Jump to content


Photo

Refugee Crisis in the U. S. (?)


  • Please log in to reply
410 replies to this topic

#401 joesixpack

joesixpack

    Hell Bent

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 36,756 posts

Posted 07 May 2017 - 07:57 AM

.

#402 Tiberius

Tiberius

    All Pro

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,658 posts

Posted 07 May 2017 - 01:41 PM

Only going to get worse with global warming.

#403 grinreaper

grinreaper

    RFA

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,098 posts

Posted 09 May 2017 - 04:18 PM

https://conservative...e-rifle-school/

Mario Granados-Alvarado is an illegal alien from El Salvador. He was caught by Border Patrol in 2014, determined to be in the country illegally, and ordered to appear before an immigration judge to begin deportation proceedings. Because of President Obama’s catch-and-release policy at the time, Alvarado was given a notice to appear in court and released back into society.

He has absolutely no right to be in this country. Last week, Alvarado was arrested by Montgomery County Police after he drove a stolen car into a local high school parking lot. When officers opened the trunk, the found a rifle that was stolen from a police officer’s car.

Let’s just pause for a second. An illegal alien was arrested for stealing a car and a police officer’s rifle. Police also found a second stolen gun in the car. When the police ran his name and finger prints, they learned that he had an active deportation order against him.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement immediately asked the Montgomery Police to hold Alvarado so that Federal agents could make an arrest. Instead, Mario Alvarado was released from jail on just $2,000 bail.

They arrested an illegal alien on vehicular theft and stealing a police officer’s gun, not to mention the fact that he brought the gun to a school. He was thrown in jail on a Monday and back on the street by Wednesday. Thank goodness that ICE agents were able to make an arrest after the local police set him free. Otherwise, there is no telling the damage he would be doing right now.

This is what sanctuary city policies look like. They protect illegal aliens and let them bring stolen police guns to schools. They let illegal alien habitual drunk drivers get behind the wheel one more time and kill innocent people. It’s absolute madness.

In the same Maryland County, prosecutors announced this week that they were dropping charges against two illegal aliens suspected of raping a freshman girl in a high school bathroom because there wasn’t enough evidence to prove the encounter wasn’t consensual. Where are these illegal aliens now? Are they being deported? Nope.

President Trump ordered the Department of Justice to begin cracking down on sanctuary cities but an Obama mega-donor, who was made a Federal judge, blocked Attorney General Jeff Sessions from taking any action against sanctuary jurisdictions.

Federal Judge William Orrick ruled that it is unconstitutional for the President of the United States to instruct the Attorney General to devise a way to legally and constitutionally punish sanctuary cities. If that decision confuses you, it should. There is no logic there, only politics. It is no surprise that a man who donated and bundled close to a quarter million dollars for Obama’s election campaign would issue a ruling like this.

#404 DC Tom

DC Tom

    Also sniping at retards from the balcony

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 60,757 posts

Posted 09 May 2017 - 06:08 PM

In the same Maryland County, prosecutors announced this week that they were dropping charges against two illegal aliens suspected of raping a freshman girl in a high school bathroom because there wasn’t enough evidence to prove the encounter wasn’t consensual. Where are these illegal aliens now? Are they being deported? Nope.
 

 

Actually, yep.  The rape charges were dropped, but one of them was charged (and the other has charges pending) with possession and distribution of child pornography, and released on his own recognizance, and was picked up by ICE for deportation as they left the courthouse.

 

But of course now the city of Rockville wants them released by ICE, because if they're deported Rockville can't try the case.  In which case, Rockville sends them home...and is required by law to home-school them at taxpayer expense, since they can't go back to school...

 

It's just down the street from me, too.  I wish I didn't have to hear about it every day.  It's a real circus.



#405 B-Man

B-Man

    All Pro

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,694 posts

Posted 09 May 2017 - 06:10 PM

Hilarious.................. :lol:

 

 

Judge Gets ACLU to Admit it Would Have No Problem with Travel Ban Under Hillary
It’s only “unconstitutional” under President Trump.

