Jump to content


Jets- extra preparation for our game


  • Please log in to reply
28 replies to this topic

#1 SF Bills Fan

SF Bills Fan

    Can I Play With Madness

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,253 posts

Posted 13 September 2013 - 10:45 AM

This is one of handful of weeks where we face an opponent that has extra time to prepare. I hate to think that the Jet staff is already starting to game plan.

#2 matter2003

matter2003

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,332 posts

Posted 13 September 2013 - 10:48 AM

Only positive is the CBA limits amount of practices

#3 PromoTheRobot

PromoTheRobot

    "...I hope I'm wrong..."

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 23,490 posts

Posted 13 September 2013 - 10:53 AM

The NFL must hate the Pats then.  They only had 4 days to prepare.

#4 SF Bills Fan

SF Bills Fan

    Can I Play With Madness

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,253 posts

Posted 13 September 2013 - 11:46 AM

Good point- but so did the Jets

#5 Realist

Realist

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,487 posts

Posted 13 September 2013 - 12:09 PM

Its true they have more time, but they still only have one game to really look at and game plan from.  They can't really do too much more until they get the film against Carolina.  Its not like they can grab all of last season's films and look at those too.  I don't think the extra time is an excuse this week.

#6 zow2

zow2

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,363 posts

Posted 13 September 2013 - 12:16 PM

They get to watch our game Sunday, the Bills staff got to watch their game Thursday night.  I don't think this is a big deal.  Sometimes the extra days work against a club, vs. having the normal Sunday to Sunday routine.

#7 NoSaint

NoSaint

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 20,818 posts

Posted 13 September 2013 - 12:24 PM

Id say they know our DC pretty well already (and he well versed on both sides for them), rest shouldn't be huge this early (in fact still not being in routines might hurt them)... If we lose its not the gap between Thursday and Sunday.

#8 RyanC883

RyanC883

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,122 posts

Posted 13 September 2013 - 12:35 PM

not like Geno will be watching the game or any tape of it anyway.

View Postzow2, on 13 September 2013 - 12:16 PM, said:

They get to watch our game Sunday, the Bills staff got to watch their game Thursday night.  I don't think this is a big deal.  Sometimes the extra days work against a club, vs. having the normal Sunday to Sunday routine.

I agree.   We don't have a "short" week, so I don't think the extra time benefits them.  If anything, they are more banged up playing Sunday then Thursday.

#9 Dragonborn10

Dragonborn10

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,414 posts

Posted 13 September 2013 - 01:03 PM

Well let's see they can look at their own playbook to see what we do on defense already - no need for a few more days.
They will have to wait until Sunday to get another look at EJ and our offense.
Their DT got hurt playing on a short week - he looked quite gimpy coming off the field but don't know extent of injury.
Their QB got exposed.
Some low-level assistant is already breaking down last nights film.
Marrone has already coached against Geno.
Pettine knows their system and players.

Of any week where there may be an advantage this is not the one...

#10 microscopes

microscopes

    RFA

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 751 posts

Posted 13 September 2013 - 01:19 PM

I will be thoroughly disappointed if we don't spank the Jets.

That is one bad football team.

#11 BillsFan-4-Ever

BillsFan-4-Ever

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,249 posts

Posted 13 September 2013 - 01:37 PM

hubris ......  
I aint worried -  Its the freaking NYETS were talking about!!!

#12 WIDE LEFT

WIDE LEFT

    Probation

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 48 posts

Posted 13 September 2013 - 01:50 PM

View Postmicroscopes, on 13 September 2013 - 01:19 PM, said:

I will be thoroughly disappointed if we don't spank the Jets.

That is one bad football team.

You mean like the Patriots spanked them. It is not a bad football team. The Jets have a great defense, which makes any team very competitive.

#13 microscopes

microscopes

    RFA

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 751 posts

Posted 13 September 2013 - 01:50 PM

View PostWIDE LEFT, on 13 September 2013 - 01:50 PM, said:

You mean like the Patriots spanked them. It is not a bad football team. The Jets have a great defense, which makes any team very competitive.

No they don't.

And the Patriots didn't spank them because the Patriots played like dog crap.

