Jump to content


Photo

Things Taylor did on the field in 2016 that kept him around


  • Please log in to reply
465 replies to this topic

#1 transplantbillsfan

transplantbillsfan

    RFA

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 949 posts

Posted 15 March 2017 - 04:40 PM

So, this place isn't exactly "home," yet.  Still weird being displaced.

 

I figured I'd introduce myself in the manner in which everybody over at BBMB knew me... as a bit of a Taylor homer.  But really, at this point, that's stretching the truth.

 

I'll just start ONE Taylor thread.  I know how much the people on this board don't like repeated threads, so here's one, long explosion of Taylor fun. 

 

I'm prepared to be pounced on.

 

I intended to post some images throughout... stills of certain plays, but I have no idea how to do that here.

 

So...

 

 

I like Tyrod Taylor. I still do. But I'll say this, I fell off the wagon of thinking he's the long term answer and more than anything, I think he's a bridge QB for a few years with the opportunity to change my mind, which is exactly why I absolutely LOVE the restructured contract.

His 4 game stretch beginning with Cincy and ending with Pittsburgh was incredibly discouraging. His game against Miami helped rebuild at least a little hope, though.

Regardless, I will say this, there are some areas of Taylor's game where I actually saw noticeable improvement over 2015. And some of those are what give me hope.

For example, I don't know how it's been over here, but over at BBMB, some folks were hypercritical about Taylor throwing over the middle; whether there's an argument of frequency or effectiveness, he just doesn't cut it.

First of all, if you're one of those concerned about the intermediate middle in particular

*According to PFF*
2015- 10/18 for 187 yards. 1 TD and 1 INT. Passer Rating of 87. 4.7% of total passes to intermediate middle
2016- 16/25 for 261 yards. 2 TDs and 0 INTs. Passer Rating of 125.6. 5.7% of total passes to intermediate middle.


Did he improve? A 1% increase in terms of the amount he passed to the intermediate middle might be negligible, but it's clear he was monumentally more efficient as a passer to the intermediate middle.  And the types of throws were more of the typical NFL intermediate middle throws with more crossing routes than 2015 (thank you Lynn... ?), although there were still plenty of those comeback routes or stop and turn routes Roman focused on.  3 specific plays I can recall (and I'd post the still images, but don't know how), include a nice little crossing pattern to Tate vs. Oakland where Taylor actually clears out the middle of the field by looking to the left before going back to the right to make the pass, a 2nd and 4 crossing pattern to Powell vs. Arizona, and a super impressive 22 yard pass directly over the middle to Goodwin to convert a 3rd and 21 vs. Cleveland.

 

​(Tangential to that last play, in his 2 years of playing, one thing Taylor is proving he's very good at is converting 3rd and long plays... he's been a top 5-10 QB at that 2 years in a row.)

So, back to that middle of the field in general thing. Luckily, ESPN does their own "splits" to certain sections of the field, and one of those is the "middle," which I would assume is between the hashmarks. I decided to take 11 of the most promising young QBs in the NFL who are likely the future at the QB position. I'm not doing every QB... it's just a pain. But I think anyone would agree there are plenty of promising young guys on this list, and these are the guys who comprise the future of the NFL. I included Luck, Newton, Rodgers, Mariota, Winston, Wilson, Tannehill, Cousins, Stafford, Ryan, Carr... and Taylor.

I used ESPN's splits and included:
-total % of throws to the "middle" when it comes to total throws
-% completions on those throws
-YPA on those throws
-TD passes over the middle
-INTs over the middle
-Passer Rating over the middle



Can you guess who's who?