 

In testimony on Monday before the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, an attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union was forced to admit that the only problem the organization has with Trump’s travel ban from terror-tied countries is the president himself. Had the executive order been signed by, say, President Hillary Clinton, it would’ve been totes constitutional.

 

In an audio clip posted at C-SPAN, ACLU lawyer Omar Jadwat argued that President Trump’s travel ban was unconstitutional because of his previous campaign rhetoric about Muslims and not necessarily the order itself. Judge Paul Niemeyer recoiled at that idea and posed, “If a different candidate had won the election and then issued this order, I gather you wouldn’t have any problem with that?”

 

Initially, Jadwat skirted a direct answer, but Niemeyer persisted: “We have a candidate who won the presidency -- some candidate other than President Trump won the presidency and then chose to issue this particular order, with whatever counsel he took… Do I understand that just in that circumstance, the executive order should be honored?”

 

Jadwat replied:

“Yes, your honor, I think in that case, it could be constitutional.”

 

Judge Dennis Shedd chimed in and asked Jadwat pointedly, “Is [the executive order] legitimate on its face or not in your opinion?”

 

“I don’t think so, your honor, because the order is completely unprecedented in our nation’s history,” Jadwat replied, ignoring Obama’s similar Muslim travel ban.

 

Aghast, Judge Shedd asked incredulously, “So, the first order on anything is invalid?”

The audio ends there but it’s enough to display the inherent bias within the so-called civil rights organization of the ACLU.

 

As Powerline blog noted, “As usual, the liberals have no coherent theory. Basically, they believe that anything they don’t like is unconstitutional. And ‘unconstitutional,’ for them, has nothing to do with the actual written document called the Constitution, the charter on which our nation is founded. ‘Unconstitutional’ merely means something they don’t like.”

 

The sad fact is that Democratic presidents appoint Democratic judges who are willing to subscribe to such lawless nonsense.

 

http://www.powerline...er-is-trump.php

 



#406 B-Man

B-Man

    All Pro

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,694 posts

Posted 10 May 2017 - 01:48 PM

Illegal immigrant deported 15 times seriously injures 6-year-old in DUI hit-and-run

 

 

Catch and release and repeat and repeat and repeat……..



#407 B-Man

B-Man

    All Pro

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,694 posts

Posted 15 May 2017 - 10:42 AM

Somali Refugee Flow to Minnesota Slows Dramatically.

 

It's a mystery..........



#408 B-Man

B-Man

    All Pro

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,694 posts

Posted 20 May 2017 - 01:16 PM

 “The majority of individuals arrested last year for Class A drug trafficking in the city of Boston were not U.S. citizens and most of those non-citizens were Dominican foreign nationals.”

 

 

You know what would be easier than acknowledging this problem ?

 

Calling people who point it out racists.................that will solve it.



#409 HappyDays

HappyDays

    RFA

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 598 posts

Posted Yesterday, 04:57 PM

http://www.npr.org/s...vel-ban-on-hold

4th circuit court of appeals upheld the block on Trump's travel ban in a 10-3 decision. They used basically the same reasoning as the 9th circuit did, that Trump and his surrogates were very up front about the true intended purpose of the ban, and that there was no evidence to suggest immigrants from the chosen countries were an undue danger to national security.

Might end up going to the Supreme Court. We will see.

#410 joesixpack

joesixpack

    Hell Bent

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 36,756 posts

Posted Yesterday, 05:30 PM

.

#411 Golden*Wheels

Golden*Wheels

    Probation

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 27 posts

Posted Yesterday, 07:38 PM

http://www.npr.org/s...vel-ban-on-hold

4th circuit court of appeals upheld the block on Trump's travel ban in a 10-3 decision. They used basically the same reasoning as the 9th circuit did, that Trump and his surrogates were very up front about the true intended purpose of the ban, and that there was no evidence to suggest immigrants from the chosen countries were an undue danger to national security.

Might end up going to the Supreme Court. We will see.

It's an interesting situation. An order which seems completely legal in it's final form being undone by previously stated illegal motives.