Rams get told NO
Posted 05 July 2013 - 02:54 PM
...Meanwhile the Jags are going to show the redzone at games to try and uncover the tarps before they move to London lol.
...I guess this should put the Bills out in relocation talks with their new lease at least for a few years. Maybe the Dolphins looking for a government hand out will move to Havana....
Posted 05 July 2013 - 03:16 PM
in the parking lot or the football field?
Posted 05 July 2013 - 04:01 PM
Posted 05 July 2013 - 04:22 PM
Posted 05 July 2013 - 04:59 PM
Posted 05 July 2013 - 06:16 PM
Posted 05 July 2013 - 06:29 PM
Posted 05 July 2013 - 07:17 PM
Posted 05 July 2013 - 07:40 PM
Exactly. If this keeps happening, it will eventually set a precedent that all nfl stadiums get only private funding, or paid by league, owners, whatever. Something like this should not be left to taxpayers.
Posted 05 July 2013 - 07:47 PM
Posted 05 July 2013 - 10:42 PM
Posted 05 July 2013 - 11:02 PM
The problem is that if the Rams move to LA, then St. Louis is at the top of the list of cities to get a team. Bottom line, yes I would be happy if the Jaguars, Raiders, Chargers or Rams move to LA but all that really does is buy us a little bit extra time. It would not change the fact that they need a new stadium at some point.
And also you meant "prospective." But that's OK.
Edited by metzelaars_lives, 05 July 2013 - 11:03 PM.
Posted 06 July 2013 - 12:08 AM
Posted 06 July 2013 - 06:49 AM
Posted 06 July 2013 - 06:58 AM
Edited by simpleman, 06 July 2013 - 07:03 AM.
Posted 06 July 2013 - 07:16 AM
The players certainly do contribute to costs. Concussions, ravaged joints, splintered bones, etc. resulting in endless pain for the rest of their lives. Without their willingness to endure that, there would be no football product to sell.
Posted 06 July 2013 - 07:19 AM
Now all we need is an electorate that holds its elected officials responsible for their current irresponsibility and malfeasance.
Posted 06 July 2013 - 08:22 AM