QB 1: 9.3% of total attempts, 57.9 % completions, 7.5 YPA, 0 TDs, 2 INTs, 67.1 Passer Rating
QB 2: 10.6% of total attempts, 59.3 % completions, 8.6 YPA, 3 TDs, 1 INTs, 98 Passer Rating
QB 3: 10.6% of total attempts, 66.7 % completions, 8.1 YPA, 3 TDs, 1 INTs, 103.6 Passer Rating
QB 4: 12% of total attempts, 67.2 % completions, 8.6 YPA, 5 TDs, 3 INTs, 100.3 Passer Rating
QB 5: 7.3% of total attempts, 78.1 % completions, 8.7 YPA, 0 TDs, 0 INTs, 103 Passer Rating
QB 6: 10.3% of total attempts, 70 % completions, 6.3 YPA, 0 TDs, 1 INTs, 76.3 Passer Rating
QB 7: 8.4% of total attempts, 65.2 % completions, 7.5 YPA, 0 TDs, 0 INTs, 83.9 Passer Rating
QB 8: 11.7% of total attempts, 74.6 % completions, 10.4 YPA, 4 TDs, 4 INTs, 102.8 Passer Rating
QB 9: 10.8% of total attempts, 70.3 % completions, 7.9 YPA, 0 TDs, 0 INTs, 93.8 Passer Rating
QB10: 15.8% of total attempts, 61.6 % completions, 7.4 YPA, 6 TDs, 0 INTs, 107.5 Passer Rating
QB11: 9.7% of total attempts, 72.7 % completions, 8.2 YPA, 2 TDs, 1 INTs, 101.5 Passer Rating
QB12: 12.5% of total attempts, 71.6 % completions, 10.3 YPA, 7 TDs, 1 INTs, 133.3 Passer Rating



Which one is Taylor?

Who can find Rodgers?

Wilson?

There's one guy who throws significantly more over the middle than any of those guys, but anyone notice that passes to the middle for NFL QBs are relatively insignificant (in terms of % of passes) to all the other throws on the NFL field?

If you want to cheat and not guess, scroll down to the bottom.


There are some who argue that YAC is a problem with Taylor as a QB in general and it's a big reason he can't operate effectively out of the pocket as a passer, particularly throwing over the middle.. The general criticism is that it's on Taylor that the Bills are so poor in YAC because Taylor doesn't put the ball in places where WRs can gain any extra yardage.

I figured, why not put it to the test?

I started with the plan to do the whole season, but after doing the first 3 games and realizing time was an issue (wish I had more of it), I decided to jump to what I thought was his worst 4 game stretch. What I did was just rewatch the completions for ball placement to see how many of his completions were poorly placed and left yardage on the field. This is more about ball placement than accuracy... and yes, I think the 2 should be examined separately because accuracy would include all those incompletions. But there seems to be this general belief by some that Taylor's WRs were somehow always bailing him out and that Taylor is responsible for leaving yards on the field.

Well, in those 7 games (BALT, NYJ, ARI, CIN, JAX, OAK, PITT), Taylor completed 111 passes.

Only 7 of those passes were so poorly placed that they left potential yardage on the field.

1- A high pass to Clay on 3rd down in the Ravens game
2- A 3rd down pass to Woods in the Ravens game
3- A 2nd down pass to Goodwin in the Cardinals game
4- A 1st down pass that was low to a wide open Woods on the sideline in the Cardinals game
5- A 3rd down and 1 to Harvin in the Bengals game that was a little behind him... he was gonna get clobbered, anyway.
6- A 1st down pass to Clay that was a little behind him in the middle and really didn't have much chance for YAC... in fact, the chance for that YAC may have been to the middle, where the ball was thrown.
7- A 3rd down pass to Goodwin around the sideline that was a 1st down conversion, anyway

 

That's really it. You can be unhappy about ball placement on other passes, but if you rewatch, you'll see that really only 6.3% of all of Taylor's completed passes in 7 games (which included a number of really bad games from him) actually left yardage on the field. I'd love to show you images of some of these plays, but don't know how and can't... sorry.



Actual problems were the offense, which relied mainly on sideline throws and WRs who ran comeback or hook routes and weren't set up in positions due to the offense itself to get much YAC.

Taylor didn't control the routes that were run, and the routes weren't designed for YAC. If Taylor's still around in 2017, ball placement really shouldn't be an issue assuming Dennison's offense is designed to produce it, although if you look at the "middle of the field" throwing, it doesn't seem like the offense Taylor has operated in has been throwing insanely fewer times to the middle.

