Jump to content


Fred Davis is kicking himself post draft


  • Please log in to reply
66 replies to this topic

#1 Floridabillsfan1

Floridabillsfan1

    Practice Squad

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 120 posts

Posted 03 May 2013 - 09:15 AM

Ok , maybe just a little . Lol .  But I think he would of signed here if he had just waited and saw what the Bills were doing on offense .  He would of got a much needed fresh start and would have been a major weapon in this fast ( projection ) offense .   The Bills locker room is probably better off since these rookies would have been looking up to him as a veteran .    Would do you guys think ?

#2 FleaMoulds80

FleaMoulds80

    RFA

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 696 posts

Posted 03 May 2013 - 09:19 AM

He has RG3 throwing him the ball and will most likely play in the playoffs next year. Why would he have any regrets with going back to the Skins? Buffalo will probably miss out on the playoffs again this year and still have a big question mark at the QB position.

#3 nucci

nucci

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,118 posts

Posted 03 May 2013 - 09:22 AM

View PostFloridabillsfan1, on 03 May 2013 - 09:15 AM, said:

Ok , maybe just a little . Lol .  But I think he would of signed here if he had just waited and saw what the Bills were doing on offense .  He would of got a much needed fresh start and would have been a major weapon in this fast ( projection ) offense .   The Bills locker room is probably better off since these rookies would have been looking up to him as a veteran . Would do you guys think ?
Have

#4 KD in CT

KD in CT

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 28,357 posts

Posted 03 May 2013 - 09:28 AM

Gotta love the annual post-draft Kool-Aid fest, where suddenly everyone is dying to leave their playoff team and come to Buffalo.

#5 Triple Threat

Triple Threat

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,129 posts

Posted 03 May 2013 - 09:28 AM

Great quote from Davis.  I can see where you got the notion he's kicking himself.

#6 jumbalaya

jumbalaya

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,561 posts

Posted 03 May 2013 - 09:56 AM

View PostFloridabillsfan1, on 03 May 2013 - 09:15 AM, said:

Ok , maybe just a little . Lol .  But I think he would of signed here if he had just waited and saw what the Bills were doing on offense .  He would of got a much needed fresh start and would have been a major weapon in this fast ( projection ) offense .   The Bills locker room is probably better off since these rookies would have been looking up to him as a veteran . Would do you guys think ?
Really, you don't think he came here just to up his price with Washington?  He played us, dude.

#7 26CornerBlitz

26CornerBlitz

    10/8/14 - Welcome to Pegulaville

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,022 posts

Posted 03 May 2013 - 09:57 AM

View PostFloridabillsfan1, on 03 May 2013 - 09:15 AM, said:

Ok , maybe just a little . Lol .  But I think he would of signed here if he had just waited and saw what the Bills were doing on offense .  He would of got a much needed fresh start and would have been a major weapon in this fast ( projection ) offense .   The Bills locker room is probably better off since these rookies would have been looking up to him as a veteran . Would do you guys think ?

Doubt it, he's on a team with RGIII.

#8 billsrcursed

billsrcursed

    RFA

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,254 posts

Posted 03 May 2013 - 10:05 AM

Thread title is misleading.

#9 metzelaars_lives

metzelaars_lives

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,727 posts

Posted 03 May 2013 - 10:19 AM

View Postnucci, on 03 May 2013 - 09:22 AM, said:

Have

Thank you.  The not knowing "they're" vs. "there" (and "their") and having no clue when to use "your" vs. "you're" is to be expected, but it blows my mind how many times people write "could of" or "would of" on this site.  I would venture to guess that posters on here write "of" instead of "have" more than 50% of the time.  Oh well.

Edited by metzelaars_lives, 03 May 2013 - 10:19 AM.


#10 Kelly the Dog

Kelly the Dog

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 27,301 posts

Posted 03 May 2013 - 10:20 AM

View Postjumbalaya, on 03 May 2013 - 09:56 AM, said:

Really, you don't think he came here just to up his price with Washington?  He played us, dude.
Those two things are not mutually exclusive.

#11 McD

McD

    RFA

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,324 posts

Posted 03 May 2013 - 10:37 AM

Lets see how long RGIII's knee holds up....

#12 eball

eball

    Omar Sly

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,781 posts

Posted 03 May 2013 - 10:46 AM

View Postmetzelaars_lives, on 03 May 2013 - 10:19 AM, said:

Thank you.  The not knowing "they're" vs. "there" (and "their") and having no clue when to use "your" vs. "you're" is to be expected, but it blows my mind how many times people write "could of" or "would of" on this site.  I would venture to guess that posters on here write "of" instead of "have" more than 50% of the time.  Oh well.

