Jump to content


Roster turnover


  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1 The Big Cat

The Big Cat

    Prowling.

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,509 posts

Posted 09 October 2013 - 02:31 PM

Below is a comparison between the roster (including reserves) from week 17 2012 and week 6 2013.

I wanted to bring it up re: Levitre, that only so many changes can happen in one offseason--in this case HALF the roster being gutted.

Anyways. Take a look, I'm curious as to what thoughts come to mind.

Posted Image

#2 Nanker

Nanker

    Blls Nation Unite!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,769 posts

Posted 09 October 2013 - 02:40 PM

Turnovers! Ummmm!
Posted Image

Seriously, we had some old and bad and bad old players on the DLine, LB corps and DBs.
The QB position's been atrocious for years and has been reasonably addressed - but I look for them to draft another QB in 2014.
I think we'll be stable at WR for a few years, but the OL needs to be addressed in the Draft/FA.

#3 Nervous Guy

Nervous Guy

    Old timer

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,892 posts

Posted 09 October 2013 - 02:49 PM

Putrid????

#4 Nanker

Nanker

    Blls Nation Unite!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,769 posts

Posted 09 October 2013 - 02:58 PM

View PostNervous Guy, on 09 October 2013 - 02:49 PM, said:

Putrid????
That turnover looks quite fresh to me!

I remember doing similar research as TBC did when Levi took over as GM and compared him to Donna-ho.
Bottom line is a team that churns its HC and staff over every three years will be doing the same to their roster.
Whaley's young. Hopefully he lasts and can have a decent shot at rebuilding a winning franchise here.
It doesn't happen in a single year. I think they've made strides in the right directly, but it will all be for naught if we get a new HC in 2015.

#5 over 20 years of fanhood

over 20 years of fanhood

    if at first you don't succeed, maybe failure is your style

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,275 posts

Posted 09 October 2013 - 03:04 PM

Speadsheets make football seem more like work.

My observation;

I see a lot of red green and white.

#6 The Big Cat

The Big Cat

    Prowling.

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,509 posts

Posted 09 October 2013 - 03:12 PM

View Postover 20 years of fanhood, on 09 October 2013 - 03:04 PM, said:

Speadsheets make football seem more like work.

My observation;

I see a lot of red green and white.

At a glance: we completely revamped our QB's, our LB's, our DB's and added key players to the DL.

Since we all agree LG hasn't cost us any games, I think it's important to note that expectations for addressing the "most replaceable position in football" should be tempered accordingly.

#7 GG

GG

    Exit 151

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,737 posts

Posted 09 October 2013 - 03:19 PM

Hey, there were already a lot of threads on "Buddy left the roster in better shape than the one he inherited."

#8 joesixpack

joesixpack

    PORNSTACHE

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 28,174 posts

Posted 09 October 2013 - 03:19 PM

View PostThe Big Cat, on 09 October 2013 - 03:12 PM, said:

At a glance: we completely revamped our QB's, our LB's, our DB's and added key players to the DL.

Since we all agree LG hasn't cost us any games, I think it's important to note that expectations for addressing the "most replaceable position in football" should be tempered accordingly.

What, was powerpoint not available? ;)

"Mmmmmyeah I'll need those TPS reports by Tuesday."