So, then we get to how well Taylor operates in tight spaces and anticipates throws. I'm grouping these 2 together because I think there's a single stat that demonstrates whether he does or does not do this very well: Red Zone passing, which you'll find easily in the situational stats on NFL.com.

Why? Because as you get inside the opponents 20, you have 30 yards or less vertically to work with and you'll have a more crowded area to work with. You'll be forced to throw the ball more into tight windows and you'll be forced to anticipate your passes more as you'll have less time to get it to WRs who will naturally be given less of a cushion to work with by DBs and LBs.

According to NFL.com
2015- 17/31, 90 yards, 6 TDs, 1 INT. Passer Rating of 86.4
2016- 30/50, 240 yards, 11 TDs, 0 INTs. Passer Rating of 111.7
Adding this on, according to
http://stats.washing...98&type=Passing, Taylor actually has the 6th highest Passer Rating and 10th highest completion % inside the 20.
Did he improve? I think this is an obvious yes. And 2016 wasn't a small sample size, either, as he attempted 19 more passes inside the opponents 20 than 2015. And I went back and watched every TD pass and the vast majority involve a pass from Taylor where a guy is not open yet and/or not looking at the ball yet and/or going through a tight window.

 

 

Something else that I think may have seriously contributed to Taylor's regression was the revolving door at WR. In terms of the number of games missed by only #1 and #2 WRs during the NFL season for each team going by depth charts:

0 games missed
*Playoff Teams*
Seattle
Oakland
Miami

*Non-Playoff Teams*
Carolina
Tennessee


1-4 games missed
*Playoff Teams*
Detroit (1)
NYG (2)
Houston (2)
New England (4) 5 if you take Edleman, Amendola, and Hogan as a group
Atlanta (4)
Green Bay (4)
Dallas (4)
Kansas City (4)

*Non-Playoff Teams*
Denver (1)
Washington (1)
Baltimore (2)
New Orleans (2)
Arizona (3) Floyd cut
Philadelphia



5-8 games missed
*Playoff Teams*
NONE
*Non-Playoff Teams*
Cincy (5)
Jax (5)
Minny (6)
Cleveland (6)
San Fran (7)
Indy (8)


9+ games missed
*Playoff Teams*
Pittsburgh (10) Heyward-Bey is listed as the #2 even though some might argue it was Coates, in which case it'd be 9
*Non-Playoff Teams*
Chicago (11)
Tampa Bay (11)
Buffalo (11)
NYJ (14
San Diego (15) Mainly due to Allen's injury. If you consider Inman the #2 as opposed to Benjamin, it's 13.

 

 

Yet, despite a depleted WR corps, Taylor seemed to improve in his "clutchness" to some degree, at least.  Yeah, to this day he's still only credited with 2 4th quarter comebacks (Ten, Jax), but actually watching the Seattle and 2nd Miami games, we saw a QB who in those moments belonged and actually seemed to elevate his team.  Taylor (and the team) were robbed in different ways (refs, coaching, bad defense, bad breaks) of those 2 game winning drives.  Regardless, Taylor's passer rating with less than 2 minutes remaining in the half still noticeably improved from 2015 (61.0) to 2016 (85.2).  That's a significant improvement.  And with 66 passes in 2016 and 53 in 2015, you can't call it a small sample size.

 

Even within the game, those plays that are most "clutch" are the 3rd down plays many were critical of with Taylor from 2015, when he was at the bottom of the league with a 37.2% conversion % on those 3rd down passes.  In 2016, he improved to 14th in the NFL and improved by more than 3% to 41.5%.

 

If you factor in his scrambles on 3rd down, which are passing plays, but Taylor decides to tuck and run instead for whatever reason, Taylor was 7/14 and bumps up to 42.4% in terms of 3rd down conversions in the passing game.

 

And maybe you have a problem with that last statement I made.  Why didn't I include all his 3rd down runs rather than just scrables? Well, because there's a difference betwen a design run and a scramble. A scramble indicates your OC is asking you to drop back for a pass. He's putting some amount of faith in your decision making there. The designed runs are usually option runs or QB draws Roman calls and they're pretty simple, but sometimes involve a read or two.

