Jump to content


Photo

Report: Seahawks Open to Trading Richard Sherman


  • Please log in to reply
262 replies to this topic

#21 #BADOL

#BADOL

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,360 posts

Posted 16 March 2017 - 08:32 PM

I wonder what the Seahawks price would be? He's a perfect fit in this defense but I have no clue what the asking price would be.

 

 

I've been thinking a late second rounder.  Not sure an early third would get it done.

 

A swap of first round positioning is also possible but the Bills would probably be due another pick back.

 

He's not worth a first rounder in trade........and especially not with the influx of young DB's about to hit the league.

 

He's 29 years old, 7 years in the league with a big contract and he will bring some drama to any lockeroom so he's not bringing a #1.

 

It adds up that they'd consider moving him this year with it being such a deep CB draft.



#22 Jamie Muellers Ghost

Jamie Muellers Ghost

    Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 390 posts

Posted 16 March 2017 - 08:34 PM

To open up room to re-sign Shead ?

#23 #BADOL

#BADOL

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,360 posts

Posted 16 March 2017 - 08:36 PM

His contract would be a 2-year, $22.431m deal after a trade. I'd consider that pretty decent value for who he is and his experience in a Cover 3 defense.

 

The question is; does he want an extension as part of any trade?

 

 

I figured he'd require it.......he's an even bigger diva than Shady and he's going to be pissed about being traded.

 

I think they could get him down in the $7M-$8M cap figure range with an extension.

 

Like the idea of importing some players that come from winning, competitive, playoff environments.

 

I was in on Kris Richard simply because I want that Seattle environment brought to Buffalo.

 

It's hard to break the cycle of mediocrity but they did it with a bunch of no-names and players that were passed over in the draft.....in great part due to the battling spirit they've cultivated there.


Edited by #BADOL, 16 March 2017 - 08:37 PM.


#24 Playoffs?

Playoffs?

    RFA

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 597 posts

Posted 16 March 2017 - 08:39 PM

2 year contract. Get it done.

Go WR with first pick in draft.

#25 White Linen

White Linen

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,838 posts

Posted 16 March 2017 - 08:39 PM

He's not aggressive. He's a douche!!!

 

He's both



#26 TheTruthHurts

TheTruthHurts

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,892 posts

Posted 16 March 2017 - 08:45 PM

My guess is he wants an extension. Sherman is the perfect fit for this defense. For for CBs is really key. We lost Gilmore, on paper it looks big, but Gilmore was not a fit for this defense. We will play a lot more zone.



#27 Kirby Jackson

Kirby Jackson

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,287 posts

Posted 16 March 2017 - 08:45 PM

Butler is about to go for pick 32. I don't know what (if anything) that does to Sherman's market.

#28 FireChan

FireChan

    All Pro

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,964 posts

Posted 16 March 2017 - 08:48 PM

I'd heard this multiple times and I've floated the idea but never gotten a response yet.
 
I guess people thought it couldn't be true.
 
Seattle is like NE.......they have an untouchable value on only one player.....their QB.


I remember seeing you post it. Kudos.

The question is why is Sherman the one made expendable first?

 
 
I figured he'd require it.......he's an even bigger diva than Shady and he's going to be pissed about being traded.
 
I think they could get him down in the $7M-$8M cap figure range with an extension.
 
Like the idea of importing some players that come from winning, competitive, playoff environments.
 
I was in on Kris Richard simply because I want that Seattle environment brought to Buffalo.
 
It's hard to break the cycle of mediocrity but they did it with a bunch of no-names and players that were passed over in the draft.....in great part due to the battling spirit they've cultivated there.


Yep!

Malcolm Smith and Bruce Irvin both had a hand in turning around Oakland too.

#29 TheTruthHurts

TheTruthHurts

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,892 posts

Posted 16 March 2017 - 08:49 PM

I remember seeing you post it. Kudos.

The question is why is Sherman the one made expendable first?

 

Money. It always comes down to money. Seattle has a player hitting 30 soon who likely wants another extension. Winning teams turn that player into good value so they can keep winning.



#30 cba fan

cba fan

    Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 294 posts

Posted 16 March 2017 - 08:50 PM

Butler is about to go for pick 32. I don't know what (if anything) that does to Sherman's market.

No Butler is not going for a #1. Saints are negotiating a deal with Butler and if they agree will then approach pats for a trade. Likely a 3rd.



#31 GG

GG

    Exit 151

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 27,260 posts

Posted 16 March 2017 - 08:52 PM

Only if they bring Carpenter back.



#32 #BADOL

#BADOL

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,360 posts

Posted 16 March 2017 - 08:53 PM

I remember seeing you post it. Kudos.

The question is why is Sherman the one made expendable first?

Yep!

Malcolm Smith and Bruce Irvin both had a hand in turning around Oakland too.

 

Just a hunch but I think the coaches were not happy with him publicly calling out Bevell last year.

 

I mean EVERYONE knows that they f*cked up that play call in the SB.......and two years later Sherman is openly dwelling at the expense of a member of PC's staff.

 

Pete Carroll strikes me as a turn the page kinda' guy and maybe they think that kinda' living-in-past failures thing is not going to fly.



#33 Kirby Jackson

Kirby Jackson

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,287 posts

Posted 16 March 2017 - 09:08 PM

No Butler is not going for a #1. Saints are negotiating a deal with Butler and if they agree will then approach pats for a trade. Likely a 3rd.

No, they would have had to give 11. I live in NOLA and have been following it all day. Pick 32 is the price they are discussing.

Edited by Kirby Jackson, 16 March 2017 - 09:09 PM.


#34 BuffaloBaumer

BuffaloBaumer

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,142 posts

Posted 16 March 2017 - 09:16 PM

hmmmm interesting...wondering if they would take #10 overall


Is this real? Let's mortgage the future before we find a qb....great idea!!!

#35 JerseyBills

JerseyBills

    Practice Squad

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 243 posts

Posted 16 March 2017 - 09:29 PM

If McDermott feels he could truly take away half the field in his scheme then heck yea, grab him up , in reason of course.

#36 TheTruthHurts

TheTruthHurts

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,892 posts

Posted 16 March 2017 - 09:32 PM

If McDermott feels he could truly take away half the field in his scheme then heck yea, grab him up , in reason of course.

well 1/3 of the field. Cover 3. Imagine. Darby/Shead 1/3, Hyde 1/3, and Sherman 1/3.

Just find a sideline to sideline LB and we are ready to roll.

#37 aristocrat

aristocrat

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,074 posts

Posted 16 March 2017 - 09:37 PM

Smart play. I wanted Gilmore traded last year. Older player big salary you move to get a pick to replace. Tough call but gotta think long term. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

#38 Do The Reich Thing

Do The Reich Thing

    UDFA

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 86 posts

Posted 16 March 2017 - 09:37 PM

Do you Bills fans even remember the MNF game?!! Why the hell would you want this man on the team?

#39 K-GunJimKelly12

K-GunJimKelly12

    Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 487 posts

Posted 16 March 2017 - 09:43 PM

Do you Bills fans even remember the MNF game?!! Why the hell would you want this man on the team?


Because he is a great corner and a team full if nice guys usually doesn't win.

#40 Boyst62

Boyst62

    Hall of Farmer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 31,890 posts

Posted 16 March 2017 - 09:59 PM

He's an asshat. Not interested.