San Jose Bills Fan, on 05 January 2014 - 08:40 PM, said:
Cheddar's Dad is also a poster who watches O-line play.
BillsVet is another one who watches line play.
Well then. They are signed up. Too bad if they don't like it. PM them, and tell them that their presence is required.
jboyst62, on 05 January 2014 - 10:05 PM, said:
I'll work on watching some film in the next couple months and work on this. I'm getting rewind again in a few weeks and will watch all the games again
Max997, on 05 January 2014 - 10:07 PM, said:
I'm not going to get into the skill set of each but my personal opinion is
Not signed up.
If you can't or won't get into the skill set of each...then this thread...is not for you.
This is the: Comprehensive Bills O Line Evaluation thread.
Not the: Comprehensive College O Line Prospects Evaluation thread.
I appreciate the effort and enthusiasm of looking at the college guys, but, it's just not enough for this thread.
Big Blitz, on 06 January 2014 - 12:18 AM, said:
Glenn is really good. Will become a top 5 LT in the league.
Wood is a great pass pro center. He can be overpowered at times but not often. He is a top 5 center in the AFC.
Urbik I'm convinced was hurt the 2nd half of the year. Very good run blocker but I think he was hindered by a bad knee.
Pears is interesting. He is a great depth guy but cant be a starter. If the Bills arent sold on any skill guy at 9 I can see them taking the Tackle from Bama. He plays RT.
LG can be addressed via free agency but I think DMs philosophy is to develop. Which is fine. So I wouldn't be surprised if we drafted a center and moved him here.
Need more here. For example: why are you convinced that Urbik was hurt? Why can't Pears be a starter?
Pete, on 06 January 2014 - 01:03 AM, said:
Cyril Richardson would do wonders for this line
Not signed up.
Throwing names at us, without rationale and/or backed up by stats = FAIL. FAIL will not be tolerated.
Compliance is mandatory.
Edited by OCinBuffalo, 06 January 2014 - 01:19 AM.