Roman & called 43 designed runs this year. 47 of Taylors other 90 runs, therefore, were scrambles in plays designed as passes. 

 

(If you're wondering where those other 5 rushes are that Taylor is credited for, those were 5 kneeldowns for -6 yards, which means Taylor's actual rushing stats on the year were 90 rushes for 586 yards for 6.5 YPC)

Taylor scored 4 of his 6 rushing TDs on those designed runs, but he actually "only" gained about 4.9 yards a carry on them.

Now, if we consider that Taylor, who has a skillset unique to the majority of QBs in the NFL (Newton, Wilson, Rodgers are all exceptions with a couple others like Alex Smith), many of these other QBs (Brady, Rivers, Peyton, Eli, etc.) aren't going to be scrambling and/or scrambling for nearly as many yards on these plays where he breaks pressure... and in fact, these QBs would often go down for a sack. Yes, they'll also find the open man down the field sometimes that Taylor doesn't, but that's really already accounted for in all of their numbers, anyway.

So, the way I think of the passing game and vs. the running aspect of Taylor's game in 2016, this is how I see them:
 

3620 yards passing & 223 yards rushing
7YPA
20 passing TDs & 4 rushing TDs
Four 300 yard passing games (Jets, @ Seattle, Pitt, Miami)



Yeah yeah yeah, I'm pretending that all of those designed passes are plays where he passes instead and gets the same results and adding those stats to the Jets game he was benched for in Week 17.

On the 47 plays in 2016 that are designed passes where, whether by force or choice (and a ton of them were by force), Taylor scrambles, he gains 371 yards. That means on all of those designed passes where he's forced to survey the field for an open WR and make a choice on who to throw it to (or scramble), Taylor is gaining more yardage than his YPA (7.9 on scrambles vs. 6.9 YPA).  Actually, he's gaining more yards on those passing plays as a scrambler than all but 4 other NFL QBs did in 2016 as passers: Prescott, Cousins, Brady, & Ryan.

 

 

What that means is that everyone saying that Taylor running on those passing plays is a bad thing overall is just really not true.  It might be on a few plays here and there, but overall, Taylor as a scrambler gains more yards on those plays he chooses to scramble than every other NFL QB did (except the 4 guys listed above) when they passed.

Those are the objective things.

Subjectively, I can say that watching all of his scrambles, he really was running for his life a whole lot and made some absolutely crazy plays that would have been sacks if not for his own athleticism.  Mills really was a turnstile... I can't believe he's going to be back.

 

 

Anyway, I still have hope Taylor can be our long term answer, even though I no longer have any confidence he will.  At the very least, he sure is exciting to watch.

 



























*For those who had the patience to read all of that... bravo!* :-)

KEY TO QB PASSING OVER THE MIDDLE
Rodgers: 9.3% of total attempts, 57.9 % completions, 7.5 YPA, 0 TDs, 2 INTs, 67.1 Passer Rating
Newton: 10.6% of total attempts, 59.3 % completions, 8.6 YPA, 3 TDs, 1 INTs, 98 Passer Rating
Mariota: 10.6% of total attempts, 66.7 % completions, 8.1 YPA, 3 TDs, 1 INTs, 103.6 Passer Rating
Carr: 12% of total attempts, 67.2 % completions, 8.6 YPA, 5 TDs, 3 INTs, 100.3 Passer Rating
Taylor: 7.3% of total attempts, 78.1 % completions, 8.7 YPA, 0 TDs, 0 INTs, 103 Passer Rating
Tannehill: 10.3% of total attempts, 70 % completions, 6.3 YPA, 0 TDs, 1 INTs, 76.3 Passer Rating
Wilson: 8.4% of total attempts, 65.2 % completions, 7.5 YPA, 0 TDs, 0 INTs, 83.9 Passer Rating
Cousins: 11.7% of total attempts, 74.6 % completions, 10.4 YPA, 4 TDs, 4 INTs, 102.8 Passer Rating
Stafford: 10.8% of total attempts, 70.3 % completions, 7.9 YPA, 0 TDs, 0 INTs, 93.8 Passer Rating
Luck: 15.8% of total attempts, 61.6 % completions, 7.4 YPA, 6 TDs, 0 INTs, 107.5 Passer Rating
Winston: 9.7% of total attempts, 72.7 % completions, 8.2 YPA, 2 TDs, 1 INTs, 101.5 Passer Rating
Ryan: 12.5% of total attempts, 71.6 % completions, 10.3 YPA, 7 TDs, 1 INTs, 133.3 Passer Rating