Yes, it's surprising, since supposably we have good schools.

#13 26CornerBlitz

26CornerBlitz

    10/8/14 - Welcome to Pegulaville

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,022 posts

Posted 03 May 2013 - 10:56 AM

View Postmetzelaars_lives, on 03 May 2013 - 10:19 AM, said:

Thank you.  The not knowing "they're" vs. "there" (and "their") and having no clue when to use "your" vs. "you're" is to be expected, but it blows my mind how many times people write "could of" or "would of" on this site.  I would venture to guess that posters on here write "of" instead of "have" more than 50% of the time.  Oh well.

Here Here or is it Hear Hear :lol:  All two, to, or too common these days. :lol:  They're interchangeable right? or is that write?

#14 KD in CT

KD in CT

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 28,357 posts

Posted 03 May 2013 - 11:33 AM

View Postmetzelaars_lives, on 03 May 2013 - 10:19 AM, said:

Thank you.  The not knowing "they're" vs. "there" (and "their") and having no clue when to use "your" vs. "you're" is to be expected, but it blows my mind how many times people write "could of" or "would of" on this site.  I would venture to guess that posters on here write "of" instead of "have" more than 50% of the time.  Oh well.
But those pale in comparison to the people who refer to Buffalo's football team as the "Bill's".

#15 Cash

Cash

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,802 posts

Posted 03 May 2013 - 11:45 AM

View PostKD in CT, on 03 May 2013 - 11:33 AM, said:

But those pale in comparison to the people who refer to Buffalo's football team as the "Bill's".

I thought the idea was that "Buffalo Bill's Football Team" meant that the team belonged to Buffalo Bill?  If not, then who the hell is that old geezer in the owner's box?

#16 yungmack

yungmack

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,709 posts

Posted 03 May 2013 - 11:45 AM

View Postmetzelaars_lives, on 03 May 2013 - 10:19 AM, said:

Thank you.  The not knowing "they're" vs. "there" (and "their") and having no clue when to use "your" vs. "you're" is to be expected, but it blows my mind how many times people write "could of" or "would of" on this site.  I would venture to guess that posters on here write "of" instead of "have" more than 50% of the time.  Oh well.
The one on TSW that jumps out at me is "reigns" instead of "reins" when writing something like "The Bills are handing the reigns to EJ." As he was drafted to be a QB and not a king, it would be nice to see "reins" used.

#17 metzelaars_lives

metzelaars_lives

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,727 posts

Posted 03 May 2013 - 11:49 AM

View PostKD in CT, on 03 May 2013 - 11:33 AM, said:

But those pale in comparison to the people who refer to Buffalo's football team as the "Bill's".

Yeah that's a good one too.  I hate to pile on here, but these are simple rules of the English language that I literally had a firm grasp of when I was in 3rd grade.  It's insane that grown men don't know that an apostrophe denotes either possession or a contraction.

Edited by metzelaars_lives, 03 May 2013 - 11:49 AM.


#18 Chandler#81

Chandler#81

    Veteran

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,277 posts

Posted 03 May 2013 - 11:52 AM

View Postyungmack, on 03 May 2013 - 11:45 AM, said:


The one on TSW that jumps out at me is "reigns" instead of "reins" when writing something like "The Bills are handing the reigns to EJ." As he was drafted to be a QB and not a king, it would be nice to see "reins" used.

OK, rain it in fellaz. Their two uset to ofing they're weigh around hear..

#19 John from Hemet

John from Hemet

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,324 posts

Posted 03 May 2013 - 11:56 AM

View PostFleaMoulds80, on 03 May 2013 - 09:19 AM, said:

He has RG3 throwing him the ball and will most likely play in the playoffs next year. Why would he have any regrets with going back to the Skins? Buffalo will probably miss out on the playoffs again this year and still have a big question mark at the QB position.

Troll

What will be interesting to see if if Fred Davis actually comes back 100 percent......or whether he is diminished.

The bills might be thankful he didnt sign

#20 26CornerBlitz

26CornerBlitz

    10/8/14 - Welcome to Pegulaville

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,022 posts

Posted 03 May 2013 - 11:58 AM

View PostChandler#81, on 03 May 2013 - 11:52 AM, said:

OK, rain it in fellaz. Their two uset to ofing they're weigh around hear..

You think your better then us? :lol: