Jump to content


Photo

Interesting 7 round mock.


  • Please log in to reply
64 replies to this topic

#21 PIZ

PIZ

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,199 posts

Posted 29 March 2017 - 08:22 PM

By the way.....why is everyone so serious all the time?

#22 stuvian

stuvian

    Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 433 posts

Posted 29 March 2017 - 09:30 PM

why don't we just draft the entire Huskies roster and get it over with? No QB = fail. Ross looks like a track star not a football player. No thanks



#23 QuoteTheRaven83

QuoteTheRaven83

    RFA

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 929 posts

Posted 29 March 2017 - 09:35 PM

Too many Huskies.

 

No thanks



#24 Mark Vader

Mark Vader

    All Pro

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,527 posts

Posted 30 March 2017 - 01:39 AM

Agreed...silly and unrealistic scenario...we're not getting that many picks...I would like to get a 4th round pick somehow?

Trading down to pick up a 4th round pick would not be difficult.



#25 wilcoam

wilcoam

    Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 280 posts

Posted 30 March 2017 - 01:53 AM

I would be in 7th heaven if our Bills could trade down like that

It would wipe out was has for me been a rather disappointing and underwhelming off season, coaching change aside  

I'd revaluate my feelings that DW has to go 

Drafting THREE new WR's would be uber exciting for us fans 

Heck I'd take just Ross and Goodwin in a milli-second 

However I highly doubt anything like this happens and that Seattle would offer that much 

Plus what's with all the safeties?

Hey, I'm one of the few here not all that big on Poyer and Hyde starting, but we didn't spent 9M this year on backups

Replace 2 of those safeties with CB's and a RT and this is close to perfection

Too bad it's fantastical 

 

jc



#26 Kirby Jackson

Kirby Jackson

    All Pro

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,505 posts

Posted 30 March 2017 - 07:56 AM

That draft would be a home run. I don't think that the trade down scenario is reasonable but this would be amazing.

#27 xsoldier54

xsoldier54

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,331 posts

Posted 30 March 2017 - 08:57 AM

Love this draft.  Lots of holes addressed.



#28 Watkins101

Watkins101

    UDFA

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 97 posts

Posted 30 March 2017 - 08:58 AM

I would be uber excited if this were to happen. Bills would automatically check off wide reciever, cb, from their needs, and then see about the lbs and safeties they got.



#29 DallasBillsFan1

DallasBillsFan1

    Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 329 posts

Posted 30 March 2017 - 09:22 AM

Isn't WR Ross a tad undersized?

This.  I know nothing about this kid, maybe he's a gamer, but 5'11"??  Haven't we gone down this path before with smaller receivers ... geez



#30 BuffaloHokie13

BuffaloHokie13

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,090 posts

Posted 30 March 2017 - 09:27 AM

This.  I know nothing about this kid, maybe he's a gamer, but 5'11"??  Haven't we gone down this path before with smaller receivers ... geez

 

I think Ross is more of a WR with track speed as opposed to Graham/Goodwin who's a track guy with okayish hands.



#31 wppete

wppete

    Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 484 posts

Posted 30 March 2017 - 09:34 AM

If we can pull something like this off and trade backs this would be amazing. 



#32 gr8billsfan

gr8billsfan

    Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 481 posts

Posted 30 March 2017 - 10:15 AM

3 players from Washington? Is that a lot or...?



#33 Bray Wyatt

Bray Wyatt

    Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 393 posts

Posted 30 March 2017 - 10:20 AM

Has Whaley ever traded down? I mean 2013 was technically Nix, so who knows if he had say in that or not but I remember Buddy saying after the draft he was worried about trading down again as he didn't want to risk missing out on their guy so he seemed to authorize those trades.



#34 Bill from NYC

Bill from NYC

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,067 posts

Posted 30 March 2017 - 10:33 AM

That draft sucks. It should have put more emphasis on the secondary. That is how you build a winning team!

#35 Mickey

Mickey

    All Pro

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,673 posts

Posted 30 March 2017 - 10:39 AM

Interesting. Doubt that many teams want to trade up (who would Seattle be targeting??).

Exactly. Every year, one genius after another comes up with fairy dust scenarios where we trade down for a raft of picks. And it never happens because of the plain and simple fact that everyone wants to trade down and hardly any one wants to trade up. What player is good enough to attract a trading partner who, despite his greatness, is still around at the 10th pick and coincidentally, is not good enough for us to take him? 



#36 Rise Up Lights

Rise Up Lights

    RFA

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 951 posts

Posted 30 March 2017 - 10:40 AM

Championship

#37 PromoTheRobot

PromoTheRobot

    See Bufffalo-inspired art at www.inkwellstudios.com

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 32,407 posts

Posted 30 March 2017 - 10:57 AM

Exactly. Every year, one genius after another comes up with fairy dust scenarios where we trade down for a raft of picks. And it never happens because of the plain and simple fact that everyone wants to trade down and hardly any one wants to trade up. What player is good enough to attract a trading partner who, despite his greatness, is still around at the 10th pick and coincidentally, is not good enough for us to take him? 


I thought the rule is if someone offers you a trade you have to take it.

Edited by PromoTheRobot, 30 March 2017 - 10:58 AM.


#38 The Jokeman

The Jokeman

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,983 posts

Posted 30 March 2017 - 11:08 AM

Has Whaley ever traded down? I mean 2013 was technically Nix, so who knows if he had say in that or not but I remember Buddy saying after the draft he was worried about trading down again as he didn't want to risk missing out on their guy so he seemed to authorize those trades.

He moved down in 2014 when we drafted CuJo as we moved from pick 41 for picks 44 and pick 153 (Cyril Richardson).



#39 Bray Wyatt

Bray Wyatt

    Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 393 posts

Posted 30 March 2017 - 11:12 AM

He moved down in 2014 when we drafted CuJo as we moved from pick 41 for picks 44 and pick 153 (Cyril Richardson).

 

Thanks, I always like the idea of trading down, depends on who goes before us at 10 and how they feel about the qbs and our future at that position obviously but if they don't like the qbs I have no problem with trading down



#40 unbillievable

unbillievable

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,001 posts

Posted 30 March 2017 - 11:45 AM

Trade the next three 1st round picks for #1 overall and draft Peppers.

Trade the next three 2nd round picks for #9 overall

Trade #9 overall for #10 and two first round picks plus a punt returner.

 

Championship!