#14 WIDE LEFT

WIDE LEFT

    Probation

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 48 posts

Posted 13 September 2013 - 02:11 PM

View Postmicroscopes, on 13 September 2013 - 01:50 PM, said:



No they don't.

And the Patriots didn't spank them because the Patriots played like dog crap.
So the Jets defense had absolutely nothing to do with; the Pats just played like dog crap for their home opener on Thursday night football. . Sure.  And Tampa played like crap the week before and couldn't do jack against Jet defense. The Jets defense which was the 5th rated defense in the NFL last year.  I guess most of the offenses they faced last year just played like dog crap. Just all one big coincidence.

#15 microscopes

microscopes

    RFA

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 751 posts

Posted 13 September 2013 - 03:31 PM

View PostWIDE LEFT, on 13 September 2013 - 02:11 PM, said:


So the Jets defense had absolutely nothing to do with; the Pats just played like dog crap for their home opener on Thursday night football. . Sure.  And Tampa played like crap the week before and couldn't do jack against Jet defense. The Jets defense which was the 5th rated defense in the NFL last year.  I guess most of the offenses they faced last year just played like dog crap. Just all one big coincidence.

1) you do realize the Jets were 6-10 last year, right? That's a bad team.

2) they then lost this offseason their Starting CB, Starting DB, 2 Starting LB's.

So the Jets sucked last season AND lost 4 starting defensive players AND only best Tampa because of a late hit out of bounds.

Yeah, they're great...

#16 thebandit27

thebandit27

    Armchair Dynasty Architect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,213 posts

Posted 13 September 2013 - 03:35 PM

View Postmicroscopes, on 13 September 2013 - 03:31 PM, said:

1) you do realize the Jets were 6-10 last year, right? That's a bad team.

2) they then lost this offseason their Starting CB, Starting DB, 2 Starting LB's.

So the Jets sucked last season AND lost 4 starting defensive players AND only best Tampa because of a late hit out of bounds.

Yeah, they're great...

I'm pretty sure you're just going by the box score.

#17 Kirby Jackson

Kirby Jackson

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,752 posts

Posted 13 September 2013 - 03:56 PM

As long as they have those skill players they can prepare as long as they need.

#18 NoSaint

NoSaint

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 20,818 posts

Posted 13 September 2013 - 04:00 PM

View PostWIDE LEFT, on 13 September 2013 - 02:11 PM, said:


So the Jets defense had absolutely nothing to do with; the Pats just played like dog crap for their home opener on Thursday night football. . Sure.  And Tampa played like crap the week before and couldn't do jack against Jet defense. The Jets defense which was the 5th rated defense in the NFL last year.  I guess most of the offenses they faced last year just played like dog crap. Just all one big coincidence.

im not going to argue that the jets have a bad defense but the pats let a lot of opportunities get away lastnight.

#19 microscopes

microscopes

    RFA

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 751 posts

Posted 13 September 2013 - 04:42 PM

View Postthebandit27, on 13 September 2013 - 03:35 PM, said:



I'm pretty sure you're just going by the box score.

Haha. Well played.

#20 San Jose Bills Fan

San Jose Bills Fan

    San Jose Bills Fan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 20,764 posts

Posted 13 September 2013 - 07:00 PM

View PostPromoTheRobot, on 13 September 2013 - 10:53 AM, said:

The NFL must hate the Pats then.  They only had 4 days to prepare.

So did their opponent.

We're talking about the inequity in prep time between teams who face each other.

View Postmicroscopes, on 13 September 2013 - 01:19 PM, said:

I will be thoroughly disappointed if we don't spank the Jets.

That is one bad football team.

Bad? I'd say they have a bad offense and a good defense.

Most importantly they have a QB situation which will make winning difficult but their D will be a good test for the Bills.

View Postmicroscopes, on 13 September 2013 - 03:31 PM, said:

1) you do realize the Jets were 6-10 last year, right? That's a bad team.

2) they then lost this offseason their Starting CB, Starting DB, 2 Starting LB's.

So the Jets sucked last season AND lost 4 starting defensive players AND only best Tampa because of a late hit out of bounds.

Yeah, they're great...

The losses of Revis and Landry were substantial.

However the loss of 2 starting LBs is inconsequential at best. When the Jets let them walk there was zero interest in Bart Scott and Bryan Thomas and in fact, neither one is in the NFL right now.