Jump to content


Photo

Refugee Crisis in the U. S. (?)


  • Please log in to reply
410 replies to this topic

#21 FireChan

FireChan

    All Pro

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,964 posts

Posted 17 November 2015 - 01:16 PM

They are escaping terrorism. That is totally blaming the victim 

Escape elsewhere.



#22 DC Tom

DC Tom

    Also sniping at retards from the balcony

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 60,757 posts

Posted 17 November 2015 - 01:18 PM

 CUBwvNXU8AAm9Yr.png# of D.C. accepted refugees last month...ZERO

 

 

 

 

 

 So...........According to WaPo, one snub and all Muslims will become barbaric terrorists.

 

If that's not racism, nothing is. 

 

 

There's nowhere to put refugees in DC.



#23 joesixpack

joesixpack

    Hell Bent

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 36,756 posts

Posted 17 November 2015 - 01:18 PM

 

 

There's nowhere to put refugees in DC.

 

White house has spare rooms.



#24 DC Tom

DC Tom

    Also sniping at retards from the balcony

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 60,757 posts

Posted 17 November 2015 - 01:20 PM

 

White house has spare rooms.

 

Really?  You couldn't go "Georgetown University has safe zones?"  



#25 B-Man

B-Man

    All Pro

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,694 posts

Posted 17 November 2015 - 01:23 PM

 

 

There's nowhere to put refugees in DC.

 

 

rfk-stadium-300x147.jpg?ac4b2d RFK ?...................DC United won't mind.

 

 

Of course you know I'm joking around Tom (some of our simpler posters may not)

 

The point of the map was to show where the refugee industry is utilizing (SEE POST #15)



#26 DC Tom

DC Tom

    Also sniping at retards from the balcony

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 60,757 posts

Posted 17 November 2015 - 01:27 PM

 

 

rfk-stadium-300x147.jpg?ac4b2d RFK ?...................DC United won't mind.

 

 

Of course you know I'm joking around Tom (some of our simpler posters may not)

 

The point of the map was to show where the refugee industry is utilizing (SEE POST #15)

 

Then it's a weak point.  In as much as there's a "refugee industry," you really think DC lobbyists and corporations aren't heavily involved?  Don't follow the refugees, follow the money - the only reasons people will take either extremist view of "Let all the poor, unwashed, tortured souls in" or "Keep all the sand !@#$s away" is revenue or votes.



#27 drinkTHEkoolaid

drinkTHEkoolaid

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,298 posts

Posted 17 November 2015 - 01:39 PM

 
Then it's a weak point.  In as much as there's a "refugee industry," you really think DC lobbyists and corporations aren't heavily involved?  Don't follow the refugees, follow the money - the only reasons people will take either extremist view of "Let all the poor, unwashed, tortured souls in" or "Keep all the sand !@#$s away" is revenue or votes.


Typically if there is an issue that doesn't appear to be logical or make sense, look to see who gains the most (money,power,votes) as Tom said above as guidance to try and understand the underlying forces that affect an issue. Tom bauerle frequently makes this point as well.

#28 B-Large

B-Large

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,262 posts

Posted 17 November 2015 - 07:17 PM

They are escaping terrorism. That is totally blaming the victim


Why don't they stick around take up the fight for their country?

#29 truth on hold

truth on hold

    All Pro

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,202 posts

Posted 17 November 2015 - 07:20 PM

My response at the border entrance:
 
"Go be a Terrorist somewhere else"

Yeah

syrian-child-dead-horrific-life-as-we-kn

#30 B-Man

B-Man

    All Pro

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,694 posts

Posted 18 November 2015 - 08:28 AM

WHITE HOUSE WON'T TELL GOVS WHERE SENDING REFUGEES...

 

 

 

 

Resettlement group admits: We don't track them...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Obama’s inaction plants doubt he can keep America safe
by Michael Goodwin

 

Original Article

#31 B-Man

B-Man

    All Pro

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,694 posts

Posted 18 November 2015 - 10:42 AM

Krauthammer’s Take: Let in Women, Children, and Refugees over 50
 
Charles Krauthammer says that while he doesn’t support Republican governors who proclaim Syrian refugees are unwelcome, ”they deserve some respect, a lot more than the president gave with his preening address he gave yesterday.”
 
“Remember, he’s the one that decided against the begging, the advice, recommendations of all of his top advisers, to do nothing at the beginning of the Syrian civil war,” Krauthammer said on Tuesday’s Special Report. “He could have established easily, a safe zone. The way that we did for over a decade in Kurdistan, in Iraq. It wouldn’t have cost boots on the ground.
 