#2 Teeflebees

Teeflebees

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,701 posts

Posted 15 March 2017 - 04:45 PM

It earned him a restructured contract at reduced pay.... so yes you're technically correct. It's a great contract on from the Bills side. Not great from Taylor's side but he can help give himself a pay raise with better play.
As it stands right now, it's a 1 or 2 year bridge deal.

#3 transplantbillsfan

transplantbillsfan

    RFA

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 949 posts

Posted 15 March 2017 - 05:15 PM

It earned him a restructured contract at reduced pay.... so yes you're technically correct. It's a great contract on from the Bills side. Not great from Taylor's side but he can help give himself a pay raise with better play.
As it stands right now, it's a 1 or 2 year bridge deal.

 

From a purely money perspective, yeah, not great from Taylor's side.

 

It's a spectacular contract on the Bills side for 2017 for sure.

 

But it's going to be interesting to see what happens in 2017 regarding how Taylor plays.  Because the Cap hit for 2018 for Taylor is already more than it was with the other contract and then another long term decision would need to be made on whether to keep Taylor after that.

 

And as we've already seen this offseason, the question of whether we'll keep him or cut him is truly up in the air and based only on how he plays in the next season or 2.

 

https://medium.com/@...709e#.53bi0qsoc

 

An interesting perspective on the restructured contract.



#4 Maury Ballstein

Maury Ballstein

    All Pro

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,786 posts

Posted 15 March 2017 - 05:20 PM

1 vote for Taylor stinks.

#5 Teeflebees

Teeflebees

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,701 posts

Posted 15 March 2017 - 05:21 PM

 
From a purely money perspective, yeah, not great from Taylor's side.
 
It's a spectacular contract on the Bills side for 2017 for sure.
 
But it's going to be interesting to see what happens in 2017 regarding how Taylor plays.  Because the Cap hit for 2018 for Taylor is already more than it was with the other contract and then another long term decision would need to be made on whether to keep Taylor after that.
 
And as we've already seen this offseason, the question of whether we'll keep him or cut him is truly up in the air and based only on how he plays in the next season or 2.
 
https://medium.com/@...709e#.53bi0qsoc
 
An interesting perspective on the restructured contract.


I want Taylor to play lights out where he turns this bridge contract into a long term. I'm just skeptical but it would be the best case scenario for the Bills. Imagine if we didn't have to worry about about the QB position for the next 6 years? It would be nice...

#6 Patrick_Duffy

Patrick_Duffy

    Practice Squad

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 118 posts

Posted 15 March 2017 - 05:24 PM

Tyrod gona cook it up this season, mane. 2017 season will be a cakewalk for the Bills. B-)



#7 Bangarang

Bangarang

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,278 posts

Posted 15 March 2017 - 05:24 PM

The front office did a great job redeeming themselves with this new restructured contract. Taylor can be a decent starter in this league if things around him are going well. That's as far as I'm willing to go with him right now.

#8 DaBillsFanSince1973

DaBillsFanSince1973

    RFA

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,050 posts

Posted 15 March 2017 - 05:28 PM

1 vote for Taylor stinks.

 

are you the board troll? I only ask because I've followed some of your posts and they fit well in that category. don't mean to step on toes or anything, just calling it as I see it.

 

 

 

 

good contract from the bills side for sure and TT can be rewarded more with better play this season, which I believe he does have a better year than 2016?



