Josh Reed on the Edwards "injury"
#1
Posted 01 December 2008 - 12:14 AM
"He (Edwards) didn't say anything about it (the injury). A guy like him, he would tell you about that (injury) before he went out there and hurt the team".
Hmm....
#2
Posted 01 December 2008 - 12:21 AM
bills44, on Nov 30 2008, 10:14 PM, said:
"He (Edwards) didn't say anything about it (the injury). A guy like him, he would tell you about that (injury) before he went out there and hurt the team".
Hmm....
Unless.......uhmmmmmmm....unless he was only told of his injury himself at the beginning of the Third Quarter, and told to "play ball" about it or lose his starting job the rest of the season. This coaching staff is disgusting.
#3
Posted 01 December 2008 - 12:30 AM
#4
Posted 01 December 2008 - 12:32 AM
BBfan4lifeJH81, on Nov 30 2008, 10:30 PM, said:
:blink: Didn't he, though? As he stood there in the freezing cold, with a groin injury?????? :thumbsup: You know your coaching staff thinks very little of you as a fan base when they think they can push a lie like this over on ya.
#5
Posted 01 December 2008 - 02:27 AM
#6
Posted 01 December 2008 - 08:57 AM
Stussy109, on Dec 1 2008, 02:27 AM, said:
It was also pretty obvious that a QB controversy wouldn't have existed. We know JP won't be on this team after next year, so what's the point of telling everyone there's an injury and alienating a QB (albeit a struggling one) that is the starter for the forseeable future?
#7
Posted 01 December 2008 - 09:04 AM
#8
Posted 01 December 2008 - 09:12 AM
TheChimp, on Dec 1 2008, 12:21 AM, said:
unless he was only told of his injury himself at the beginning of the third quarter??????
and told to 'play ball' about it or lose his starting job????????
So, your theory is that Trent was injured but nobody told him about it?
Then, when he was told of his injury he was given the choice of playing or losing is job?
You are nucking futs.
#9
Posted 01 December 2008 - 09:21 AM
Beerball, on Dec 1 2008, 09:12 AM, said:
and told to 'play ball' about it or lose his starting job????????
So, your theory is that Trent was injured but nobody told him about it?
Then, when he was told of his injury he was given the choice of playing or losing is job?
You are nucking futs.
NOT INJURED
Told fox sports that he was not injured, he was fine.
Dick Jauron said in his pc that Trent suffered that injury early on in todays game.
Trent says in his pc that it was a pre-existing injury from KC.
There all lies. I am not upset about the switch, you cant allow that kind of poor play to go on regularly. which it has been. Dick should have stepped up and said we are in the middle of a tough road to the playoffs and we needed some sort of change.
P*SSY
#11
Posted 01 December 2008 - 09:24 AM
300yrds, on Dec 1 2008, 09:21 AM, said:
Told fox sports that he was not injured, he was fine.
Dick Jauron said in his pc that Trent suffered that injury early on in todays game.
Trent says in his pc that it was a pre-existing injury from KC.
There all lies. I am not upset about the switch, you cant allow that kind of poor play to go on regularly. which it has been. Dick should have stepped up and said we are in the middle of a tough road to the playoffs and we needed some sort of change.
P*SSY
I agree with you, it is BS.
I question the monkey's statements though. Read what he wrote.
Oh...if Trent said it dates to the KC game...our Bills are cheaters so some of you have gotten your wish. Don't injuries have to be disclosed?

Help










