#1
Posted 16 March 2013 - 09:15 AM
1. Bethlehem Steel Site in Lackawanna
2. Outer Harbor
3. Downtown Buffalo
4. Niagara Falls.
Really not new information but I thought it was interesting that the committee tasked with finding a new site has already started meeting.
http://www.wgrz.com/...nder-Discussion
#2
Posted 16 March 2013 - 09:38 AM
#3
Posted 16 March 2013 - 09:41 AM
#4
Posted 16 March 2013 - 09:48 AM
#5
Posted 16 March 2013 - 09:51 AM
#6
Posted 16 March 2013 - 09:52 AM
Edited by RyanC883, 16 March 2013 - 09:53 AM.
#7
Posted 16 March 2013 - 09:55 AM
#8
Posted 16 March 2013 - 10:13 AM
#9
Posted 16 March 2013 - 10:43 AM
#10
Posted 16 March 2013 - 11:14 AM
ChevyVanMiller, on 16 March 2013 - 10:13 AM, said:
Problem is the noise in Niagara Falls has caused lack of hearing in residents forcing them to shout all the time; this also will make it hard to hear the snap count when offense is on field.
#12
Posted 16 March 2013 - 11:27 AM
It seems like a waste to put a football stadium on the waterfront.
I vote downtown Buffalo
#13
Posted 16 March 2013 - 12:02 PM
FYI the GI bridges are not the only way into NF. There's River Road/LaSalle Expy, NF Blvd and Rt 104 from the East
PTR
#14
Posted 16 March 2013 - 12:11 PM
TheFunPolice, on 16 March 2013 - 11:27 AM, said:
It seems like a waste to put a football stadium on the waterfront.
I vote downtown Buffalo
Just do what they did here in Syracuse, skim the top layer of dirt, pile it in the corner of a parking lot and cover it. Then claim hundreds of millions in goverment money for your "enviromental cleanup costs" that only ran a few million.
#15
Posted 16 March 2013 - 02:31 PM
Best Player Available, on 16 March 2013 - 10:43 AM, said:
The problem with both the Bethlehem and Outer Harbor would be traffic flow with Route 5 being the only major access road for both sites
Edited by BRAWNDO, 16 March 2013 - 02:32 PM.
#16
Posted 16 March 2013 - 02:41 PM
BRAWNDO, on 16 March 2013 - 02:31 PM, said:
That's true.
Plus why waste prime waterfront property, that everyone should have access to, on a little used stadium. Of course we have no other plans going unfortunately.
Downtown? What property? Don't under estimate how much land you need and how little is available. Maybe the old Republic site.
Some how I don't understand pouring $$$ into the Ralph to then start a new stadium right after that if not before the current lease expires. Put the new stadium next to the old
Edited by MarkyMannn, 16 March 2013 - 02:43 PM.
#17
Posted 16 March 2013 - 02:45 PM
#18
Posted 16 March 2013 - 02:49 PM
BillsWatch, on 16 March 2013 - 11:14 AM, said:
Good point.
Can you imagine trying to sing the Shout song after every scoring play?
It would be pointless.
#19
Posted 16 March 2013 - 02:55 PM
BillsWatch, on 16 March 2013 - 11:14 AM, said:
Large font ≠ Caps. Anyway, sorry I was on my work computer and didn't realize the font was so large.
#20
Posted 16 March 2013 - 02:58 PM
Best Player Available, on 16 March 2013 - 10:43 AM, said:
Useless and irrelevant for years, just like the team...
The team's play has already turned the majority of its fan base toxic...
This would be in keeping with the team's need for a massive roster rebuild...
Ralph is cheap...
An added bonus is that the team would, literally, play to "glowing" reviews...











