Jump to content


Robert Woods vs Sammy Watkins combine


  • Please log in to reply
39 replies to this topic

#1 Buffaloed in Pa

Buffaloed in Pa

    CLEAN PLAYER

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,460 posts

Posted 03 March 2014 - 05:31 PM

I know they are not the same type players,but.


Sammy 40- 4.43 Woods 4.42
verticle 34    33 1`2
    bench    16 reps 14 reps

Sammy 6-1 211   Woods 6-0 1`2  201

#2 Johnny Hammersticks

Johnny Hammersticks

    You want a beer? How about some ether?

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,521 posts

Posted 03 March 2014 - 06:40 PM

Sooooo?  Is your point that we shouldn't draft Watkins because we have a WR with similar measurables?  Is your point that Woods is #1 WR material because of his measurables, so no need to draft one early?  Not flaming you...I just don't understand the thread.

#3 Proteus

Proteus

    Practice Squad

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 137 posts

Posted 03 March 2014 - 06:47 PM

Only if anticipation and being able to see where the play is going could be measured at the combine...  but this guy might be on to something.  What if the NFL heads in the direction where instead of actually playing games, the just run weekly combines for all 22 starters and the team with the best measurables wins?

#4 Baba Booey

Baba Booey

    Practice Squad

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 113 posts

Posted 03 March 2014 - 07:16 PM

Thats why I am saying Mike Evans, big, strong and quick. He is the big reciever we have been needing for years.

#5 Justice

Justice

    It's Our Time!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,576 posts

Posted 03 March 2014 - 07:22 PM

40 time is different than playing speed. Watkins plays faster than Woody.

#6 Big Hurt

Big Hurt

    Practice Squad

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 238 posts

Posted 03 March 2014 - 07:32 PM

Watkins is a more dynamic player. He seems like to be able to score any time the ball was in his hands. It is worth a first round pick.

#7 DanInUticaTampa

DanInUticaTampa

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,940 posts

Posted 03 March 2014 - 09:34 PM

View PostBaba Booey, on 03 March 2014 - 07:16 PM, said:

Thats why I am saying Mike Evans, big, strong and quick. He is the big reciever we have been needing for years.

Yeah, havent had a receiver like Evans since hardy!

#8 FluffHead

FluffHead

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,793 posts

Posted 03 March 2014 - 09:41 PM

The biggest difference between Watkins and most receivers is he is like a top notch running back after the catch

#9 BillsVet

BillsVet

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,371 posts

Posted 03 March 2014 - 09:51 PM

Good thing Watkins will never wear a Bills jersey.  Even if he's available at 9, his agent happens to be...Eugene Parker.

#10 Triple Threat

Triple Threat

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,114 posts

Posted 03 March 2014 - 09:53 PM

View PostBaba Booey, on 03 March 2014 - 07:16 PM, said:

Thats why I am saying Mike Evans, big, strong and quick. He is the big reciever we have been needing for years.

What's why you're saying Mike Evans?

Edited by Triple Threat, 03 March 2014 - 09:54 PM.


#11 Max997

Max997

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,616 posts

Posted 03 March 2014 - 10:02 PM

View PostBuffaloed in Pa, on 03 March 2014 - 05:31 PM, said:

I know they are not the same type players,but.


                     Sammy 40- 4.43     Woods 4.42
     verticle                 34                           33 1`2
    bench                   16 reps                    14 reps

             Sammy 6-1 211          Woods 6-0 1`2  201

Where did you get those numbers for Woods?

I thought he was more like 5'11" 190 Lbs

#12 Buffaloed in Pa

Buffaloed in Pa

    CLEAN PLAYER

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,460 posts

Posted 04 March 2014 - 04:50 PM

Combine numbers Max. NFL. Combine

#13 Luxy312

Luxy312

    RFA

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 942 posts

Posted 04 March 2014 - 05:07 PM

Track/field versus real football play.  Could give a rats arse!

#14 enlightener

enlightener

    Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 268 posts

Posted 04 March 2014 - 07:03 PM

View PostJohnny Hammersticks, on 03 March 2014 - 06:40 PM, said:

Sooooo?  Is your point that we shouldn't draft Watkins because we have a WR with similar measurables?  Is your point that Woods is #1 WR material because of his measurables, so no need to draft one early?  Not flaming you...I just don't understand the thread.
his point is the numbers are close, also woods is already a Bill and Watkins might be.   also their is a draft coming up and its interesting to know things.    what don't you understand?

#15 Buffaloed in Pa

Buffaloed in Pa

    CLEAN PLAYER

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,460 posts

Posted 04 March 2014 - 08:50 PM

That`s right enlightener, nothing more or less. Some just ready to pick a fight over anything.

#16 Fixxxer

Fixxxer

    Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,897 posts

Posted 04 March 2014 - 09:03 PM

Watkins looks more explosive on the football filed, whereas Woods is like he glides on it.

#17 DreamOnDan

DreamOnDan

    RFA

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,045 posts

Posted 04 March 2014 - 09:21 PM

View PostBuffaloed in Pa, on 03 March 2014 - 05:31 PM, said:

I know they are not the same type players,but.


Sammy 40- 4.43 Woods 4.42
verticle 34    33 1`2
bench    16 reps 14 reps

Sammy 6-1 211   Woods 6-0 1`2  201

ANY CHANCE SOMEBODY WILL ALSO PUT UP THE REST OF THE BILLS WR?  TE?  RB?  WR be enough...

#18 Johnny Hammersticks

Johnny Hammersticks

    You want a beer? How about some ether?

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,521 posts

Posted 05 March 2014 - 08:00 AM

View PostBuffaloed in Pa, on 04 March 2014 - 08:50 PM, said:

That`s right enlightener, nothing more or less. Some just ready to pick a fight over anything.

I merely asked, in a polite way, for the OP to clarify the point of their thread (which it appears there is none).  How is that "some just ready to pick a fight over anything"?

So Woods and Watkins have similar combine #s.  Completely different players.  I'm sure many current Bills players have similar "measurables" as current draft prospects.  Should I start threads devoted to each Bill and their respective combine doppelgänger?  Without any context or elaboration?  Get real.

#19 bigK14094

bigK14094

    RFA

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 527 posts

Posted 05 March 2014 - 08:59 AM

View PostBillsVet, on 03 March 2014 - 09:51 PM, said:

Good thing Watkins will never wear a Bills jersey.  Even if he's available at 9, his agent happens to be...Eugene Parker.
IMHO, you have a valid point, even if you made the comment toung in cheek.   Parker is an impediment to the business of fielding a winning football team.......and it is at least a consideration to avoid his clients.  IMHO

#20 C.Biscuit97

C.Biscuit97

    Ladies' Man

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,210 posts

Posted 05 March 2014 - 09:04 AM

This is pretty much why I want Evans.  I have no doubt Watkins is a better talent than Woods.  But I just question if he is that much better than Woods or SJ to spend a top 10 pick on.  I know half the board hates SJ, but people would go crazy if Watkins matched SJ's production for the previous 3 years.  Huge difference from the NFL to the ACC.  I'm just not a fan of a 6'1" wr when you already have 2 similar skilled set players on the roster.