” “And he decided, because he didn’t want to sully his reputation as a man who ends war and doesn’t start them, he denied them,” Krauthammer continued. ”So now he’s attacking people who are worried about the danger to the very people Obama abandoned. And forced into refugee status.”
 
Krauthammer floated his own proposal: Given the new circumstances, you allow the women and the children and the men over 50. As you did in the past. But you’re extra-careful, extra scrutiny for the men of fighting age, the ones who do this stuff. And for each of them, you require a positive vetting, not just the absence of a negative one.

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner


#32 DC Tom

DC Tom

    Also sniping at retards from the balcony

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 60,757 posts

Posted 18 November 2015 - 10:58 AM

 

Krauthammer’s Take: Let in Women, Children, and Refugees over 50
 
Charles Krauthammer says that while he doesn’t support Republican governors who proclaim Syrian refugees are unwelcome, ”they deserve some respect, a lot more than the president gave with his preening address he gave yesterday.”
 
“Remember, he’s the one that decided against the begging, the advice, recommendations of all of his top advisers, to do nothing at the beginning of the Syrian civil war,” Krauthammer said on Tuesday’s Special Report. “He could have established easily, a safe zone. The way that we did for over a decade in Kurdistan, in Iraq. It wouldn’t have cost boots on the ground.
 
” “And he decided, because he didn’t want to sully his reputation as a man who ends war and doesn’t start them, he denied them,” Krauthammer continued. ”So now he’s attacking people who are worried about the danger to the very people Obama abandoned. And forced into refugee status.”
 
Krauthammer floated his own proposal: Given the new circumstances, you allow the women and the children and the men over 50. As you did in the past. But you’re extra-careful, extra scrutiny for the men of fighting age, the ones who do this stuff. And for each of them, you require a positive vetting, not just the absence of a negative one.

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner

 

 

Did he completely miss where at least two of the suicide bombers in Paris were women?



#33 B-Man

B-Man

    All Pro

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,694 posts

Posted 18 November 2015 - 11:08 AM

 

Did he completely miss where at least two of the suicide bombers in Paris were women?

 

I doubt that sir, but the plan is still preferable to the administrations'.

 

 

 

Al-Qaida magazine cites weakness of Buffalo Niagara region. http://www.buffalonews.com/city-region/politics/al-qaida-magazine-cites-weakness-of-buffalo-niagara-region-20140320 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The best example of the horrific consequences of not vetting someone.

 

 

 

barack-obama.vadapt.320.medium.51.jpg



#34 drinkTHEkoolaid

drinkTHEkoolaid

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,298 posts

Posted 18 November 2015 - 11:09 AM

What happens, when/if refugees are let in who ultimately commit acts of violence and/or terrorism?

What happens then? Who is held accountable?

#35 TakeYouToTasker

TakeYouToTasker

    The smartest man in the room.

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,836 posts

Posted 18 November 2015 - 11:14 AM

What happens, when/if refugees are let in who ultimately commit acts of violence and/or terrorism?

What happens then? Who is held accountable?

Republicans.



#36 DC Tom

DC Tom

    Also sniping at retards from the balcony

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 60,757 posts

Posted 18 November 2015 - 11:14 AM

What happens, when/if refugees are let in who ultimately commit acts of violence and/or terrorism?

What happens then? Who is held accountable?

 

Republicans.



#37 GG

GG

    Exit 151

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 26,706 posts

Posted 18 November 2015 - 11:45 AM

Republicans.

 

 

 

Republicans.

 

And those damned kids in the van and the pesky dog



#38 unbillievable

unbillievable

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,001 posts

Posted 18 November 2015 - 12:35 PM

It's the perfect liberal plan. 

 

They flood the country with refugees which allows them to call Republicans racist.

When the terrorists start shooting, they can pass laws to ban guns. it's a win-win.



#39 LABillzFan

LABillzFan

    Plan Ahea!!!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 35,116 posts

Posted 18 November 2015 - 12:53 PM

What happens, when/if refugees are let in who ultimately commit acts of violence and/or terrorism?

 

Free college, free healthcare, free housing and free phone for each of them. 

 

The left will turn them into society-draining government-dependent progressive slugs in no time, and once they're playing Candy Crush and watching cat videos, they'll have no time to blow things up.

 

America. Winning. Leftist style.


Edited by LABillzFan, 18 November 2015 - 12:53 PM.


#40 B-Man

B-Man

    All Pro

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,694 posts

Posted 18 November 2015 - 02:02 PM

No need to worry about national security...............the administration is on it.

 

 

White House Launches #REFUGEESWELCOME Hashtag