Jump to content


Photo

Interesting 7 round mock.


  • Please log in to reply
64 replies to this topic

#1 PIZ

PIZ

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,199 posts

Posted 29 March 2017 - 05:46 PM

http://billswire.usa...lls-selections/

#2 jrober38

jrober38

    Practice Squad

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 237 posts

Posted 29 March 2017 - 05:50 PM

The first five picks are outstanding. 



#3 Mike in Horseheads

Mike in Horseheads

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,357 posts

Posted 29 March 2017 - 05:59 PM

Here's a idea, write a summary with the outcome then put the link as backup.



#4 Pbomb

Pbomb

    Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 414 posts

Posted 29 March 2017 - 06:11 PM

Here's a idea, write a summary with the outcome then put the link as backup.

i hate when the writers make you click through ten pages to see a list

#5 KollegeStudnet

KollegeStudnet

    on like a mofo

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,539 posts

Posted 29 March 2017 - 06:20 PM

Love all the trades. I can see them moving back and collecting picks.

#6 H2o

H2o

    2017 - Offseason is the Season of Hope

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,053 posts

Posted 29 March 2017 - 06:21 PM

I'm surprised there wasn't a picture of the Peter Pan guy mixed in because that's as close to Never Never Land an article can get

#7 Antonio

Antonio

    Probation

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 37 posts

Posted 29 March 2017 - 06:25 PM

Good picks, impossible trades. No way someone ofers that much.



#8 JaCrispy

JaCrispy

    Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 321 posts

Posted 29 March 2017 - 06:37 PM

i like the idea of trading...however if we dropped that far down without coming away with a 2018 1st round pick included, it's a waste imo.



#9 oldmanfan

oldmanfan

    RFA

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 815 posts

Posted 29 March 2017 - 06:44 PM

Interesting. Doubt that many teams want to trade up (who would Seattle be targeting??).

#10 PromoTheRobot

PromoTheRobot

    Gug, you're #1 in my book.

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 32,737 posts

Posted 29 March 2017 - 06:45 PM

The first five picks are outstanding. 

Isn't WR Ross a tad undersized?



#11 KellyToughII

KellyToughII

    RFA

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 614 posts

Posted 29 March 2017 - 07:01 PM

I would be impressed if we could just do those trades.  Not taking a  QB in 3rd or 4th is my only argument



#12 Madd Charlie

Madd Charlie

    Practice Squad

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 138 posts

Posted 29 March 2017 - 07:04 PM

It would be cool if it happened but highly doubtful. With so many roster spots and needs and no 4th round pick, there will be at least one trade. I'm looking for someone to want to hop in front of Cleveland to get a QB and hopefully we still end up with M. Williams C. Davis OJ Howard or M Lattimore



#13 par73

par73

    Practice Squad

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 128 posts

Posted 29 March 2017 - 07:12 PM

Don't like a small, injury-prone receiver in the 1st. And I don't think Godwin will last that long.


Edited by par73, 29 March 2017 - 07:28 PM.


#14 Jamie Muellers Ghost

Jamie Muellers Ghost

    Practice Squad

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 229 posts

Posted 29 March 2017 - 07:31 PM

Crazy, unrealistic, fantasy inspired trades waste of time

#15 Mark Vader

Mark Vader

    All Pro

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,743 posts

Posted 29 March 2017 - 07:59 PM

The first five picks are outstanding. 

Absolutely. I would be extremely happy with this draft.

 

Although drafting 3 WR's is a bit much. With that many picks we wouldn't draft 1 OL?

 

My favorite, aside from drafting Jake Butt, is that we don't waste a pick on a QB! :worthy:

 

 

Good picks, impossible trades. No way someone ofers that much.

Yeah that does seem unlikely. I do like the idea of trading down though.


Edited by Mark Vader, 29 March 2017 - 08:00 PM.


#16 NewEra

NewEra

    I don't "know", I "think"

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,077 posts

Posted 29 March 2017 - 08:10 PM

Best scenario ever. .00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001% chance of that happening. Most of the guys taken are going to be drafted before the respective picks and there's no chance we get all that from Seattle. If it happens I think we'd be a SB contender once we upgrade the QB

#17 BarleyNY

BarleyNY

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,633 posts

Posted 29 March 2017 - 08:17 PM

Good picks, impossible trades. No way someone ofers that much.


It is in line with the traditional draft value chart, but teams rarely give up such a high quantity of picks for a single pick. It just screams that the writer said "The Bills have a bunch of needs and I've got a lot of players I like, so I'll just engineer a trade that'll make it all happen."

#18 LABILLBACKER

LABILLBACKER

    Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 376 posts

Posted 29 March 2017 - 08:20 PM

I'm surprised there wasn't a picture of the Peter Pan guy mixed in because that's as close to Never Never Land an article can get



#19 PIZ

PIZ

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,199 posts

Posted 29 March 2017 - 08:21 PM

Obviously unlikely, but I love the idea of trading down a few times to get an extra 2, 3, 4, 5, etc. Load this team up with some new guys that are a fit for this new team. The Bills needs lots of new talent, not 1 superstar.

#20 LABILLBACKER

LABILLBACKER

    Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 376 posts

Posted 29 March 2017 - 08:22 PM

Agreed...silly and unrealistic scenario...we're not getting that many picks...I would like to get a 4th round pick somehow?