him. He's also a heluva teammate and not the kind of guy to "Flutie" his successor in the locker room.
#16
Posted 11 March 2013 - 10:51 AM
Fitz may not win you many games, but neither will the Bills defense. Fitz was behind an offense last year that put up 21 points pe game without a #1 receiver (no Stevie is not a #1), four of 5 starting offensive lineman and their top 2 reserve OL missing significant time. Mean while, the defense gave up 27 points per game. The only NFL offenses that could have withstood that and won with that defense are the Pats, Broncos, and Saints.
If the Bills defense decides it's time to remove the skirts and don some man pants and a few holes filled, the Bills are easily capable of winning 10 games with Fitz. Whether that's good enough to snatch a playoff spot, that will be determined.
Fitz is staying. The Bills don't have a better option right now and it is they that backed themselves into this corner by signing him way too soon. Releasing Fitz right now would be like playing a game of poker and showing all of your opponents the cards you are holdng in your hand. Teams can and will jump in front of the Bills in rounds 1-3 of the draft if they want a QB. And bringing in any of the FA QBs out there to learn an offense for one yearis just stupid. THrowig good money after bad money.
#18
Posted 11 March 2013 - 10:54 AM
eball, on 11 March 2013 - 09:46 AM, said:
I'm really on the fence; as much as I know Fitz isn't the answer as a starter, he might be a very good insurance policy if Buffalo drafts a QB and plans to start him. He's also a heluva teammate and not the kind of guy to "Flutie" his successor in the locker room.
I agree about Fitz's character...But I'm not even sure it's really about Fitz as much as it's about the influence he has with some players still on the roster...And I think it's even more about where this team will be this time next year...Fitz may be the consummate team-first guy...But what about the rest of that locker room (Stevie?) when the Rookie, or TJax, have a couple bad games in a row? That's why I think it's best to just move on...
Honestly...I realize no NFL Team is going to look at it this way publicly...But anything they get in the win column in 2013 is bonus...The Bills need to have laser focus on the long-term future at QB...And that's definitely not Fitz...So...Why not just get it over with?
#19
Posted 11 March 2013 - 10:59 AM
#20
Posted 11 March 2013 - 11:04 AM
Kelly the Dog, on 11 March 2013 - 10:59 AM, said:
I don't disagree...In fact I think it's likely you're 100% right...But that is definitely filed under my personal "worst-case-scenario." When Fitz gets benched it's sure as heck going to look like we should have just cut our ties and moved on...But we'll see I guess...


This topic is locked