#9 Thurman#1

Thurman#1

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,181 posts

Posted 15 March 2017 - 05:32 PM

"A bit" of a Taylor homer? 

 

Puh-leeze!! You were a wild-eyed Taylor homer on six-packs of Red Bull. As was pointed out over there, nineteen of the last twenty-five threads you started were about Taylor, if I remember those numbers correctly.

 

 

 

 

In any case, the reason that he was kept around is that he re-negotiated his contract down to a bridge QB-type deal. Even back when the first story by Schefter, came out saying that the Bills were planning to "move on," he was pointing out that the money was the problem. He said, "Picking up the option would guarantee Taylor $30.75 million over the life of the contract, tying him to Buffalo for the next five seasons, and the Bills don't have any intention of paying it." Not that they had no intention of keeping him, but that they had no intention of paying that outsize contract. He re-negotiated, so he's here.

 

He's excellent at taking care of the ball, a very important skill. And he's a terrific runner. But he's got major drawbacks as well, and the end result is like a bridge QB who is now on a bridge deal.

 

I certainly hope he makes the huge steps up he will have to make to become a franchise QB. It would be by far the best thing for the Bills. 


Edited by Thurman#1, 15 March 2017 - 05:45 PM.


#10 HappyDays

HappyDays

    RFA

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,076 posts

Posted 15 March 2017 - 05:34 PM

Does this board have an ignore feature I'm not seeing? It's not too hard to tell who the trolls are around here, and the one in this thread has finally tested my patience enough.

Thanks for compiling all the research transplant. It's good to know you didn't lose everything in the BBMB purge. One bit of research I keep thinking of doing, but never find time to do, is an analysis on how QBs perform without their top receiver(s). There seemingly aren't any articles out there that have tried to find out what the effect is, and I'm curious to know how Tyrod's regression after losing Watkins might compare to other QBs.

#11 Maury Ballstein

Maury Ballstein

    All Pro

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,786 posts

Posted 15 March 2017 - 05:41 PM

are you the board troll? I only ask because I've followed some of your posts and they fit well in that category. don't mean to step on toes or anything, just calling it as I see it.
 
 
 
 
good contract from the bills side for sure and TT can be rewarded more with better play this season, which I believe he does have a better year than 2016?

Just a guy who is tired of watching all of the sad bums that we trot out at qb. TT will fail again and it's easy to see from afar.

This streak runs all the way back to post Flutie. His 1-6 record vs .500 teams is all I need to see.

I can delete my posts if this is the only say good things about TT thread. Lmk.

Edited by Ryan L Billz, 15 March 2017 - 05:44 PM.


#12 Patrick_Duffy

Patrick_Duffy

    Practice Squad

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 118 posts

Posted 15 March 2017 - 05:44 PM

Just a guy who is tired of watching all of the sad bums that we trot out at qb. TT will fail again and it's easy to see from afar.

This streak runs all the way back to post Flutie. His 1-6 record vs .500 teams is all I need to see.

 

Show us on the doll where Tyrod Taylor touched you.



#13 Maury Ballstein

Maury Ballstein

    All Pro

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,786 posts

Posted 15 March 2017 - 05:45 PM

Show us on the doll where Tyrod Taylor touched you.


He touched my Baltimore once and I wrote it off. Then a few months went by and he touched my Oakland and my Pittsburgh.

#14 transplantbillsfan

transplantbillsfan

    RFA

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 949 posts

Posted 15 March 2017 - 05:46 PM

I want Taylor to play lights out where he turns this bridge contract into a long term. I'm just skeptical but it would be the best case scenario for the Bills. Imagine if we didn't have to worry about about the QB position for the next 6 years? It would be nice...

 

I'm skeptical, too.

 

And I was after the season ended.

 

I just think it's interesting what Buffalo has done with this new contract, which to me is more a "prove-it" deal than a Bridge deal... maybe they're one in the same, who knows.

 

The contract and freeing up of Cap space just makes it look like Buffalo is in "win-now" mode.  Yet, we sure aren't doing much in FA... namely with the WR corps.  I sure get the impression from McDermott that we're going to try to win and win immediately, but unless Jordan Mills lost a ton of weight and learned how to play WR, I'm wondering what the heck is going on because if the team (Whaley) really aren't in win-now mode, I wish they would have just dropped Taylor altogether and started Jones.



#15 Patrick_Duffy

Patrick_Duffy

    Practice Squad

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 118 posts

Posted 15 March 2017 - 05:48 PM

He touched my Baltimore once and I wrote it off. Then a few months went by and he touched my Oakland and my Pittsburgh.

 

How come you didn't like it lol?


Edited by Patrick_Duffy, 15 March 2017 - 05:49 PM.


#16 transplantbillsfan

transplantbillsfan

    RFA

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 949 posts

Posted 15 March 2017 - 05:49 PM

"A bit" of a Taylor homer? 

 

Puh-leeze!! You were a wild-eyed Taylor homer on six-packs of Red Bull. As was pointed out over there, nineteen of the last twenty-five threads you started were about Taylor, if I remember those numbers correctly.

 

 

 

 

In any case, the reason that he was kept around is that he re-negotiated his contract down to a bridge QB-type deal. Even back when the first story by Schefter, came out saying that the Bills were planning to "move on," he was pointing out that the money was the problem. He said, "Picking up the option would guarantee Taylor $30.75 million over the life of the contract, tying him to Buffalo for the next five seasons, and the Bills don't have any intention of paying it." Not that they had no intention of keeping him, but that they had no intention of paying that outsize contract. He re-negotiated, so he's here.

 

He's excellent at taking care of the ball, a very important skill. And he's a terrific runner. But he's got major drawbacks as well, and the end result is like a bridge QB who is now on a bridge deal.

 

I certainly hope he makes the huge steps up he will have to make to become a franchise QB. It would be by far the best thing for the Bills. 

 

Hi Thurm... you upset?  Still have your baggage, I see...

 

 

So much for new beginnings for you :thumbdown:



#17 Thurman#1

Thurman#1

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,181 posts

Posted 15 March 2017 - 05:51 PM

And by the way, Tyrod's "over the middle" problems have always been much more specific than that. His problems have been in the deep and intermediate middle of the field. He's always thrown well to the short middle and that muddies up the stats since for every QB around 70 - 80% of his passes are short (less than 10 yards according to ESPN, the source you always use for your stats). So yeah, when you throw in his good and plentiful short passes to the middle, it does indeed tend to overcome his infrequent and not as good use of the deep and intermediate middle. 

 

Oh, and you're again using the words "over the middle" in a way that doesn't describe Tyrod's problem area. HIs problems aren't only between the hashes. Between the hashes is only about 12% of the field. Tyrod's problem area, again, is the deep and intermediate middle third of the field. He throws well outside the numbers but also for about three to four yards inside the numbers as well.

 

The deep and intermediate middle third is the problem area and you can't find stats for that area because there's no visible line there for people to quickly use to define it. So you have to look at every pass. 

 

But that's not a problem. Everyone already knows this about Tyrod, the pundits, the coaches, everybody.


Edited by Thurman#1, 15 March 2017 - 05:57 PM.


#18 Maury Ballstein

Maury Ballstein

    All Pro

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,786 posts

Posted 15 March 2017 - 05:52 PM

How come you didn't like it lol?


I started to say No after Fitz touched me in the MetLife stadium.

Never again !

#19 Thurman#1

Thurman#1

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,181 posts

Posted 15 March 2017 - 05:52 PM

 

Hi Thurm... you upset?  Still have your baggage, I see...

 

 

So much for new beginnings for you :thumbdown:

 

 

 

I've been here years.

 

And yes, I've still got sense and am still willing to point out the logical flaws in your arguments.



#20 Lothar

Lothar

    Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 747 posts

Posted 15 March 2017 - 05:58 PM

That's some good analysis there. A little scattershot but I appreciate the effort you took to compile this. I'm not sold on Tyrod after this past year but I think we'll find out what we have in him if folks stay healthy and the defense starts turning things around.